Thanks McShady-----I see Billingsley even to +110 and Lilly +115 to +125 in the next two after tonight and I like our chances.
Thanks McShady-----I see Billingsley even to +110 and Lilly +115 to +125 in the next two after tonight and I like our chances.
Thought you was taking yanks for the series.wow guess you lose 2 out of 3 you can flip over on game 3 . nice chase dude
Thought you was taking yanks for the series.wow guess you lose 2 out of 3 you can flip over on game 3 . nice chase dude
I flipped because this is not a robot system. This is called "under dog" chase plays and when the dog becomes the favorite I am going to analyze it and make sure we are getting value for our bets. Yankees at -140 became a negative 6 in my formula. The angels were at -5 and I did not switch when I should have. Like I said before, this is a work in progress and if you do not like what I am doing don't tail. I want to tweak this thing and refine it to were I can be a consistent 20-0 or 19-1. I am going to have growing pains and I might not get to my goal but in the meantime if you are patient and discliplned you may make some cash with me.
The Yankees and Angels this week taught me a lot, plus I added the series odds as part of my data sheet. Thank you McShady for that and thanks to Da Boys, Pujo Junkie, Bandit and all you guys for being supportive over the last few weeks.
Be good....Friday picks up shortly.....
BY THE WAY...WAY TO GO RED SOX BABY!!
I flipped because this is not a robot system. This is called "under dog" chase plays and when the dog becomes the favorite I am going to analyze it and make sure we are getting value for our bets. Yankees at -140 became a negative 6 in my formula. The angels were at -5 and I did not switch when I should have. Like I said before, this is a work in progress and if you do not like what I am doing don't tail. I want to tweak this thing and refine it to were I can be a consistent 20-0 or 19-1. I am going to have growing pains and I might not get to my goal but in the meantime if you are patient and discliplned you may make some cash with me.
The Yankees and Angels this week taught me a lot, plus I added the series odds as part of my data sheet. Thank you McShady for that and thanks to Da Boys, Pujo Junkie, Bandit and all you guys for being supportive over the last few weeks.
Be good....Friday picks up shortly.....
BY THE WAY...WAY TO GO RED SOX BABY!!
Made +150 last night thanks to the swtich but still have a long way to go to make WEEK 7 profitable.
WEEK 7 5-1, -282
Won the Yanks/Sox series but lost money, very hollow win I know.
Made +150 last night thanks to the swtich but still have a long way to go to make WEEK 7 profitable.
WEEK 7 5-1, -282
Won the Yanks/Sox series but lost money, very hollow win I know.
HERE WE GO MY FRIENDS, GOOD LUCK ALL!!!!
NATIONALS +145 500 to win 725 BET 2
DODGERS +140 500 to win 700 BET 2
FRIDAY SERIES
INDIANS +145 200 to win 290
ROYALS +140 200 to win 280
ORIOLES +125 200 to win 250
REDS +110 200 to win 220
HERE WE GO MY FRIENDS, GOOD LUCK ALL!!!!
NATIONALS +145 500 to win 725 BET 2
DODGERS +140 500 to win 700 BET 2
FRIDAY SERIES
INDIANS +145 200 to win 290
ROYALS +140 200 to win 280
ORIOLES +125 200 to win 250
REDS +110 200 to win 220
Semper nice work, mcshady good info. I enjoy good research and system plays, been following this lately, like it. Let me throw something out for discussion: w/the Nats and LAD we now have 6 series going. The potential profit is 6 units + if each one wins. However if 1 team is swept the loss is 7 units, making it hard to profit. If the Reds are swept (the lowest odds) the best result is +6.95 (or less) if all of the others win, giving a loss of -.5 units. If KC is swept the win is even less. Of course longer/shorter odds would make it easier/harder to profit if there is a sweep.
However if we bet 1, 1, 2 given that our teams are underdogs we still show a nice profit (if Nats win tonite up + .45 units with a 1,1 bet) if they are not swept. Should 1 team get swept we are only -4 units v. -7. As they should be dogs for all games even game 3 @ +110 for 2 units would return a profit of some sort.
Look forward to comments, let me know what you think.
Thanks
Semper nice work, mcshady good info. I enjoy good research and system plays, been following this lately, like it. Let me throw something out for discussion: w/the Nats and LAD we now have 6 series going. The potential profit is 6 units + if each one wins. However if 1 team is swept the loss is 7 units, making it hard to profit. If the Reds are swept (the lowest odds) the best result is +6.95 (or less) if all of the others win, giving a loss of -.5 units. If KC is swept the win is even less. Of course longer/shorter odds would make it easier/harder to profit if there is a sweep.
However if we bet 1, 1, 2 given that our teams are underdogs we still show a nice profit (if Nats win tonite up + .45 units with a 1,1 bet) if they are not swept. Should 1 team get swept we are only -4 units v. -7. As they should be dogs for all games even game 3 @ +110 for 2 units would return a profit of some sort.
Look forward to comments, let me know what you think.
Thanks
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.