ML: 184-157, +12.19 units RL: 92-87-17, -9.81 units TT: 393-345-44, +15.93 units O/U: 154-129-13, +4.26 units 1st-5 Sides: 0-2, -2.72 units 1st-5 Totals: 55-45-4, +3.99 units TOTAL: 878-765-78, +23.84 units
Marlins (Rodriguez/Straily) +115 Tigers (Lynn/Fulmer) -105 Marlins Team Total Over 3.5 (Rodriguez/Straily) -110 Tigers Team Total Over 4 (Lynn/Fulmer) -130
GL to all.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
19-12-2, +4.69 yesterday.
All plays are 1 unit unless otherwise noted.
ML: 184-157, +12.19 units RL: 92-87-17, -9.81 units TT: 393-345-44, +15.93 units O/U: 154-129-13, +4.26 units 1st-5 Sides: 0-2, -2.72 units 1st-5 Totals: 55-45-4, +3.99 units TOTAL: 878-765-78, +23.84 units
Marlins (Rodriguez/Straily) +115 Tigers (Lynn/Fulmer) -105 Marlins Team Total Over 3.5 (Rodriguez/Straily) -110 Tigers Team Total Over 4 (Lynn/Fulmer) -130
Crap. Sorry guys. Hold the phone on those Rockies/Phillies bets. Those bets had a lot to do with the ump and I'm reading that it might not be who I thought it was. Still waiting to confirm before buying out of my bets.
0
Crap. Sorry guys. Hold the phone on those Rockies/Phillies bets. Those bets had a lot to do with the ump and I'm reading that it might not be who I thought it was. Still waiting to confirm before buying out of my bets.
Crap. Sorry guys. Hold the phone on those Rockies/Phillies bets. Those bets had a lot to do with the ump and I'm reading that it might not be who I thought it was. Still waiting to confirm before buying out of my bets.
Screw it. I'm gonna stick with what I have and hope for the best even if it turns out it's a different ump.
0
Quote Originally Posted by weeble5672:
Crap. Sorry guys. Hold the phone on those Rockies/Phillies bets. Those bets had a lot to do with the ump and I'm reading that it might not be who I thought it was. Still waiting to confirm before buying out of my bets.
Screw it. I'm gonna stick with what I have and hope for the best even if it turns out it's a different ump.
If you figure the Yankees Under 4.5, and the game under 9, that has to give you a heck of a probability that the Rays either win, or score 3 or less. Which is it?
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Take a swing at this curve ball weebs.
If you figure the Yankees Under 4.5, and the game under 9, that has to give you a heck of a probability that the Rays either win, or score 3 or less. Which is it?
Take a swing at this curve ball weebs. If you figure the Yankees Under 4.5, and the game under 9, that has to give you a heck of a probability that the Rays either win, or score 3 or less. Which is it?
I dunno. What does it matter? As long as my bets win. Yanks can win 3-1 for all I care.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Take a swing at this curve ball weebs. If you figure the Yankees Under 4.5, and the game under 9, that has to give you a heck of a probability that the Rays either win, or score 3 or less. Which is it?
I dunno. What does it matter? As long as my bets win. Yanks can win 3-1 for all I care.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.