BS!!!
With the Kings and Ducks overtime wins, I am beyond pissed. I could have hit my longshot parlay.
I realize an A's win is not a given, but the non legitimacy of the loss is bugging me.
With the Kings and Ducks overtime wins, I am beyond pissed. I could have hit my longshot parlay.
I realize an A's win is not a given, but the non legitimacy of the loss is bugging me.
That's a copout response from Angel Hernandez on several levels. If they saw the replay we were all privy to on television, there's no way he can stand behind that reasoning. None. The evidence wasn't just sufficient, it was overwhelming, which is why manager Bob Melvin blew a gasket and found himself in the dugout a few minutes early.
That's a copout response from Angel Hernandez on several levels. If they saw the replay we were all privy to on television, there's no way he can stand behind that reasoning. None. The evidence wasn't just sufficient, it was overwhelming, which is why manager Bob Melvin blew a gasket and found himself in the dugout a few minutes early.
Gammons was interviewed recently and has commented that nobody could look at that replay and rule "double", so the question is , what is his motive, and Gammons proposes something to the extent of "spite", as in, Hernandez is fighting the whole concept of replay by intentionally botching the call with the aid of replay.
Whatever the reason, it's refreshing to see people in the media cry conspiracy first, and now let's find out why.
Gammons was interviewed recently and has commented that nobody could look at that replay and rule "double", so the question is , what is his motive, and Gammons proposes something to the extent of "spite", as in, Hernandez is fighting the whole concept of replay by intentionally botching the call with the aid of replay.
Whatever the reason, it's refreshing to see people in the media cry conspiracy first, and now let's find out why.
Gammons was interviewed recently and has commented that nobody could look at that replay and rule "double", so the question is , what is his motive, and Gammons proposes something to the extent of "spite", as in, Hernandez is fighting the whole concept of replay by intentionally botching the call with the aid of replay.
Whatever the reason, it's refreshing to see people in the media cry conspiracy first, and now let's find out why.
Gammons was interviewed recently and has commented that nobody could look at that replay and rule "double", so the question is , what is his motive, and Gammons proposes something to the extent of "spite", as in, Hernandez is fighting the whole concept of replay by intentionally botching the call with the aid of replay.
Whatever the reason, it's refreshing to see people in the media cry conspiracy first, and now let's find out why.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.