All Forums | MLB Betting

Why had BOS line dropped so MUCH!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1031
Posts: 31
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2004
Posts: 22102
Posted: #1
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 6770
Posted: #2
Oakland is the play.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 12442
Posted: #3
Oakland is most certaintly the play
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2004
Posts: 22102
Posted: #4
lol.  so can you screw up answer the question?  i didn't ask for you $50 lame picks.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 4067
Posted: #5
agree
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22693
Posted: #6
I believe King Scorpio said if the line going the other way of what you like, Pound It.

If its going opposite of what you like, Stay Away...

Its dropping and I like Beckett to bounce back. The cheaper the better.





 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 6770
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by thedegenerate:

lol.  so can you screw up answer the question?  i didn't ask for you $50 lame picks.


You are an idiot. You just received the play for free from a top of the line capper and you are complaining? It's a $50 pick only if that's all you can afford.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 3674
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by golfandgamble:

I believe King Scorpio said if the line going the other way of what you like, Pound It.

If its going opposite of what you like, Stay Away...

Its dropping and I like Beckett to bounce back. The cheaper the better.





"going the other way of what you like"

"opposite of what you like"

They mean the same thing.  I think I know what you meant, but could you please clarify.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 2201
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by thedegenerate:

lol.  so can you screw up answer the question?  i didn't ask for you $50 lame picks.


Maybe the correct pick is you like to play with cock?  I mean what the hell do you want for an answer?


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22693
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by ruffcutter2006:

"going the other way of what you like"

"opposite of what you like"

They mean the same thing.  I think I know what you meant, but could you please clarify.



He's a veteran around here, and I don't want to write opposite of what I read. Whatever he put made sense, I cant find the thread he posted in.

Sorry.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2004
Posts: 22102
Posted: #11
hey cocksuck.  i was looking for some specifics not your motherfucking picks.  covers is becoming more and more of a fucking joke you all of you rookies.  don't comment unless you have something of value you stupid fuck.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 2201
Posted: #12
Slurp slurp slurp.

As usual you lead by example.  I am having trouble reading all the valuable knowledge you added to the subject of this post.  Oh yeah you didn't add shit, imagine that.

Slurp slurp slurp.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 6770
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by thedegenerate:

hey cocksuck.  i was looking for some specifics not your motherfucking picks.  covers is becoming more and more of a fucking joke you all of you rookies.  don't comment unless you have something of value you stupid fuck.


You're the idiot. We tried to help you for nothing. Not sure how you amassed all those posts. Probably by asking 17,627 stupid questions.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 2201
Posted: #14
He got bonus points for a lil slurp slurp slurp.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 2201
Posted: #15
Oakland ML and RL

Pointlessly questioning those who have a quarter the posts you have but 10 times the intelligence you have. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 18557
Posted: #16


           
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 5108
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by thedegenerate:

hey cocksuck.  i was looking for some specifics not your motherfucking picks.  covers is becoming more and more of a fucking joke you all of you rookies.  don't comment unless you have something of value you stupid fuck.

Look who's talking.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 119
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by lanastasis:



You are an idiot. You just received the play for free from a top of the line capper and you are complaining? It's a $50 pick only if that's all you can afford.
Who the hell calls themself a "top of the line capper"? I see modesty isn't your strong suit..
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 6770
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by E-MAC:

Who the hell calls themself a "top of the line capper"? I see modesty isn't your strong suit..


If I'm modest, I'm not honest.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 119
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by lanastasis:



If I'm modest, I'm not honest.
You've won what, about 15 units this year? That's based on if you would have played each game 1 unit and included totals into your record (which you stopped doing because you were embarrassed of the losses). I will say anytime you can win money it's a good thing, and I congratulate you on winning money, but don't act like your the top guy around here...dsn or whatever that guys name is has won 50 units at 1 unit per play. The difference is he doesn't run his mouth off like you for the attention. I'm not typically a hater, but you're just way too cocky.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 1119
Posted: #21

A's are not the obvious plays here..

Boston is a better hitting team + lester is a better pitcher than blanton..

However..It is an away game + lester is is prone to a let down

So I'll take A's at + money.. but this is an obvious play.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 1119
Posted: #22
correction:  "not" an obvious play     sry
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 2201
Posted: #23
gameto11 you are so bad at this baseball betting.  I mean hell you fail to even be able to identify what day this thread is about.  We were discussing SATURDAY'S game, not SUNDAY'S.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 6770
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by E-MAC:

You've won what, about 15 units this year? That's based on if you would have played each game 1 unit and included totals into your record (which you stopped doing because you were embarrassed of the losses). I will say anytime you can win money it's a good thing, and I congratulate you on winning money, but don't act like your the top guy around here...dsn or whatever that guys name is has won 50 units at 1 unit per play. The difference is he doesn't run his mouth off like you for the attention. I'm not typically a hater, but you're just way too cocky.


What do you mean my record would be XXX if I was betting 1 unit? I'm not betting 1 unit and anyone with a proven track record who only bets 1 unit is an absolute idiot. I could easily justify betting 3-4 units in which case I would be up way more, but I'm obviously not doing that.

All you and some other haters have on me these days are my totals. Get over it. They sucked. I admit this. That's why I stopped playing them. And rest assured, I will add these back to my record pretty soon. I wanted to pad my regular wins a little bit. God forbid.

I respect all the cappers here and so should everyone else. At the end of the season you will see that I will be as good if not better than anyone else. This is not cockiness, it is reality. Only I know how successful my plays are so I can say this. And you are in no position to deny it given my success thus far.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 351
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by lanastasis:



What do you mean my record would be XXX if I was betting 1 unit? I'm not betting 1 unit and anyone with a proven track record who only bets 1 unit is an absolute idiot. I could easily justify betting 3-4 units in which case I would be up way more, but I'm obviously not doing that.

All you and some other haters have on me these days are my totals. Get over it. They sucked. I admit this. That's why I stopped playing them. And rest assured, I will add these back to my record pretty soon. I wanted to pad my regular wins a little bit. God forbid.

I respect all the cappers here and so should everyone else. At the end of the season you will see that I will be as good if not better than anyone else. This is not cockiness, it is reality. Only I know how successful my plays are so I can say this. And you are in no position to deny it given my success thus far.


lana - you know you and I get along, but this post was one of the weakest posts ever at covers. basically you are saying you wanted to pump up your internet persona and attract a few peoples by showing the nice record, even though it was bullshit. God forbid shouldve been used for what you were doing, not in reaction to what this kid said to you.

That is a very misleading and, imo, bullshit, practice lana.


All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.