A friend and fellow film enthusiast credits this movie with rejuvenating her inspired fondness for film after a period of disenchantment with the art form she had always so greatly venerated. I can understand why a lover of film would feel quenched after seeing The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. It is a feast of picturesque subtleties and a smorgasbord of hearty talent with a tangy finish of stylish flair which leaves the palette quivering with fulfillment. All in all, this movie is quite a meal for the senses for the film devotee which I wish that I would have seen on the big screen. However, with a few exceptions, I rarely find much enjoyment in westerns and even more rarely find it in biographical dramas. Nevertheless, I liked The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford quite a bit. A lot more than I thought that I would given my aforementioned tastes. Granted, it moves at its own pace and is in no way an intense and riveting action-packed shoot ‘em up type of gunslinger flick, so don’t go into it with that mindset. It is, nevertheless, an unyielding exemplar of fine direction, cinematography and, most noticeably, acting. Brad Pitt, Mary-Louise Parker and Sam Shepard display their paramount abilities quite well (which was not a shocker given their recognized abilities). The big surprise for me, was Casey Affleck, who was able to, with the most restrained moments of non-verbal communication, make the attentive viewers’ skin crawl by his deranged, yet entirely plausible performance. I enjoyed this movie and although it wasn’t my type of film in genre per se, and one I will likely see only once or twice in my life, it is difficult to locate many apparent blemishes within its complexion. Most great art, after all, transcends genre. And this is, without question, a work of art. Furthermore, there is a psychology to this film which surfaces within the study of its characters that is, to sum up in two words, must see.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
A friend and fellow film enthusiast credits this movie with rejuvenating her inspired fondness for film after a period of disenchantment with the art form she had always so greatly venerated. I can understand why a lover of film would feel quenched after seeing The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford. It is a feast of picturesque subtleties and a smorgasbord of hearty talent with a tangy finish of stylish flair which leaves the palette quivering with fulfillment. All in all, this movie is quite a meal for the senses for the film devotee which I wish that I would have seen on the big screen. However, with a few exceptions, I rarely find much enjoyment in westerns and even more rarely find it in biographical dramas. Nevertheless, I liked The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford quite a bit. A lot more than I thought that I would given my aforementioned tastes. Granted, it moves at its own pace and is in no way an intense and riveting action-packed shoot ‘em up type of gunslinger flick, so don’t go into it with that mindset. It is, nevertheless, an unyielding exemplar of fine direction, cinematography and, most noticeably, acting. Brad Pitt, Mary-Louise Parker and Sam Shepard display their paramount abilities quite well (which was not a shocker given their recognized abilities). The big surprise for me, was Casey Affleck, who was able to, with the most restrained moments of non-verbal communication, make the attentive viewers’ skin crawl by his deranged, yet entirely plausible performance. I enjoyed this movie and although it wasn’t my type of film in genre per se, and one I will likely see only once or twice in my life, it is difficult to locate many apparent blemishes within its complexion. Most great art, after all, transcends genre. And this is, without question, a work of art. Furthermore, there is a psychology to this film which surfaces within the study of its characters that is, to sum up in two words, must see.
It was to long and boring. I simply did not like it. Pitt did some good acting, but damm .. i simply did not have the energy to watch it all, and yet i did.
0
It was to long and boring. I simply did not like it. Pitt did some good acting, but damm .. i simply did not have the energy to watch it all, and yet i did.
It was to long and boring. I simply did not like it. Pitt did some good acting, but damm .. i simply did not have the energy to watch it all, and yet i did.
I can totally understand your point... this one isn't for everyone and it IS a bit long for a film with more dialogue than action. It just goes to show how subjective art can be… some can love a film or piece of music or painting, some don’t…. that’s why I love discussing this stuff…
Mikael99 and SirBarkley34… thanks for the input!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mikael99:
It was to long and boring. I simply did not like it. Pitt did some good acting, but damm .. i simply did not have the energy to watch it all, and yet i did.
I can totally understand your point... this one isn't for everyone and it IS a bit long for a film with more dialogue than action. It just goes to show how subjective art can be… some can love a film or piece of music or painting, some don’t…. that’s why I love discussing this stuff…
I just watched this yesterday and really enjoyed it. A well told story all around. Interesting historically, beautiful cinematography, and fine acting. Not sure I would include Mary-Louise Parker simply because her role was so limited.
0
I just watched this yesterday and really enjoyed it. A well told story all around. Interesting historically, beautiful cinematography, and fine acting. Not sure I would include Mary-Louise Parker simply because her role was so limited.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.