were there gay people before tv like mtv? if so, how could they choose to be gay? presumably,
History says there were nymphomaniac people that were very perverted in their mind and went so far as to have sex with the same gender.
they were influenced by seeing gay people having fun and assented to their whimsical nature
-what is fun is only an opinion
I'd be surprised if all the homosexuals would rise up against the straights in an apocalyptic battle. The ones I know are quite passive and small in stature. I wouldn't be worried if I were you.
The body can be deceiving. You soul is nothing but the truth.
I truly believe gayness is nothing more than a sexual-addiction problem.. Some people turn it into a personality disorder and end up devoting their whole life for sex/fornication.
I think this is the one statement I disagree with the most. I dont think the government has any business regulating our sex lives.
Think about it like this. If the government didn't regulate the population, they would be hurting everyone. Why would you want to bring a child into this world, if he is only going to cause others to suffer. It would only be fair that everyone follows the same regulations, or the entire country would suffer.
A good example is an aquarium.. if you have to many fish in a small space, they will become very stressed which causes them to get sick, concluding to the germ spreading and washing out the entire tank of fish.. be smart and be fair to the fish
Finally, I sent this link to a friend of mine to see what he thought. He saw that you've never met a homosexual and wanted to change that. He'd like to sit down, chat, maybe have sex and convince you that they're actually pretty cool. He also loves Taylor Swift, so you guys would probably hit it off.
Just stop.. i'm not interested in meeting sexually perverted people that devote their entire life to fornication and lust.
Taylor swift is a very talented person.. sexually perverted or not, you can still enjoy her music. Good luck with yourself
0
Quote Originally Posted by platypus:
wow, I cant believe what Im reading.
were there gay people before tv like mtv? if so, how could they choose to be gay? presumably,
History says there were nymphomaniac people that were very perverted in their mind and went so far as to have sex with the same gender.
they were influenced by seeing gay people having fun and assented to their whimsical nature
-what is fun is only an opinion
I'd be surprised if all the homosexuals would rise up against the straights in an apocalyptic battle. The ones I know are quite passive and small in stature. I wouldn't be worried if I were you.
The body can be deceiving. You soul is nothing but the truth.
I truly believe gayness is nothing more than a sexual-addiction problem.. Some people turn it into a personality disorder and end up devoting their whole life for sex/fornication.
I think this is the one statement I disagree with the most. I dont think the government has any business regulating our sex lives.
Think about it like this. If the government didn't regulate the population, they would be hurting everyone. Why would you want to bring a child into this world, if he is only going to cause others to suffer. It would only be fair that everyone follows the same regulations, or the entire country would suffer.
A good example is an aquarium.. if you have to many fish in a small space, they will become very stressed which causes them to get sick, concluding to the germ spreading and washing out the entire tank of fish.. be smart and be fair to the fish
Finally, I sent this link to a friend of mine to see what he thought. He saw that you've never met a homosexual and wanted to change that. He'd like to sit down, chat, maybe have sex and convince you that they're actually pretty cool. He also loves Taylor Swift, so you guys would probably hit it off.
Just stop.. i'm not interested in meeting sexually perverted people that devote their entire life to fornication and lust.
Taylor swift is a very talented person.. sexually perverted or not, you can still enjoy her music. Good luck with yourself
So, a topic about Taylor Swift is now a thread about homosexuality? Oh brother.
I am a fan of Taylor Swift, I think she is a great, great pop artist, she has some very good songs with excellent tempo and flow to them, very catchy. Her first album was damn good, and her 2nd was quite good as well.
Thank you for sticking to the subject.
You can't deny her talent. Her voice is the best female voice out there at this time .
It's like trying to deny Tiger Woods is the best golfer, shes the best at what she does (being beautiful doesn't hurt either)
0
Quote Originally Posted by electricladylnd:
So, a topic about Taylor Swift is now a thread about homosexuality? Oh brother.
I am a fan of Taylor Swift, I think she is a great, great pop artist, she has some very good songs with excellent tempo and flow to them, very catchy. Her first album was damn good, and her 2nd was quite good as well.
Thank you for sticking to the subject.
You can't deny her talent. Her voice is the best female voice out there at this time .
It's like trying to deny Tiger Woods is the best golfer, shes the best at what she does (being beautiful doesn't hurt either)
Awards mean absolutely nothing in the entire scheme of things. The inability to differentiate quality from success is what helps water down pop music's gene pool.
Dingle can say Swift is the best but there isn't any way of proving such a statement. It's just his opinion. Albeit, an opinion he can't back with any facts whatsoever.
I say Barry Williams is the best singer throughout the entire history of 20th century music. Prove me wrong.
0
Awards mean absolutely nothing in the entire scheme of things. The inability to differentiate quality from success is what helps water down pop music's gene pool.
Dingle can say Swift is the best but there isn't any way of proving such a statement. It's just his opinion. Albeit, an opinion he can't back with any facts whatsoever.
I say Barry Williams is the best singer throughout the entire history of 20th century music. Prove me wrong.
Awards mean absolutely nothing in the entire scheme of things. The inability to differentiate quality from success is what helps water down pop music's gene pool.
Dingle can say Swift is the best but there isn't any way of proving such a statement. It's just his opinion. Albeit, an opinion he can't back with any facts whatsoever.
I say Barry Williams is the best singer throughout the entire history of 20th century music. Prove me wrong.
Yes there is a way to prove it---
We just have to set a platform of individual qualities that are required to be a musical artist...and rate each individual quality to each individual artist...very simple--it's also done subconsciously, for which is how people state their favorite music---however, one can only judge artists that they have given a chance to be listened too.
Taylor Swift is the best all around---why?---She is the best in the most major quality that makes music, music----Sounds, for which Swift's voice is above all others---this is not an opinion, but a FACT
Voice Sound: #1---how do I know? The experiment here is to take musical artists and have them sing the same song----Taylor Swift's voice is more pleasant sounding then any other musical artist currently making music----I dare anyone to challenge this----and I dare anyone to listen to any cover song she has done, and to confidently, honestly state, her voice is not as pleasant to your ears as the other artist who sang the some tune----with exception to rap music, for which you must then have those rappers attempt to sing a Swift song---Eminem singing Love Story----
I get this is hard to accept from a stranger on a forum, but that does not change the fact that what I stated is truth----
to the ones that feel this and are not ashamed to admit this
to the ones that don't feel this, and can't give me a musical artist's voice that makes their ears happier than Taylor Swift's voice.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sugarhouse:
Awards mean absolutely nothing in the entire scheme of things. The inability to differentiate quality from success is what helps water down pop music's gene pool.
Dingle can say Swift is the best but there isn't any way of proving such a statement. It's just his opinion. Albeit, an opinion he can't back with any facts whatsoever.
I say Barry Williams is the best singer throughout the entire history of 20th century music. Prove me wrong.
Yes there is a way to prove it---
We just have to set a platform of individual qualities that are required to be a musical artist...and rate each individual quality to each individual artist...very simple--it's also done subconsciously, for which is how people state their favorite music---however, one can only judge artists that they have given a chance to be listened too.
Taylor Swift is the best all around---why?---She is the best in the most major quality that makes music, music----Sounds, for which Swift's voice is above all others---this is not an opinion, but a FACT
Voice Sound: #1---how do I know? The experiment here is to take musical artists and have them sing the same song----Taylor Swift's voice is more pleasant sounding then any other musical artist currently making music----I dare anyone to challenge this----and I dare anyone to listen to any cover song she has done, and to confidently, honestly state, her voice is not as pleasant to your ears as the other artist who sang the some tune----with exception to rap music, for which you must then have those rappers attempt to sing a Swift song---Eminem singing Love Story----
I get this is hard to accept from a stranger on a forum, but that does not change the fact that what I stated is truth----
to the ones that feel this and are not ashamed to admit this
to the ones that don't feel this, and can't give me a musical artist's voice that makes their ears happier than Taylor Swift's voice.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.