We took the in the POD yesterday, missing the UNDER in the Magic game by a 1/2 point!!! That's gambling. Not a completely lost night. Minimized our losses with the Suns win & the teaser. Overall losing 5 units......
2010 SYSTEM PLAYS 26-19 (58%) + 29 UNITS
2010 SYSTEM POD 8-7 (53%) -15 UNITS
2010 SYSTEM POM 1-0 (100%) +30 UNITS
2010 NON-SYSTEM PLAYS 38-30-1 (55%) +35 1/2 UNITS
Friday System Leans
Nets OVER ??? LOOKING AT OUR 2ND POM HERE
Rockets OVER 193 1/2
Nuggets OVER ???
Hawks -4
Hawks OVER 191
Non - System Leans
Bulls +4
Lakers -6
Bulls UNDER 197 1/2
Very early & as you can see waiting on lines. If the nets line looks right, I will be putting another 30 UNIT POM on it. Updates later as the lines come out.
Nets System was what we hit the other night with Portland OVER and our POM last month. Play on a team where there were a HOME DOG, & never trailed at any point after each qtr. winning SU. If they are 2 HOME IN THEIR NEXT GAME, the OVERcomes in @ 84.6%. Highest rated play that this system has.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
We took the in the POD yesterday, missing the UNDER in the Magic game by a 1/2 point!!! That's gambling. Not a completely lost night. Minimized our losses with the Suns win & the teaser. Overall losing 5 units......
2010 SYSTEM PLAYS 26-19 (58%) + 29 UNITS
2010 SYSTEM POD 8-7 (53%) -15 UNITS
2010 SYSTEM POM 1-0 (100%) +30 UNITS
2010 NON-SYSTEM PLAYS 38-30-1 (55%) +35 1/2 UNITS
Friday System Leans
Nets OVER ??? LOOKING AT OUR 2ND POM HERE
Rockets OVER 193 1/2
Nuggets OVER ???
Hawks -4
Hawks OVER 191
Non - System Leans
Bulls +4
Lakers -6
Bulls UNDER 197 1/2
Very early & as you can see waiting on lines. If the nets line looks right, I will be putting another 30 UNIT POM on it. Updates later as the lines come out.
Nets System was what we hit the other night with Portland OVER and our POM last month. Play on a team where there were a HOME DOG, & never trailed at any point after each qtr. winning SU. If they are 2 HOME IN THEIR NEXT GAME, the OVERcomes in @ 84.6%. Highest rated play that this system has.
I didn't play BOS@ATL, but I'm inclined to believe the Celtics will not allow themselves to be swept 0-4 this regular season. BOL
I understand your thinking, but some things are out of their control. Yankees are the best team in baseball, but always struggle against the Angels & Devil rays. Why? Atlanta owns Boston the last few years & boston knows it. Atlanta @ home, Boston on a B2B and with the way they pissed away a 13 point 4th qtr lead...........I'll take my chances with the low number. GL whichever way you go.
PS. I think a lot of people said the same thing about the Eagles against the Boys this year. "No way can they beat them 3x's in the same season"..............
0
Quote Originally Posted by Borat38:
I didn't play BOS@ATL, but I'm inclined to believe the Celtics will not allow themselves to be swept 0-4 this regular season. BOL
I understand your thinking, but some things are out of their control. Yankees are the best team in baseball, but always struggle against the Angels & Devil rays. Why? Atlanta owns Boston the last few years & boston knows it. Atlanta @ home, Boston on a B2B and with the way they pissed away a 13 point 4th qtr lead...........I'll take my chances with the low number. GL whichever way you go.
PS. I think a lot of people said the same thing about the Eagles against the Boys this year. "No way can they beat them 3x's in the same season"..............
Atl might be my pod..still looking...Everyone thought that the Spurs weren't going to get swept by the Jazz..especially on national tv and they lost...so it is possible
0
GL! AJ..Nice sneaky POM!...Like it
Atl might be my pod..still looking...Everyone thought that the Spurs weren't going to get swept by the Jazz..especially on national tv and they lost...so it is possible
yo is devin harris playing? i live in the cali bay area and watch the NETS play the WARRIORS... they were absolutely HORRID and couldn't find a bucket...... devin harris status uncertain? if he's out dunno who will put up enough points..
0
yo is devin harris playing? i live in the cali bay area and watch the NETS play the WARRIORS... they were absolutely HORRID and couldn't find a bucket...... devin harris status uncertain? if he's out dunno who will put up enough points..
yo is devin harris playing? i live in the cali bay area and watch the NETS play the WARRIORS... they were absolutely HORRID and couldn't find a bucket...... devin harris status uncertain? if he's out dunno who will put up enough points..
Keyon Dooling
G
35:43
7-13
2-4
2-2
0
2
2
8
2
2
2
0
18
Chris Douglas-Roberts
G
23:45
2-7
0-1
1-1
1
4
5
2
1
0
2
0
5
Yi Jianlian
F
14:54
3-6
0-0
0-0
1
1
2
1
5
1
0
0
6
Trenton Hassell
F
11:25
0-2
0-0
2-2
1
0
1
2
0
0
3
0
2
Brook Lopez
C
39:48
9-14
0-1
1-3
1
8
9
4
2
3
3
3
19
Terrence Williams
30:58
3-7
0-0
1-1
3
6
9
8
2
1
1
0
7
Kris Humphries
30:28
10-14
0-0
5-5
1
7
8
1
4
1
1
1
25
Jarvis Hayes
29:52
3-8
1-5
2-2
0
2
2
0
0
1
2
0
9
Chris Quinn
12:17
2-2
2-2
2-2
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
8
Tony Battie
9:29
2-4
0-0
0-0
0
3
3
1
3
1
1
0
4
Josh Boone
1:21
0-0
0-0
0-0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
they put up 103 against a Clippers team who I believe to be better than the wizards. Harris was out for this one. More players getting involved offensively without him, gl to you.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by G-PiCKS:
yo is devin harris playing? i live in the cali bay area and watch the NETS play the WARRIORS... they were absolutely HORRID and couldn't find a bucket...... devin harris status uncertain? if he's out dunno who will put up enough points..
Keyon Dooling
G
35:43
7-13
2-4
2-2
0
2
2
8
2
2
2
0
18
Chris Douglas-Roberts
G
23:45
2-7
0-1
1-1
1
4
5
2
1
0
2
0
5
Yi Jianlian
F
14:54
3-6
0-0
0-0
1
1
2
1
5
1
0
0
6
Trenton Hassell
F
11:25
0-2
0-0
2-2
1
0
1
2
0
0
3
0
2
Brook Lopez
C
39:48
9-14
0-1
1-3
1
8
9
4
2
3
3
3
19
Terrence Williams
30:58
3-7
0-0
1-1
3
6
9
8
2
1
1
0
7
Kris Humphries
30:28
10-14
0-0
5-5
1
7
8
1
4
1
1
1
25
Jarvis Hayes
29:52
3-8
1-5
2-2
0
2
2
0
0
1
2
0
9
Chris Quinn
12:17
2-2
2-2
2-2
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
8
Tony Battie
9:29
2-4
0-0
0-0
0
3
3
1
3
1
1
0
4
Josh Boone
1:21
0-0
0-0
0-0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
they put up 103 against a Clippers team who I believe to be better than the wizards. Harris was out for this one. More players getting involved offensively without him, gl to you.....
Thanks for clarifying that fellas, just trying to understand the system a little better. I want to tail you on this one but I don't want to jinx it for you, the last two times I tailed on big plays we've lost. Maybe I'll give it another try tonight!
Thanks and Good Luck!
0
Thanks for clarifying that fellas, just trying to understand the system a little better. I want to tail you on this one but I don't want to jinx it for you, the last two times I tailed on big plays we've lost. Maybe I'll give it another try tonight!
Thanks for clarifying that fellas, just trying to understand the system a little better. I want to tail you on this one but I don't want to jinx it for you, the last two times I tailed on big plays we've lost. Maybe I'll give it another try tonight!
Thanks and Good Luck!
So are you tailing?
0
Quote Originally Posted by bluntsmokin:
Thanks for clarifying that fellas, just trying to understand the system a little better. I want to tail you on this one but I don't want to jinx it for you, the last two times I tailed on big plays we've lost. Maybe I'll give it another try tonight!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.