GO CELTICS FOR THE GOLD BALL
In every of those series you mentioned, Boston played well in game one (won 2 of 3 and likely should have beat Cavs), but fact is they did not play well in game one against Lakers.
Ps- "the psychological game of who is boss" was set in game one."
In every of those series you mentioned, Boston played well in game one (won 2 of 3 and likely should have beat Cavs), but fact is they did not play well in game one against Lakers.
Ps- "the psychological game of who is boss" was set in game one."
no one thought that the celtics would lose to the heat. I personally thought that the celtics would beat the cavs as well as win againstr the magic in 6 or 7 games. BUT NOT THE LAKERS!!!!!
The Lakers are a more talented team than the celtics, its just that simple......
no one thought that the celtics would lose to the heat. I personally thought that the celtics would beat the cavs as well as win againstr the magic in 6 or 7 games. BUT NOT THE LAKERS!!!!!
The Lakers are a more talented team than the celtics, its just that simple......
- Game 1 between the Lakers and Celtics received the highest ratings in a Finals game since 2004. But with L.A. cruising to an easy victory and leading by 20 in the third quarter some viewers may elect to tune out for Game 2 Sunday. We all know Commissioner David Stern considers his league a business and will do anything he can to keep fans watching. The NBA Playoffs as a whole have been rather lackluster and this dream matchup definitely helps advertising, but if the home team blows out the other in every game it won’t keep an audience. David Stern's three marionettes on the court could aim to keep Sunday’s game closer than Lakers backers hope.
- Life was much too easy for Pau Gasol in Game 1 of the NBA Finals. And after what Gasol had to say about Kevin Garnett’s game to the media, don’t expect Boston to let him off easy. The Celtics controlled Dwight Howard in the Eastern Finals by using Glen Davis, Rasheed Wallace and Kendrick Perkins as goons to hack-a-Howard every time he got in the paint. Look for Doc Rivers’ gameplan to emulate that Sunday. More trips to the line could mean more points for Gasol (prop bet) or it could mean a lot of clock stoppage (over).
- Game 1 between the Lakers and Celtics received the highest ratings in a Finals game since 2004. But with L.A. cruising to an easy victory and leading by 20 in the third quarter some viewers may elect to tune out for Game 2 Sunday. We all know Commissioner David Stern considers his league a business and will do anything he can to keep fans watching. The NBA Playoffs as a whole have been rather lackluster and this dream matchup definitely helps advertising, but if the home team blows out the other in every game it won’t keep an audience. David Stern's three marionettes on the court could aim to keep Sunday’s game closer than Lakers backers hope.
- Life was much too easy for Pau Gasol in Game 1 of the NBA Finals. And after what Gasol had to say about Kevin Garnett’s game to the media, don’t expect Boston to let him off easy. The Celtics controlled Dwight Howard in the Eastern Finals by using Glen Davis, Rasheed Wallace and Kendrick Perkins as goons to hack-a-Howard every time he got in the paint. Look for Doc Rivers’ gameplan to emulate that Sunday. More trips to the line could mean more points for Gasol (prop bet) or it could mean a lot of clock stoppage (over).
no one thought that the celtics would lose to the heat. I personally thought that the celtics would beat the cavs as well as win againstr the magic in 6 or 7 games. BUT NOT THE LAKERS!!!!!
The Lakers are a more talented team than the celtics, its just that simple......
no one thought that the celtics would lose to the heat. I personally thought that the celtics would beat the cavs as well as win againstr the magic in 6 or 7 games. BUT NOT THE LAKERS!!!!!
The Lakers are a more talented team than the celtics, its just that simple......
the lakers were not favored 2 years ago what are you talking about?
the lakers were not favored 2 years ago what are you talking about?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.