I understand that Golden State is coming off a horrendous shooting night in a Home loss to the Nuggets, but Cleveland is well rested and obviously motivation will not be an issue. Cavs have been Underdogs 5 times this season and have covered the spread in all 5, while the Wariprs are 1-9-1 ATS in their last 11 vs. teams with .600+ winning percentage.
I love how Tristsan Thompson's presence goes under the radar, too.
In a game that may very well come down to the wire, I believe the value lies with the Cavaliers at +5.0
***Thunder ML***
After a very concerning stretch of games to start the season, OKC is finally developing chemistry as players settle into their roles.
Yes, they have a thin bench, but so does Houston.
A very strong home court on Christmas Day should be enough to get the win against a Rockets team who needs some time off to heal and regroup.
Best of luck, folks.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Merry Christmas everyone!
2 plays today, short and sweet.
***Cavaliers +5***
I understand that Golden State is coming off a horrendous shooting night in a Home loss to the Nuggets, but Cleveland is well rested and obviously motivation will not be an issue. Cavs have been Underdogs 5 times this season and have covered the spread in all 5, while the Wariprs are 1-9-1 ATS in their last 11 vs. teams with .600+ winning percentage.
I love how Tristsan Thompson's presence goes under the radar, too.
In a game that may very well come down to the wire, I believe the value lies with the Cavaliers at +5.0
***Thunder ML***
After a very concerning stretch of games to start the season, OKC is finally developing chemistry as players settle into their roles.
Yes, they have a thin bench, but so does Houston.
A very strong home court on Christmas Day should be enough to get the win against a Rockets team who needs some time off to heal and regroup.
Merry Christmas everyone! 2 plays today, short and sweet. ***Cavaliers +5*** I understand that Golden State is coming off a horrendous shooting night in a Home loss to the Nuggets, but Cleveland is well rested and obviously motivation will not be an issue. Cavs have been Underdogs 5 times this season and have covered the spread in all 5, while the Wariprs are 1-9-1 ATS in their last 11 vs. teams with .600+ winning percentage. I love how Tristsan Thompson's presence goes under the radar, too. In a game that may very well come down to the wire, I believe the value lies with the Cavaliers at +5.0 ***Thunder ML*** After a very concerning stretch of games to start the season, OKC is finally developing chemistry as players settle into their roles. Yes, they have a thin bench, but so does Houston. A very strong home court on Christmas Day should be enough to get the win against a Rockets team who needs some time off to heal and regroup. Best of luck, folks.
Cavs +5 @ -109
Thunder ML @ +110
*All plays are To Win 1unit at -109 unless otherwise indicated* (so risking a total of 1.99u today)
Sports Betting is not a get rich quick scheme, it has to be slow, steady profits... Like any good investment.
I won't have any 10unit "Bombs" (though occasionally a 2unit play) and you won't here me use the term "easy money"
0
Quote Originally Posted by AvidGuru:
Merry Christmas everyone! 2 plays today, short and sweet. ***Cavaliers +5*** I understand that Golden State is coming off a horrendous shooting night in a Home loss to the Nuggets, but Cleveland is well rested and obviously motivation will not be an issue. Cavs have been Underdogs 5 times this season and have covered the spread in all 5, while the Wariprs are 1-9-1 ATS in their last 11 vs. teams with .600+ winning percentage. I love how Tristsan Thompson's presence goes under the radar, too. In a game that may very well come down to the wire, I believe the value lies with the Cavaliers at +5.0 ***Thunder ML*** After a very concerning stretch of games to start the season, OKC is finally developing chemistry as players settle into their roles. Yes, they have a thin bench, but so does Houston. A very strong home court on Christmas Day should be enough to get the win against a Rockets team who needs some time off to heal and regroup. Best of luck, folks.
Cavs +5 @ -109
Thunder ML @ +110
*All plays are To Win 1unit at -109 unless otherwise indicated* (so risking a total of 1.99u today)
Sports Betting is not a get rich quick scheme, it has to be slow, steady profits... Like any good investment.
I won't have any 10unit "Bombs" (though occasionally a 2unit play) and you won't here me use the term "easy money"
What's the reasoning for the Utah pick? Think I sit tonight out, nothing stands out to me. Very small sample but hit all the picks that we're on the same side on, except Charlotte push.
0
What's the reasoning for the Utah pick? Think I sit tonight out, nothing stands out to me. Very small sample but hit all the picks that we're on the same side on, except Charlotte push.
Utah was just a lean at +6. I feel this is a legitimate letdown spot for Denver, Utah matches up well with Nuggets and are coming off a loss, and the Christmas Break sort of "levels the field'
Move to +5.5
I am more inclined to play the Under. For what it's worth, Under is 9-1 last 10 meetings.
For the most part I agree; it is not a sexy board tonight.
I've got a few other leans to finalize, then I will be releasing my Card.
0
Slevin
Utah was just a lean at +6. I feel this is a legitimate letdown spot for Denver, Utah matches up well with Nuggets and are coming off a loss, and the Christmas Break sort of "levels the field'
Move to +5.5
I am more inclined to play the Under. For what it's worth, Under is 9-1 last 10 meetings.
For the most part I agree; it is not a sexy board tonight.
I've got a few other leans to finalize, then I will be releasing my Card.
I dipped my toes into it and realized I should have been using it years ago!
Admittedly, I am not nearly as familiar with SDQL as I would like to be.
After reading your threads and some of the stats/trends you state, can see that you have used it a little.. PM if you want any help learning the code/language.. It does take sometime to learn it but I believe in keeping things simple. Some SDQL'ers got right into depth to far and look for that perfect angle but for me, its all about sample size and a high rate situation/angle.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AvidGuru:
Aussie
I dipped my toes into it and realized I should have been using it years ago!
Admittedly, I am not nearly as familiar with SDQL as I would like to be.
After reading your threads and some of the stats/trends you state, can see that you have used it a little.. PM if you want any help learning the code/language.. It does take sometime to learn it but I believe in keeping things simple. Some SDQL'ers got right into depth to far and look for that perfect angle but for me, its all about sample size and a high rate situation/angle.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.