Blazers only -2?!

Question

I can&#x27;t be the only questioning this suspiciously low line especially against a Nets team that just gave up 153 to the Kings.

dmoney1234 · Answer

I can&#x27;t be the only questioning this suspiciously low line especially against a Nets team that just gave up 153 to the Kings.

MLTaz92 · Answer

@dmoney1234&#xA; I have to agree.  Looking at Nets/Portland&#x27;s upcoming schedules I don&#x27;t see why Portland won&#x27;t win this.  Is Irving playing, maybe that is why?

Seahawks14 · Answer

How many do you want? -7?&#xA;Nets still have KD

dmoney1234 · Answer

@Seahawks14&#xA; yea, -7 would be about right.. you can&#x27;t realistically believe -2 makes sense when they just lost to the Kings by 32.. they still had KD for that too lol

Digitalkarma · Answer

Nets are still rated up there by the market they&#x27;re still overvalued despite the beatdown. Tbh, I thought this line would be -3.5. only reason Blazer was -8 the other day is they played an awful Spurs team wouldn&#x27;t make sense for the Nets to be &#x2B;7....

dubz4dummyz · Answer

Thought same about suns being &#x2B;2 vs golden state at home when GS was 0-7 on road

skillahmang · Answer

@dubz4dummyz&#xA; Exactly

Cavs2017Champs · Answer

Kings were -1.5 against the Nets and the Blazers are -2.5 against the Nets... You are telling me the Kings and Blazers are almost equal? This is a trap game and i am putting the Nets ML in a parlay... It is a free 50 dollar bet so it doesnt really matter.. But this line makes no sense..

Rana828 · Answer

@Cavs2017Champs&#xA; Scared money dont make money!  Parlaying with Durant over whatever total i can find

Blazers only -2?!

Hot Forum Topics