I pick so many games because I am trying to become a proficient capper. I've been testing out my how accurate my betting system is and I want a large sample size of games to see how often I can beat the given spread. Basically I've been calculating the most probable spread outcome and then betting against the given spread according to which end I had(If I have a -5.5 probable spread for a game and its -5 currently I would take the -5 line, alternatively I would take a +6 line.)
These analytics are a work in progress and I continually tweak the module and keep experimenting with different inputs while trying to improve the output results. These numbers are thoroughly analysed and have advanced algorithms in place to produce results, one edge is how the stats are converted to real life scenarios. Most stats come out as averages and it is important to adjust the median into the numbers to receive more accurate percentiles. A dog might show out to cover a +3.5 spread 55% of the time, but the favorite will cover -8.5 at a 45 percentile; with averages alone you will have an inflated spread line of -5 where you want it at about +4. There's lots of other factors in play like adjusting for momentum, mitigating outlier inflation, etc. So far I've had good success and I will continue toning my craft.
I was toying around with the O/U combo bets and pushing spreads according to different EV lines. It was very taxing work doing so many games every day, the total effort it took diminished away from the individual effort put on each line. This was more to experiment the module and it didn't perform that well in this department, especially in the O/Us. Either way I'm not sure, I will have to put more work into this for more conclusive results to figure out if these bets outpay vigless. Maybe with a new approach and formula these bets will be highly profitable, we'll see.
Also I have different rankings for quality of the bets so I usually make separate plays for the lines that seem like good value. I've had a few off days but its been mostly constitant, idk what you're really expecting. I've capped nearly 300 games in 20 days of betting, and managed to stay positive. I'm a bookies worst nightmare, I'll post a YTD soon. If you aren't expecting to lose then you shouldn't be gambling.
0
I pick so many games because I am trying to become a proficient capper. I've been testing out my how accurate my betting system is and I want a large sample size of games to see how often I can beat the given spread. Basically I've been calculating the most probable spread outcome and then betting against the given spread according to which end I had(If I have a -5.5 probable spread for a game and its -5 currently I would take the -5 line, alternatively I would take a +6 line.)
These analytics are a work in progress and I continually tweak the module and keep experimenting with different inputs while trying to improve the output results. These numbers are thoroughly analysed and have advanced algorithms in place to produce results, one edge is how the stats are converted to real life scenarios. Most stats come out as averages and it is important to adjust the median into the numbers to receive more accurate percentiles. A dog might show out to cover a +3.5 spread 55% of the time, but the favorite will cover -8.5 at a 45 percentile; with averages alone you will have an inflated spread line of -5 where you want it at about +4. There's lots of other factors in play like adjusting for momentum, mitigating outlier inflation, etc. So far I've had good success and I will continue toning my craft.
I was toying around with the O/U combo bets and pushing spreads according to different EV lines. It was very taxing work doing so many games every day, the total effort it took diminished away from the individual effort put on each line. This was more to experiment the module and it didn't perform that well in this department, especially in the O/Us. Either way I'm not sure, I will have to put more work into this for more conclusive results to figure out if these bets outpay vigless. Maybe with a new approach and formula these bets will be highly profitable, we'll see.
Also I have different rankings for quality of the bets so I usually make separate plays for the lines that seem like good value. I've had a few off days but its been mostly constitant, idk what you're really expecting. I've capped nearly 300 games in 20 days of betting, and managed to stay positive. I'm a bookies worst nightmare, I'll post a YTD soon. If you aren't expecting to lose then you shouldn't be gambling.
I bet I've made more with my strategies than you have placing inflated bullets on your limited bankroll on bad lines Also you are blind and somewhat brain dead if you haven't been able to pick out the winners from the last couple days, I mean how much more direct can it be??
0
I bet I've made more with my strategies than you have placing inflated bullets on your limited bankroll on bad lines Also you are blind and somewhat brain dead if you haven't been able to pick out the winners from the last couple days, I mean how much more direct can it be??
Wow great I wrote up some stats on the games that took me about 15 minutes to format and recollect and I hit that piece of garbage reset button and it cleared my post, seriously why the darn is that garbage there what garbage. The whole posting system is fucked you can only post quick replys and theres a friggin button that can clear all your work, sick bro nice design covers you friggin imbeciles. heres a garbage version of what I had written before:
LEAKERS: Both d's allow over 105ppg, pelicans 9-0-1 last 10 O/Us. *REF: O/U 205+ = 11-5; avg total = 210.8. Final score prediction: 107-115 I took juice out of the spread into the O/U as it seems more likely to hit
PORTLAND: Last 5 +/- avg: TOR= 3.8 , POR = 13.2 / LAST 10 SU= POR 9-1. REF: HOME ATS = 25-12, HOME AVG MARGIN = +4.6 (GOOD FOR SPREAD) REF#2: O/U 205+ = 10-3 (GOOD FOR OVER). Final score prediction: 108-102
0
Wow great I wrote up some stats on the games that took me about 15 minutes to format and recollect and I hit that piece of garbage reset button and it cleared my post, seriously why the darn is that garbage there what garbage. The whole posting system is fucked you can only post quick replys and theres a friggin button that can clear all your work, sick bro nice design covers you friggin imbeciles. heres a garbage version of what I had written before:
LEAKERS: Both d's allow over 105ppg, pelicans 9-0-1 last 10 O/Us. *REF: O/U 205+ = 11-5; avg total = 210.8. Final score prediction: 107-115 I took juice out of the spread into the O/U as it seems more likely to hit
PORTLAND: Last 5 +/- avg: TOR= 3.8 , POR = 13.2 / LAST 10 SU= POR 9-1. REF: HOME ATS = 25-12, HOME AVG MARGIN = +4.6 (GOOD FOR SPREAD) REF#2: O/U 205+ = 10-3 (GOOD FOR OVER). Final score prediction: 108-102
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.