All Forums | NBA Betting

Brooklyn Nets ML

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2206
Posts: 34
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #1
Philly is better team and will remain with better record in this series, however, Philly is not smart team!

They can't close this out WITH Embiid and surely won't do it without him! 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2017
Posts: 5577
Posted: #2
everyone on the nets. this will be fun
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4238
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by moosie00:

everyone on the nets. this will be fun
i never knew 27 % counts as everyone 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 45781
Posted: #4
Mayweather bet 450000 on
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by jflydaddy:

i never knew 27 % counts as everyone 
I think he means everyone on Covers... but i could be wrong lol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 4238
Posted: #6
so mesh your on nets 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 45781
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:

I think he means everyone on Covers... but i could be wrong lol

You've been wrong a lot lately....
Mayweather bet 450000 on
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 45781
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by jflydaddy:

so mesh your on nets 

1st quarter...1st half...Full game..
Mayweather bet 450000 on
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2017
Posts: 972
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:

Philly is better team and will remain with better record in this series, however, Philly is not smart team!

They can't close this out WITH Embiid and surely won't do it without him! 

how are they not smart? What an idiotic statement.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by FallopianTuber:


how are they not smart? What an idiotic statement.
F* you! 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2017
Posts: 972
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:

F* you! 

you just proved my point. Just making generalities yet if questioned, can’t provide facts to back up your dumb takes.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by FallopianTuber:


you just proved my point. Just making generalities yet if questioned, can’t provide facts to back up your dumb takes.
OK, stupid! For example got blowout in Game 1 by Nets! AT HOME! 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #13
And don't say, Game 1 is meaningless. Why didn't Boston lose to Pacers in Game 1?!?!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 34260
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:

Quote Originally Posted by FallopianTuber:

how are they not smart? What an idiotic statement.
F* you!

 

an_clap

 

A poster by the name of fallopian tuber call-n  your statement idiotic..lol.  Never have I seen him post anything but idiotic.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2017
Posts: 972
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:

OK, stupid! For example got blowout in Game 1 by Nets! AT HOME! 

shot 12% from 3 and missed 13 foul shots. Since then scored 145 and 131. So they lost because they were dumb? I genuinely feel bad for anyone that takes your picks seriously.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 34260
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by FallopianTuber:


shot 12% from 3 and missed 13 foul shots. Since then scored 145 and 131. So they lost because they were dumb? I genuinely feel bad for anyone that takes your picks seriously.

I feel bad for anyone that takes anything you say seriously..seriously
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by FallopianTuber:


shot 12% from 3 and missed 13 foul shots. Since then scored 145 and 131. So they lost because they were dumb? I genuinely feel bad for anyone that takes your picks seriously.
Why would you shoot 3' s if you don't make them that day? Only not smart teams do that!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2017
Posts: 972
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:

Why would you shoot 3' s if you don't make them that day? Only not smart teams do that!

You keep proving my point. Thank you. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by FallopianTuber:


You keep proving my point. Thank you. 
You don't have a point! You think you have a good point! That's different, you see?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:


1st quarter...1st half...Full game..
Cashed, cashed, FG pending...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2017
Posts: 972
Posted: #21
Good call, any other locks. Hahaha, you fraud.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 3175
Posted: #22

an_cheers

not a savior
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 21170
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by FallopianTuber:

Good call, any other locks. Hahaha, you fraud.
Nets leading entire game except in last two minutes... You see that 1 out of 100. Philly just got lucky! That's all.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2001
Posts: 19895
Posted: #24

I beg to differ Philly does not look like the better team lost the first game at home and were down 10 late in the 4th quarter before winning by 2.  And you lost if you took Brooklyn ml tough loss!

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 193
Posted: #25
I've lost 31 of my last 40 bets. And I was on the NETS. So...call me the cooler
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.