Play Under - All teams where the total is between 190 and 199.5 points poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in December games. 46-18 over the last 5 seasons. ( 71.9% 26.2 units ) 2-0 this year. ( 100.0% 2.0 units )
Atlanta/Denver (trade distraction +) under 198.5-199.5
Loved that Indian chicago total last night
oh my what a slow 1st q that was...
regards...
0
Hey how about this one before we get a correction
Play Under - All teams where the total is between 190 and 199.5 points poor rebounding team - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game, in December games. 46-18 over the last 5 seasons. ( 71.9% 26.2 units ) 2-0 this year. ( 100.0% 2.0 units )
Atlanta/Denver (trade distraction +) under 198.5-199.5
A quick look over tonight's card has me with a small lean on Knicks +7.5, and wish I was up overnight to scoop up Providence -4 in ncaa (big line overreaction imo to their top scorer being out, they adjusted reasonably without him in the 2nd half of their last game and Rhode Island is utter trash). Line was still -6 this morning, but I passed hoping I could catch 5 again. I'm not sharp obviously as line sits now at 7. May still play it here, but doubtful. BOL to everyone on their plays tonight.
0
Good morning and aloha.
A quick look over tonight's card has me with a small lean on Knicks +7.5, and wish I was up overnight to scoop up Providence -4 in ncaa (big line overreaction imo to their top scorer being out, they adjusted reasonably without him in the 2nd half of their last game and Rhode Island is utter trash). Line was still -6 this morning, but I passed hoping I could catch 5 again. I'm not sharp obviously as line sits now at 7. May still play it here, but doubtful. BOL to everyone on their plays tonight.
It's always nice to have a certain system that looks unbeatable when using a bullshit system.
One time I started 7-0 in NFL games that were at night, during a weekday, when I had a physics class on the following day.
One time I went something like 14-3 making bets strictly on criteria that the team(s)' logos met when deciding if I should bet the fav, the over, fad the dog or whatever.
0
Jigolo plays
It's always nice to have a certain system that looks unbeatable when using a bullshit system.
One time I started 7-0 in NFL games that were at night, during a weekday, when I had a physics class on the following day.
One time I went something like 14-3 making bets strictly on criteria that the team(s)' logos met when deciding if I should bet the fav, the over, fad the dog or whatever.
What kind of loser comes into a thread on an internet gambling forum and posts the above? It's comical and pathetic. Best of luck in the future buddy, the plays I make have nothing to do with a 'system' or the word 'jigolo'. You gotta be joking? Idiocy this ironic this often only on Covers.com.
Jigolo system play though : Lakers / Wizards Under 198.5 -110
0
8-8-1 -0.72u
What kind of loser comes into a thread on an internet gambling forum and posts the above? It's comical and pathetic. Best of luck in the future buddy, the plays I make have nothing to do with a 'system' or the word 'jigolo'. You gotta be joking? Idiocy this ironic this often only on Covers.com.
Jigolo system play though : Lakers / Wizards Under 198.5 -110
What kind of loser comes into a thread on an internet gambling forum and posts the above? It's comical and pathetic. Best of luck in the future buddy, the plays I make have nothing to do with a 'system' or the word 'jigolo'. You gotta be joking? Idiocy this ironic this often only on Covers.com.
Jigolo system play though : Lakers / Wizards Under 198.5 -110
Seriously? Coming from a guy making "Jigolo" plays.
You don't seem to get my point. I said it's nice to run good on a BS system while it lasts. I did that too. People on the internet can can their panties in the bunch so easily
0
Quote Originally Posted by Donnie_Baseball:
8-8-1 -0.72u
What kind of loser comes into a thread on an internet gambling forum and posts the above? It's comical and pathetic. Best of luck in the future buddy, the plays I make have nothing to do with a 'system' or the word 'jigolo'. You gotta be joking? Idiocy this ironic this often only on Covers.com.
Jigolo system play though : Lakers / Wizards Under 198.5 -110
Seriously? Coming from a guy making "Jigolo" plays.
You don't seem to get my point. I said it's nice to run good on a BS system while it lasts. I did that too. People on the internet can can their panties in the bunch so easily
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.