Oh no..
Well at least I'm not on Cleveland -2.5
Cleveland will win by 2
Dubs +2.5 is the better play I think
Oh no..
Well at least I'm not on Cleveland -2.5
Cleveland will win by 2
Dubs +2.5 is the better play I think
I wont be betting Golden State. I do like them to cover but I can't do it. Because I love cavs to win. So I decided not to over think this. Cavs ML is the only play here
I do feel it will be close. Dubs wont be blown out (getting beat by more than 3 for them might as well be considered a blowout!)
Unless I am right with my crazy new theory about steph going down in game 6, rather than game 7. People call me stupid yet I predicted correctly steph's playoff injury already. Now I am simply predicting a tweak of the injury. Sports is not hard to predict once you can see and correctly lock onto their script.
Of course we are human we are not always right. Like OKC series I thought OKC was advancing. But I wasn't 100% sure. And it turned out I was wrong with that idea....BUT the core idea of my play there was that CAVS would WIN IT ALL and GS would NOT.
So my theory is still alive. Cavs still have a chance to win it all.
I wont be betting Golden State. I do like them to cover but I can't do it. Because I love cavs to win. So I decided not to over think this. Cavs ML is the only play here
I do feel it will be close. Dubs wont be blown out (getting beat by more than 3 for them might as well be considered a blowout!)
Unless I am right with my crazy new theory about steph going down in game 6, rather than game 7. People call me stupid yet I predicted correctly steph's playoff injury already. Now I am simply predicting a tweak of the injury. Sports is not hard to predict once you can see and correctly lock onto their script.
Of course we are human we are not always right. Like OKC series I thought OKC was advancing. But I wasn't 100% sure. And it turned out I was wrong with that idea....BUT the core idea of my play there was that CAVS would WIN IT ALL and GS would NOT.
So my theory is still alive. Cavs still have a chance to win it all.
Nobody here has the true consensus on the matchup so none of us should really be arguing this point. I think its common sense the public will be chasing dubs. They RARELY lose 2 straight.
Yes, there will be a lot of people on Cleveland. For sure. But the majority of the money will be on the dubs and that is what counts
Let's say we have 99% on cavs, and each bettor is betting $5
But we have 1% on dubs and those bettors are betting $5,000
Where is all the money at? Clearly the dubs.
That is the situation we are in now. the actual consensus based on covers (which is somewhat accurate) is about 50/50 but the MONEY is on Dubs.
Cavs will win regardless....the books don't always take money from the public, gotta let em win sometimes obviously
But in this case consensus means nothing its more of "Who does the league want to win the championship this year"
The answer is obviously Cleveland.
Look, how many times has the league cared to script a game 7 in the finals? Not too often. So, what is different about this year? Nothing. They don't care about game 7. What they care about is making sure the cavs win (For LeBron and for Cleveland, and to make sure the whole WORLD doesn't cash their GS futures)
I might be one of the only people on this site who did not put in a single GS future bet all season.
Nobody here has the true consensus on the matchup so none of us should really be arguing this point. I think its common sense the public will be chasing dubs. They RARELY lose 2 straight.
Yes, there will be a lot of people on Cleveland. For sure. But the majority of the money will be on the dubs and that is what counts
Let's say we have 99% on cavs, and each bettor is betting $5
But we have 1% on dubs and those bettors are betting $5,000
Where is all the money at? Clearly the dubs.
That is the situation we are in now. the actual consensus based on covers (which is somewhat accurate) is about 50/50 but the MONEY is on Dubs.
Cavs will win regardless....the books don't always take money from the public, gotta let em win sometimes obviously
But in this case consensus means nothing its more of "Who does the league want to win the championship this year"
The answer is obviously Cleveland.
Look, how many times has the league cared to script a game 7 in the finals? Not too often. So, what is different about this year? Nothing. They don't care about game 7. What they care about is making sure the cavs win (For LeBron and for Cleveland, and to make sure the whole WORLD doesn't cash their GS futures)
I might be one of the only people on this site who did not put in a single GS future bet all season.
What did I say to make you think I would be on crack? You are wrong I can tell you that. Never smoked crack, lol.
What I said was FACT (Rhymes with crack if you're black lol)
What did I say to make you think I would be on crack? You are wrong I can tell you that. Never smoked crack, lol.
What I said was FACT (Rhymes with crack if you're black lol)
Plus I proved your argument HOLDS NO WATER
What if you were right and public was on cavs? So what. You really think the books are going to take the public's money on every game? I know you don't believe that...
So stop worrying about consensus here and try to figure out who NBA wants to advance. That's all you need to do.
Plus I proved your argument HOLDS NO WATER
What if you were right and public was on cavs? So what. You really think the books are going to take the public's money on every game? I know you don't believe that...
So stop worrying about consensus here and try to figure out who NBA wants to advance. That's all you need to do.
I wont be betting Golden State. I do like them to cover but I can't do it. Because I love cavs to win. So I decided not to over think this. Cavs ML is the only play here
I do feel it will be close. Dubs wont be blown out (getting beat by more than 3 for them might as well be considered a blowout!)
Unless I am right with my crazy new theory about steph going down in game 6, rather than game 7. People call me stupid yet I predicted correctly steph's playoff injury already. Now I am simply predicting a tweak of the injury. Sports is not hard to predict once you can see and correctly lock onto their script.
Of course we are human we are not always right. Like OKC series I thought OKC was advancing. But I wasn't 100% sure. And it turned out I was wrong with that idea....BUT the core idea of my play there was that CAVS would WIN IT ALL and GS would NOT.
So my theory is still alive. Cavs still have a chance to win it all.
I wont be betting Golden State. I do like them to cover but I can't do it. Because I love cavs to win. So I decided not to over think this. Cavs ML is the only play here
I do feel it will be close. Dubs wont be blown out (getting beat by more than 3 for them might as well be considered a blowout!)
Unless I am right with my crazy new theory about steph going down in game 6, rather than game 7. People call me stupid yet I predicted correctly steph's playoff injury already. Now I am simply predicting a tweak of the injury. Sports is not hard to predict once you can see and correctly lock onto their script.
Of course we are human we are not always right. Like OKC series I thought OKC was advancing. But I wasn't 100% sure. And it turned out I was wrong with that idea....BUT the core idea of my play there was that CAVS would WIN IT ALL and GS would NOT.
So my theory is still alive. Cavs still have a chance to win it all.
Well coming from you, that's a compliment. I am not one to judge people (Already learned that spiritual lesson) so I can see you are not past that stage yet.
But I don't even see what I said that was wrong? I see nothing at all in the post that even remotely hints at me being a bad person
I said FACT rhymed with CRACK (But it really doesn't unless you're BLACK!) and see black and crack rhyme. So it was just a clever post, nothing more.
IF somehow you thought I was being racist in any way form or fashion, then once again it just goes to show your stupidity
You don't know me, I happen to have all black friends. I don't discriminate against any race but I just get along with black people better.
Well coming from you, that's a compliment. I am not one to judge people (Already learned that spiritual lesson) so I can see you are not past that stage yet.
But I don't even see what I said that was wrong? I see nothing at all in the post that even remotely hints at me being a bad person
I said FACT rhymed with CRACK (But it really doesn't unless you're BLACK!) and see black and crack rhyme. So it was just a clever post, nothing more.
IF somehow you thought I was being racist in any way form or fashion, then once again it just goes to show your stupidity
You don't know me, I happen to have all black friends. I don't discriminate against any race but I just get along with black people better.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.