Bad beat with the Celtics going to OT still not a bad night. TNT Thursday sure gives you the weirdest line. I only got one for Thursday.
Portland Trailblazers +1.5 Blazers have this Rose Garden magic that either makes them really good or make their opponents look bad. Clippers' schedule should get to the playing the 5th game in 7 nights. It's the beginning of the season but if effects of a 3g/4n can be seen in other teams, why can't a 5/7? I see a rested Portland getting the W here through dominating the glass and keeping their TOs low. They've been really good and not turning the ball over in their first few games and should be more effecient playing comfortably at home. It is also good catching the Blazers with a 2 days off because they'd need a lot from their starters. Clippers have a very good bench and could give the Blazers a lot of problem but hopefully we could see fatigue come the later parts of the game.
Honorable Mentions: Oklahoma City -1.5 - Pretty weird line but what the heck.
OKC/CHI UNDER 201.5 - If you can get 201 that is. I'm seeing 191 in every other books. Both teams score 90 easy in their games while allowing almost the same amount. I see either a 93-90 or a 98-92 type of final score here.
BOL.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Bad beat with the Celtics going to OT still not a bad night. TNT Thursday sure gives you the weirdest line. I only got one for Thursday.
Portland Trailblazers +1.5 Blazers have this Rose Garden magic that either makes them really good or make their opponents look bad. Clippers' schedule should get to the playing the 5th game in 7 nights. It's the beginning of the season but if effects of a 3g/4n can be seen in other teams, why can't a 5/7? I see a rested Portland getting the W here through dominating the glass and keeping their TOs low. They've been really good and not turning the ball over in their first few games and should be more effecient playing comfortably at home. It is also good catching the Blazers with a 2 days off because they'd need a lot from their starters. Clippers have a very good bench and could give the Blazers a lot of problem but hopefully we could see fatigue come the later parts of the game.
Honorable Mentions: Oklahoma City -1.5 - Pretty weird line but what the heck.
OKC/CHI UNDER 201.5 - If you can get 201 that is. I'm seeing 191 in every other books. Both teams score 90 easy in their games while allowing almost the same amount. I see either a 93-90 or a 98-92 type of final score here.
Curious about the Portland pick. Don't you think that LAC's bench will be a factor and pull out a win against Portland considering they don't really use their (horrible) bench much?
I agree with the OKC@CHI line being fishy but I might just ride the Thunder.
LAC's bench is a huge factor that's why it's good the Blazers get 2 days off. If it were a day or they are off a back-to-back game this will be a no wager. Portland really needs their starter to do the damage since they could barely get any off their bench.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dinosaur_King:
Long time fan, CMM!
Curious about the Portland pick. Don't you think that LAC's bench will be a factor and pull out a win against Portland considering they don't really use their (horrible) bench much?
I agree with the OKC@CHI line being fishy but I might just ride the Thunder.
LAC's bench is a huge factor that's why it's good the Blazers get 2 days off. If it were a day or they are off a back-to-back game this will be a no wager. Portland really needs their starter to do the damage since they could barely get any off their bench.
I HAD MEMPHIS LAST NIGHT BIG, MILK. I WAS DISAPPOINTED ON YOUR LEAN. I NEED YOU WITH ME AT ALL TIMES. JUST KIDDING. LET ME JUST SAY I THINK YOU HAVE THE PORTLAND GAME CAPPED purrrrrrrrrrrrFECTLY. CLIPS FOUR GAMES IN FIVE NIGHTS AND FIVE IN SEVEN. HISTORICALLY THE BLAZERS GIVE CLIPS DIFFICULTY. I'M FEARFUL OF THE CLEVELAND LOSS AWAKENING THE GIANT IN THE CLIPPERS. BUT AS YOU POINTED OUT THE BLAZERS COACH STOTS KNOWS HIS TEAMS SECOND TEAM DIFICIENCIES AND PLAYS HIS YOUNG STARTERS LONG MINUTES. GO BLAZERS. BTW, ZEBO LOOKS HIS SMOOTH SHOOTING FORM OF TWO YEARS AGO WHEN GAY WAS OUT. TONY ALLEN IS, AS THE NBA GENERAL MANAGERS STATED, THE BEST ON BALL DEFENDER IN THE LEAGUE. MEMPHIS, IF THEIR TOP FIVE STAY HEALTH, ARE GOING TO BE A FORCE. THE BAYLESS PICKUP WAS BIG.
0
I HAD MEMPHIS LAST NIGHT BIG, MILK. I WAS DISAPPOINTED ON YOUR LEAN. I NEED YOU WITH ME AT ALL TIMES. JUST KIDDING. LET ME JUST SAY I THINK YOU HAVE THE PORTLAND GAME CAPPED purrrrrrrrrrrrFECTLY. CLIPS FOUR GAMES IN FIVE NIGHTS AND FIVE IN SEVEN. HISTORICALLY THE BLAZERS GIVE CLIPS DIFFICULTY. I'M FEARFUL OF THE CLEVELAND LOSS AWAKENING THE GIANT IN THE CLIPPERS. BUT AS YOU POINTED OUT THE BLAZERS COACH STOTS KNOWS HIS TEAMS SECOND TEAM DIFICIENCIES AND PLAYS HIS YOUNG STARTERS LONG MINUTES. GO BLAZERS. BTW, ZEBO LOOKS HIS SMOOTH SHOOTING FORM OF TWO YEARS AGO WHEN GAY WAS OUT. TONY ALLEN IS, AS THE NBA GENERAL MANAGERS STATED, THE BEST ON BALL DEFENDER IN THE LEAGUE. MEMPHIS, IF THEIR TOP FIVE STAY HEALTH, ARE GOING TO BE A FORCE. THE BAYLESS PICKUP WAS BIG.
LAC's bench is a huge factor that's why it's good the Blazers get 2 days off. If it were a day or they are off a back-to-back game this will be a no wager. Portland really needs their starter to do the damage since they could barely get any off their bench.
This is why LAC will win, they looked great last night. They may be tired tonight but their roster is so deep.
BOL CMM but I'm going against you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CrazyMilkMan:
LAC's bench is a huge factor that's why it's good the Blazers get 2 days off. If it were a day or they are off a back-to-back game this will be a no wager. Portland really needs their starter to do the damage since they could barely get any off their bench.
This is why LAC will win, they looked great last night. They may be tired tonight but their roster is so deep.
CMM's honorable mention's are hitting about 25% of the time. If you combine that with his "real" picks then his posted plays are hitting below 40%! Important information to any of those looking to his posted plays for help! Prob would look somewhere else!
0
CMM's honorable mention's are hitting about 25% of the time. If you combine that with his "real" picks then his posted plays are hitting below 40%! Important information to any of those looking to his posted plays for help! Prob would look somewhere else!
Hey man. Those who are regularly visiting my threads do know that they are "leans". And i'm not asking people to follow my play that's why I do not even bother posting my record.
My thread is more of a place you check out what i think and ask questions or post your insight and get a discussion going.
0
@AYDENZPIX
Hey man. Those who are regularly visiting my threads do know that they are "leans". And i'm not asking people to follow my play that's why I do not even bother posting my record.
My thread is more of a place you check out what i think and ask questions or post your insight and get a discussion going.
That 201 line was never opened at Pinnacle. It opened at 191.5 for OKC/CHI and 201.5 for LAC POR. Not sure where you got that number from. In any case, GL.
0
Hey cmm, thx for picks.
That 201 line was never opened at Pinnacle. It opened at 191.5 for OKC/CHI and 201.5 for LAC POR. Not sure where you got that number from. In any case, GL.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.