By Inquirer Sports Staff, Cedelf P. Tupas, Jasmine W. Payo, Francis Thimsel J. Ochoa Philippine Daily Inquirer First Posted 05:03:00 07/07/2009
(Second of four parts)
MANILA, Philippines—Game fixing in the country’s premier varsity leagues first came under public spotlight in August 2007, when agents of the National Bureau of Investigation arrested Paolo Orbeta, the College of St. Benilde starting point guard.
“I got a text message that day that something happened to one of our guys,” said Henry Atayde, the school’s representative to the management committee of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).
Police had called a press conference and the college sent a lawyer to represent Orbeta.
“The charges were very clear on paper. It was game fixing,” Atayde said.
Orbeta had been nailed in an entrapment operation. A day after his arrest, the school struck him out of the Blazers’ lineup. The case was later dismissed after the complainant, described as a student-preying loan shark, failed to show up during the hearings.
Atayde said Orbeta completed his studies at St. Benilde. He now works in a call center.
During last year’s NCAA playoffs, a key player of a Final Four team was summoned to the headquarters of the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group for questioning and later sent home.
School officials then denied that the player was picked up by police, or that he was interrogated about his underwhelming performances in crucial games. A police source later said details of the inquiry were not disclosed for fear of possible diplomatic repercussions.
More recently, an NCAA official confirmed that the player concerned faced investigation after a subpar game. “He was picked up to scare him or something because [school officials] felt he was doing something.”
Scary phone call
The same official said he became aware of the presence of game fixers in the league when unidentified people contacted him while his team was in contention for a Final Four slot.
“A guy started talking to me about a game that we were about to play. I thought it was the press,” the official said.
“And then he said, ‘Do you really want to reach the Final Four? For P50,000 two players are going to drop the game.’ He even named the players,” he added.
“It was scary. The mere fact that they knew me and they called me, I was a bit afraid.”
Atayde told the Inquirer that the NCAA had been looking into game- fixing allegations as early as Season 81 (2005) at Rizal Memorial Coliseum.
“You know who the fans are,” Atayde said. “You have die-hard fans who are there every game. But we noticed a group of people who were not students. Some were muscled, some were big-bodied.”
“The one thing we noticed, for example, during a critical San Beda-Letran game, was that they would switch sides. In NCAA terms, that would be suicide. They also didn’t react. They just sat down, watched the games and kept on text-messaging.”
Slush fund
Concerned, NCAA officials called the NBI, which fielded agents at the Rizal Memorial Coliseum. The shady characters disappeared, but the illegal gambling syndicate preying on the varsity leagues remained and appeared to be always a step ahead of authorities.
And the reason is simple. Money, big money, makes the gambling world go ’round freely.
Because gambling is a game of chance, game fixers hope to tilt the odds somewhat by trying to gain some control over the game. The best way to ensure the safety of one’s bet is to allocate part of the projected earnings as a “slush fund” of sorts.
And the math involved is mind-boggling.
“Sometimes, a player can fetch P100,000 for even an elimination round game,” said the Inquirer’s player source, a former standout.
Imagine the stakes when it is the Final Four, or even the championship.
Ateneo de Manila University athletic director Ricky Palou told the Inquirer that as much as P200 million to P300 million in bets can go around in just one season—barely three months of college basketball action.
Who are involved?
Palou mentioned several suspects, including a player in another school who had been caught in the act, too, and was suspended. He had been under surveillance after he was seen being fetched by men in expensive cars.
“The way I heard it, players were asked to turn in their cell phones,” Palou said.
“And he (player) had a second cell phone that he didn’t turn in and that’s how he was caught. The way he was playing, also. He played brilliantly in one game then all of a sudden he played really bad.”
An official of the Universities Athletic Association of the Philippines (UAAP), asked if he knew players involved in game fixing without being told about Palou’s list, mentioned specifically the same two players Palou named.
“The (list of) names, it’s like an urban legend,” Atayde said. “Mostly it’s amateurs because if you try to fix games in the PBA, you’ll have to buy players a car or something like that. With student [athletes] they say that one cell phone and a few thousand [pesos] and they’re happy already. But it’s very hard to pinpoint if there’s something going on.”
“I suppose it would be the kids who are not well off who are prone to it,” Palou said. “But I’m not excluding the fact that the rich kids do it because they gamble also.”
0
Player caught in trap allowed to go scot-free
By Inquirer Sports Staff, Cedelf P. Tupas, Jasmine W. Payo, Francis Thimsel J. Ochoa Philippine Daily Inquirer First Posted 05:03:00 07/07/2009
(Second of four parts)
MANILA, Philippines—Game fixing in the country’s premier varsity leagues first came under public spotlight in August 2007, when agents of the National Bureau of Investigation arrested Paolo Orbeta, the College of St. Benilde starting point guard.
“I got a text message that day that something happened to one of our guys,” said Henry Atayde, the school’s representative to the management committee of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).
Police had called a press conference and the college sent a lawyer to represent Orbeta.
“The charges were very clear on paper. It was game fixing,” Atayde said.
Orbeta had been nailed in an entrapment operation. A day after his arrest, the school struck him out of the Blazers’ lineup. The case was later dismissed after the complainant, described as a student-preying loan shark, failed to show up during the hearings.
Atayde said Orbeta completed his studies at St. Benilde. He now works in a call center.
During last year’s NCAA playoffs, a key player of a Final Four team was summoned to the headquarters of the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group for questioning and later sent home.
School officials then denied that the player was picked up by police, or that he was interrogated about his underwhelming performances in crucial games. A police source later said details of the inquiry were not disclosed for fear of possible diplomatic repercussions.
More recently, an NCAA official confirmed that the player concerned faced investigation after a subpar game. “He was picked up to scare him or something because [school officials] felt he was doing something.”
Scary phone call
The same official said he became aware of the presence of game fixers in the league when unidentified people contacted him while his team was in contention for a Final Four slot.
“A guy started talking to me about a game that we were about to play. I thought it was the press,” the official said.
“And then he said, ‘Do you really want to reach the Final Four? For P50,000 two players are going to drop the game.’ He even named the players,” he added.
“It was scary. The mere fact that they knew me and they called me, I was a bit afraid.”
Atayde told the Inquirer that the NCAA had been looking into game- fixing allegations as early as Season 81 (2005) at Rizal Memorial Coliseum.
“You know who the fans are,” Atayde said. “You have die-hard fans who are there every game. But we noticed a group of people who were not students. Some were muscled, some were big-bodied.”
“The one thing we noticed, for example, during a critical San Beda-Letran game, was that they would switch sides. In NCAA terms, that would be suicide. They also didn’t react. They just sat down, watched the games and kept on text-messaging.”
Slush fund
Concerned, NCAA officials called the NBI, which fielded agents at the Rizal Memorial Coliseum. The shady characters disappeared, but the illegal gambling syndicate preying on the varsity leagues remained and appeared to be always a step ahead of authorities.
And the reason is simple. Money, big money, makes the gambling world go ’round freely.
Because gambling is a game of chance, game fixers hope to tilt the odds somewhat by trying to gain some control over the game. The best way to ensure the safety of one’s bet is to allocate part of the projected earnings as a “slush fund” of sorts.
And the math involved is mind-boggling.
“Sometimes, a player can fetch P100,000 for even an elimination round game,” said the Inquirer’s player source, a former standout.
Imagine the stakes when it is the Final Four, or even the championship.
Ateneo de Manila University athletic director Ricky Palou told the Inquirer that as much as P200 million to P300 million in bets can go around in just one season—barely three months of college basketball action.
Who are involved?
Palou mentioned several suspects, including a player in another school who had been caught in the act, too, and was suspended. He had been under surveillance after he was seen being fetched by men in expensive cars.
“The way I heard it, players were asked to turn in their cell phones,” Palou said.
“And he (player) had a second cell phone that he didn’t turn in and that’s how he was caught. The way he was playing, also. He played brilliantly in one game then all of a sudden he played really bad.”
An official of the Universities Athletic Association of the Philippines (UAAP), asked if he knew players involved in game fixing without being told about Palou’s list, mentioned specifically the same two players Palou named.
“The (list of) names, it’s like an urban legend,” Atayde said. “Mostly it’s amateurs because if you try to fix games in the PBA, you’ll have to buy players a car or something like that. With student [athletes] they say that one cell phone and a few thousand [pesos] and they’re happy already. But it’s very hard to pinpoint if there’s something going on.”
“I suppose it would be the kids who are not well off who are prone to it,” Palou said. “But I’m not excluding the fact that the rich kids do it because they gamble also.”
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
