All Forums | NBA Betting

Don't consider yourself a good capper if you had either one of these plays...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2577
Posts: 58
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 130
Posted: #26
Me as well Crow...After last weeks beating in MLB especially the 7 run comeback in the Braves game, I will take this win.  Good luck tomorrow
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by wizardofroz:

 Congrats.  One of my gambling theories is if you are ever in doubt on who to bet on, take the OVER or the dog.  It worked wonders for you tonight.

Like I said in my thread, I felt if Orlando was going to win, the over would probably hit as well. Those 2 plays seemed to go hand in hand with each other. IMO.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by SaucyMixx:

Me as well Crow...After last weeks beating in MLB especially the 7 run comeback in the Braves game, I will take this win.  Good luck tomorrow

I got fucked in a 4 game Parlay that same day when Seattle blew it in the 9th.

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 21183
Posted: #29
Nothing wrong with getting lucky.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2540
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by NEWPORT:

Your WALLET and BANK ROLL is how you MEASURE gambling success!

damn

LOL but, I will take the lucky win tonight.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 480
Posted: #31
o.t. helped you but hurt my unders...i read your thread before the game and consided changing my total play  but didn't.....congrats on your plays
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 130
Posted: #32
Yup 4-1 Bot of 9th Had that as well.  I have to pay local 10 dimes tomorrow.  Part of that was Doc Halladay losing 2 games last week, I'm just trying to forget last week and move on.  Start the week right.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 130
Posted: #33
Do you play a ton of MLB cuz Im leaning Bos and Yanks tomorrow
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 480
Posted: #34
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #35

Quote Originally Posted by SaucyMixx:

Do you play a ton of MLB cuz Im leaning Bos and Yanks tomorrow

Yeah I do.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 130
Posted: #36
Maybe we can exchange ideas or I'll look out for your threads.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 480
Posted: #37
how about oakland and cincy?  dont play alot of totals but s.d. under is tempting
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #38

I went 0-3 in Puck's Office pool today... I was 1 win behind Weeble(But 1200 units) for the win lead.  Which doesn't matter because units are what count.

My only MLB play that I played (For Money) was the Sox/Rays Boxscore Over 28.5 for $75.

Lost that one too.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 389
Posted: #39
good pops, had 188 felt burned and lucky many times during this game.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 480
Posted: #40
sal     that is a freakin hilarious pic
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #41

Quote Originally Posted by razorsedge:

sal     that is a freakin hilarious pic

That is my favorite band.

Still remember watching the video debut of Thunderstruck on MTV.

Airbourne is taking off where AC/DC have bowed out.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 480
Posted: #42
have an airbourne cd..very good band..just seen ac/dc here in omaha nebraska last year and seen them about a month ago in des moines iowa. still kick freakin ass      them old bastards still got.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #43

I have both of Airbourne's CD's and those guys kick ass.

 I've seen AC/DC 5 times now live. Unreal energy in their shows.

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by Crowkillers:

Consider yourself EXTREMELY lucky.

05/24 06:23 PM 130154134- 1 Total $85.00 $77.27 Basketball NBA - Orlando Magic @ Boston CelticsTotal O 187½ -110 for Game

05/24 06:18 PM 130158991- 1 2 team Parlay $15.00 $99.55 Basketball NBA - Orlando Magic +300 for Game Basketball NBA - Orlando Magic @ Boston CelticsTotal O 187½ -110 for Game


Well if your talking about the over in both those bets, of course OT saved you. But then you should just say: if you hit the over you were lucky.

But the +300 Magic bet was for certain the correct side. Did Magic almost choke a game away they had won several times?...of course...but Boston's biggest lead the whole night was TWO (I believe)...therefore, there was very little luck in being ballsy and backing a desperate Magic team in Boston...

Nice hit
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 480
Posted: #45
i would like to see ac/dc come around  the nebraska area again. i dont know if airbourne gets out of the aussie area at all but like their sound and would like to see them live to see what they bring.  they remind me of the bon scott era which i like alot more than brian johnson...dont  get me wrong brian is good....seen a band at a local bar here in omaha, called hells bells seen them twice once with a brian johnson singer and once with a bon scott cover.......WOW  great bon scott cover.. i think they are out of tenn.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2219
Posted: #46
pfff over was lucky... Magic ML or ATS no way
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 1585
Posted: #47
Magic =
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #48

I don't know about the Magic ML not being lucky. It was in jeopardy with 8 seconds left. I was shocked that the Celts didn't take a time out to set up a play.

If they hit the final shot, the game is over, instead they bumble around and let the game get to OT and blow it.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


Well if your talking about the over in both those bets, of course OT saved you. But then you should just say: if you hit the over you were lucky.

But the +300 Magic bet was for certain the correct side. Did Magic almost choke a game away they had won several times?...of course...but Boston's biggest lead the whole night was TWO (I believe)...therefore, there was very little luck in being ballsy and backing a desperate Magic team in Boston...

Nice hit

 

i suppose if you want to argue that the winning side is always the correct side, then that can't really be argued...

but otherwise your statement holds no water... Magic played about as flawless as they can possibly play, got the benefit of having all 8 of Boston's primary players in foul trouble, got subpar games out of Pierce, KG, Perkins and Rondo... and it still took OT...

yes, it was ballsy... yes, it won...

no, nobody who had that bet should be doing anything except thanking their lucky stars for the victory...

 

it was a +300 bet that had about a 1 in 10 chance of hitting... all the stars had to align, and they did...

Crow has it right, as usual...

 

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:

 

i suppose if you want to argue that the winning side is always the correct side, then that can't really be argued...

but otherwise your statement holds no water... Magic played about as flawless as they can possibly play, got the benefit of having all 8 of Boston's primary players in foul trouble, got subpar games out of Pierce, KG, Perkins and Rondo... and it still took OT...

yes, it was ballsy... yes, it won...

no, nobody who had that bet should be doing anything except thanking their lucky stars for the victory...

 

it was a +300 bet that had about a 1 in 10 chance of hitting... all the stars had to align, and they did...

Crow has it right, as usual...

 

thank their lucky stars if they had the Magic? 

so if that last shot by Rondo goes down and the Celts win by 2 in regulation the Celts would have been the correct side?

Or would Celts backers have thanked your lucky stars then????

Or course they WOULD HAVE!

They trailed virtually the entire game and the Magic didn't score for almost 11 minutes outside of JJ!

So both sides were lucky sides?

No sir. Orlando was the right side last night and it hit, and that is not ignoring the Magic choking in Regulation and OT.
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.