Not sure if anyone has tracked this before or not,if so I apologize for the repetition and also i mean no disrespect to any of the other members whose picks I am fading, it is my belief that the odds are against you to keep picking winners, i have done this in the past and its worked ok, not sure if it was just coincidence or a pattern since i did not do it consistently enough...so im just going to put enough to win 1 unit on every play
I'm just going to post the plays i am making (which will be the opposite of what is picked by the top people in survivor)....going to do this for at least the rest of February
Feel free to chime in on whatever you like
WED FEB9 Picks:
All are 1.1 to win 1 NBA Dal vs Sac UNDER 196 Toronto +7 Phil +1
NCAA BSK Drexel -3.5
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Not sure if anyone has tracked this before or not,if so I apologize for the repetition and also i mean no disrespect to any of the other members whose picks I am fading, it is my belief that the odds are against you to keep picking winners, i have done this in the past and its worked ok, not sure if it was just coincidence or a pattern since i did not do it consistently enough...so im just going to put enough to win 1 unit on every play
I'm just going to post the plays i am making (which will be the opposite of what is picked by the top people in survivor)....going to do this for at least the rest of February
Feel free to chime in on whatever you like
WED FEB9 Picks:
All are 1.1 to win 1 NBA Dal vs Sac UNDER 196 Toronto +7 Phil +1
(i may quit using / throw out the hockey bets or look at them seperately since it seems alot of the survivor picks are under 5.5 goals no matter the situation)
also adding that other than my survivor picks and the few dollars i have built up on centsports.com i'm not betting these games, just tracking them and doing it on here so its a little more fun and others can chime in
0
(i may quit using / throw out the hockey bets or look at them seperately since it seems alot of the survivor picks are under 5.5 goals no matter the situation)
also adding that other than my survivor picks and the few dollars i have built up on centsports.com i'm not betting these games, just tracking them and doing it on here so its a little more fun and others can chime in
hopefully nobody has been tailing me ...and im just tracking the games, im not putting any real money on the games (i did put some free plays on the games from youwager and betjamaica)
inev, no offense to them but i wouldnt call them the hottest cappers, just on a somewhat lucky streak of 10+ picks, but the #s are definitely proving my initial thought wrong..if i thought they were that good i would have just kept track of their record instead of keeping track of what fading them would produce =( (red face)
additional games (Already started so i won't count them in + - but i will count them in overall survivor picks
NBA Mil +4
NHL Pitt VS NY Islanders UNDER 5.5 (already 10 goals in 2 periods!)
0
hopefully nobody has been tailing me ...and im just tracking the games, im not putting any real money on the games (i did put some free plays on the games from youwager and betjamaica)
inev, no offense to them but i wouldnt call them the hottest cappers, just on a somewhat lucky streak of 10+ picks, but the #s are definitely proving my initial thought wrong..if i thought they were that good i would have just kept track of their record instead of keeping track of what fading them would produce =( (red face)
additional games (Already started so i won't count them in + - but i will count them in overall survivor picks
NBA Mil +4
NHL Pitt VS NY Islanders UNDER 5.5 (already 10 goals in 2 periods!)
2 games pending, 1-4 today so far,10-17 up to this point would be 9-13 if we don't count the NHL Over/under picks (1-4)
again at this point i am just tracking picks, my original theory was that the top rankings in survivor picks would have a greater chance of losing although i have only been doing this for 4 days , right now it would suggest that a blind fade or tail of these picks has no value.
i am going to continue to do this for at least 30 days to get some kind of long term trend
also , if i happen to have missed someones survivor pick that you notice,post it on here for me,,,usually weekdays i have no problem seeing them all...saturdays look like i may miss a few depending on how late they are picked,,,thanks everyone hope this thread can at least provide a little entertainment for you.
0
added play of ncaab ariz/ariz st OVER 135
2 games pending, 1-4 today so far,10-17 up to this point would be 9-13 if we don't count the NHL Over/under picks (1-4)
again at this point i am just tracking picks, my original theory was that the top rankings in survivor picks would have a greater chance of losing although i have only been doing this for 4 days , right now it would suggest that a blind fade or tail of these picks has no value.
i am going to continue to do this for at least 30 days to get some kind of long term trend
also , if i happen to have missed someones survivor pick that you notice,post it on here for me,,,usually weekdays i have no problem seeing them all...saturdays look like i may miss a few depending on how late they are picked,,,thanks everyone hope this thread can at least provide a little entertainment for you.
not entirely sure what you are trying to get at....as mentioned multiple times i am just tracking the fade picks...maybe its a dumb theory,no.... probably its a dumb theory, but i cant be the only one that has thought about fading/tailing survivor picks, so a little statistical info can only be helpful to everyone...
....and your other commment... since survivor is a free competition that would support my initial theory that fading the top players picks may have some value....ok so i lost $44 the 1st night and have just been tracking since...while $40 may be your entire welfare check ,its just 40 bucks to me...keep it comin though we need some humor in this thread or something to get other's attention
11-18 fading so far (10-14 if remove NHL bets which are weighted)
0
not entirely sure what you are trying to get at....as mentioned multiple times i am just tracking the fade picks...maybe its a dumb theory,no.... probably its a dumb theory, but i cant be the only one that has thought about fading/tailing survivor picks, so a little statistical info can only be helpful to everyone...
....and your other commment... since survivor is a free competition that would support my initial theory that fading the top players picks may have some value....ok so i lost $44 the 1st night and have just been tracking since...while $40 may be your entire welfare check ,its just 40 bucks to me...keep it comin though we need some humor in this thread or something to get other's attention
11-18 fading so far (10-14 if remove NHL bets which are weighted)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.