BUMP
First Attempt at an NBA Point Spread Model
47-28-1
sixers -0.2484
heat -11.1635
hawks -6.63
thunder -10.56
nets -1.189
mavs -15.81
jazz -0.33
nuggets -15.9
wolves -21.09
grizzlies -2.91
No link today I'm on mobile.
47-28-1
sixers -0.2484
heat -11.1635
hawks -6.63
thunder -10.56
nets -1.189
mavs -15.81
jazz -0.33
nuggets -15.9
wolves -21.09
grizzlies -2.91
No link today I'm on mobile.
52-35-1
Very little time to post lately. Keeping up with the tracking. Good luck
knicks -12.24
bucks -0.47
celtics -8.55
sixers -4.4
kings -9.69
pistons -1.86
nuggets -12.3
magic -5.6
lakers -7.13
suns -3.9
rockets-3.35
52-35-1
Very little time to post lately. Keeping up with the tracking. Good luck
knicks -12.24
bucks -0.47
celtics -8.55
sixers -4.4
kings -9.69
pistons -1.86
nuggets -12.3
magic -5.6
lakers -7.13
suns -3.9
rockets-3.35
77-52-1 magic -0.06cavs -5.2pacers -7.3suns -29.8jazz -1.53
Sheek, can you explain these numbers please. Cavs -5.2 does that mean your system shows them as a 5.2 point favorite? Or the spread is off by 5.2 points? Thanks
77-52-1 magic -0.06cavs -5.2pacers -7.3suns -29.8jazz -1.53
Sheek, can you explain these numbers please. Cavs -5.2 does that mean your system shows them as a 5.2 point favorite? Or the spread is off by 5.2 points? Thanks
@RCDirect
You have it correct. It's basically saying the Cavs should win by 5.2 pts if both teams perform to their exact seasonal averages. Should be taken as a guideline. As for the running record, I am basically tracking the record if I were to have bet the side that my system suggests against the Vegas spread. For the Cavs game, I have -5.2 so I would take Cavs +7.5 tonight.
@RCDirect
You have it correct. It's basically saying the Cavs should win by 5.2 pts if both teams perform to their exact seasonal averages. Should be taken as a guideline. As for the running record, I am basically tracking the record if I were to have bet the side that my system suggests against the Vegas spread. For the Cavs game, I have -5.2 so I would take Cavs +7.5 tonight.
80-54-1
Hornets -4.5
Magic +3.5*
Bucks +5.5
Cavs +2.5*
Raptors +2.5
Nets +3.5*
Rockets -5.5*
Sixers +8
Pelicans +1.5*
Clippers -7.5
Thunder -6.5*
Jazz -3.5
Suns -2.5*
Lakers +2.5*
80-54-1
Hornets -4.5
Magic +3.5*
Bucks +5.5
Cavs +2.5*
Raptors +2.5
Nets +3.5*
Rockets -5.5*
Sixers +8
Pelicans +1.5*
Clippers -7.5
Thunder -6.5*
Jazz -3.5
Suns -2.5*
Lakers +2.5*
@sheeklouch
80-54-1 Hornets -4.5 Magic +3.5* Bucks +5.5 Cavs +2.5* Raptors +2.5 Nets +3.5* Rockets -5.5* Sixers +8 Pelicans +1.5* Clippers -7.5 Thunder -6.5* Jazz -3.5 Suns -2.5* Lakers +2.5*
What are the asterisks for?
I figured out the win percentages of your model based on how many points off the model is vs the Vegas spread:
Between 1-4.99 points - .583%
Between 5-9.99 - .632%
Double digits - .563%
When the model has the other team favored vs the what the spread has - .682%
@sheeklouch
80-54-1 Hornets -4.5 Magic +3.5* Bucks +5.5 Cavs +2.5* Raptors +2.5 Nets +3.5* Rockets -5.5* Sixers +8 Pelicans +1.5* Clippers -7.5 Thunder -6.5* Jazz -3.5 Suns -2.5* Lakers +2.5*
What are the asterisks for?
I figured out the win percentages of your model based on how many points off the model is vs the Vegas spread:
Between 1-4.99 points - .583%
Between 5-9.99 - .632%
Double digits - .563%
When the model has the other team favored vs the what the spread has - .682%
@jacksup
No offense but I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about LOL.
As for the asterisks, those are games that I'm going to be watching closely and potentially betting myself.
@jacksup
No offense but I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about LOL.
As for the asterisks, those are games that I'm going to be watching closely and potentially betting myself.
@jacksup
Ohhhhh. I understand now. My fault. I thought you were trying to guess what the formula is in some way. That's my fault.
I stopped calculating the differential because I tweaked the formula a few times and I haven't fully committed to one or the other as of yet I've just been tracking both.
@jacksup
Ohhhhh. I understand now. My fault. I thought you were trying to guess what the formula is in some way. That's my fault.
I stopped calculating the differential because I tweaked the formula a few times and I haven't fully committed to one or the other as of yet I've just been tracking both.
Sheek, been following you a long time. Thank you.
any chance you can put numbers in the previous format?
I like the numbers that you used previously to today.
thank you
Sheek, been following you a long time. Thank you.
any chance you can put numbers in the previous format?
I like the numbers that you used previously to today.
thank you
@Swavings
Yes I can. One sec. I was trying to make it easier for people lol.
hornets -7.3
Magic -11.6
bucks -12.5
cavs -2.2
pacers -5.9
hawks -0.24
rockets -8.1
sixers -0.5
pelicans -5.7
clippers -16.6
thunder -22.3
jazz -16.8
suns -8.5
lakers -17.0
@Swavings
Yes I can. One sec. I was trying to make it easier for people lol.
hornets -7.3
Magic -11.6
bucks -12.5
cavs -2.2
pacers -5.9
hawks -0.24
rockets -8.1
sixers -0.5
pelicans -5.7
clippers -16.6
thunder -22.3
jazz -16.8
suns -8.5
lakers -17.0
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
