*I'll be making picks but using GianFranco's system. This is his martingale system but my own picks*
The way it works:
1. Bet 1 unit on 1H totals over
IF it hits = win
IF it loses = bet 2 units on 2H totals over
This system has hit 82% over 195 games entering into the 17-18 season. Mostly want to start around December after teams have had a couple months to warm up so tail with caution.
Link to tracked spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uCQsb9zRCoFoztD0j763C0UC7JuPIgTwuaBRJ6Mdn0U/edit#gid=375674508
10/14
MIN vs TOR 1h o115
NYK vs MIA 1h o113.5
BKN vs CLE 1h o111
DAL vs ATL 1h o120.5
more plays to come BOL
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
*I'll be making picks but using GianFranco's system. This is his martingale system but my own picks*
The way it works:
1. Bet 1 unit on 1H totals over
IF it hits = win
IF it loses = bet 2 units on 2H totals over
This system has hit 82% over 195 games entering into the 17-18 season. Mostly want to start around December after teams have had a couple months to warm up so tail with caution.
Link to tracked spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uCQsb9zRCoFoztD0j763C0UC7JuPIgTwuaBRJ6Mdn0U/edit#gid=375674508
That is where making the right picks come into the play.
If both halves go under than you lose 3 units. From previous years experience doing this, the 1h overs is 50% where as the 2h overs is closer to 70-80%
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheSquare:
And if BOTH halves stay under??
That is where making the right picks come into the play.
If both halves go under than you lose 3 units. From previous years experience doing this, the 1h overs is 50% where as the 2h overs is closer to 70-80%
i don't know where the hell you found stats that 2h are over 70-80% of the time. If anything the 2h is more under than over. And if overtime didn't count towards the 2h,,, under 2h would be way ahead
0
i don't know where the hell you found stats that 2h are over 70-80% of the time. If anything the 2h is more under than over. And if overtime didn't count towards the 2h,,, under 2h would be way ahead
i don't know where the hell you found stats that 2h are over 70-80% of the time. If anything the 2h is more under than over. And if overtime didn't count towards the 2h,,, under 2h would be way ahead
I didn't say every single game on the board would go over 80% of the time, only select plays.
Go look at the google docs and you will see a 117-22 WL record for 2h over plays
0
Quote Originally Posted by JoeyIce:
i don't know where the hell you found stats that 2h are over 70-80% of the time. If anything the 2h is more under than over. And if overtime didn't count towards the 2h,,, under 2h would be way ahead
I didn't say every single game on the board would go over 80% of the time, only select plays.
Go look at the google docs and you will see a 117-22 WL record for 2h over plays
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.