I wouldn’t count on it especially given how the wizards play on defense which favors the bucks. Bucks are great at scoring and shooting beyond the arc. These are the games that the bucks are still able to bully their opponents. Kris Middleton is an underrated scorer and Bledsoe is a bully when matching up against smaller guards. Brook is also able to stretch out the floor. Bucks have a very good bench too. 11.5 is still a big line.. but bucks at home I expect them to win by 7 at least.
I wouldn’t count on it especially given how the wizards play on defense which favors the bucks. Bucks are great at scoring and shooting beyond the arc. These are the games that the bucks are still able to bully their opponents. Kris Middleton is an underrated scorer and Bledsoe is a bully when matching up against smaller guards. Brook is also able to stretch out the floor. Bucks have a very good bench too. 11.5 is still a big line.. but bucks at home I expect them to win by 7 at least.
Will this be a repeat of last night's game with the Rocktes @ the Jazz? Where there was a public over reaction, Jazz line moves up from 12 to -14, Jazz lose SU. A forum member by Treyinventor brought an interesting theory up. Called the "EWING THEORY" Simply put:
Popularized by Bill Simmons in the early 2000s, the Ewing Theory is quite simple. It occurs whenever a team inexplicably gets better after the departure of their star player, whether through injury, trade, retirement or other circumstances. Prime examples include the Knicks getting to the 1999 NBA Finals after Patrick Ewing’s titular injury, the Nationals winning an NL title after the departure of Bryce Harper, and the Patriots winning three Super Bowls in four years after Drew Bledsoe’s injury.
Will his come into effect again tonight? Giannis out, public slams Wizards, line drops to single digits and the Bucks still cover the original 16.. I'm going to wait before tip off to possibly bet on the Bucks at a severely reduced spread..
Will this be a repeat of last night's game with the Rocktes @ the Jazz? Where there was a public over reaction, Jazz line moves up from 12 to -14, Jazz lose SU. A forum member by Treyinventor brought an interesting theory up. Called the "EWING THEORY" Simply put:
Popularized by Bill Simmons in the early 2000s, the Ewing Theory is quite simple. It occurs whenever a team inexplicably gets better after the departure of their star player, whether through injury, trade, retirement or other circumstances. Prime examples include the Knicks getting to the 1999 NBA Finals after Patrick Ewing’s titular injury, the Nationals winning an NL title after the departure of Bryce Harper, and the Patriots winning three Super Bowls in four years after Drew Bledsoe’s injury.
Will his come into effect again tonight? Giannis out, public slams Wizards, line drops to single digits and the Bucks still cover the original 16.. I'm going to wait before tip off to possibly bet on the Bucks at a severely reduced spread..
This
A true "OG" covers angle here...a good example of something one can learn on this site (yes they're still a few things around here that can be beneficial).
This
A true "OG" covers angle here...a good example of something one can learn on this site (yes they're still a few things around here that can be beneficial).
Specifically, in the NBA it's the "star player is out" angle. The Mavs the first game without Luca earlier this season when they beat the Bucks on the road (most recent example I can think of off the top of my head).
Specifically, in the NBA it's the "star player is out" angle. The Mavs the first game without Luca earlier this season when they beat the Bucks on the road (most recent example I can think of off the top of my head).
My friend and I actually follow this Theory. Majority of the time, teammates steps up when a star player is listed as DNP to prove they can win without "him". Just some hindsight
Since we're on this topic, I like betting against the team when a star player comes back first game as well. This has hit for me many times, a good example is the Lakers vs Celtics game with ADs return.
My friend and I actually follow this Theory. Majority of the time, teammates steps up when a star player is listed as DNP to prove they can win without "him". Just some hindsight
Since we're on this topic, I like betting against the team when a star player comes back first game as well. This has hit for me many times, a good example is the Lakers vs Celtics game with ADs return.
The question now is: How low will this line go? As of now, it's at 11.5 and I'm thinking that it can go as low as 10 come 7 o clock when Joe/Jane gets off of work and goes to make/place their bets before the games start.
The question now is: How low will this line go? As of now, it's at 11.5 and I'm thinking that it can go as low as 10 come 7 o clock when Joe/Jane gets off of work and goes to make/place their bets before the games start.
Yep...this definitely does not fall into the parameters
Yep...this definitely does not fall into the parameters
Good info and theory--what does titular mean?
Good info and theory--what does titular mean?
My friend, not to come off as rude but in this day and age, if you don't know/understand something, internet search it. I didn't know what it was too but I looked it up and found it. Just a quick, copy, paste, search and click... Keep searching different web pages if one doesn't explain it well.
My friend, not to come off as rude but in this day and age, if you don't know/understand something, internet search it. I didn't know what it was too but I looked it up and found it. Just a quick, copy, paste, search and click... Keep searching different web pages if one doesn't explain it well.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.