All Forums | NBA Betting

Goldust's golden NBA/NCAAB plays 2011-2012

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 180995
Posts: 939
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #401
7-7, -3.95 units today

YTD: 89-65, +45.90 units
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #402
Packers -7 -120 (12.5x)

I said all week I would be going large on the Packers. Buying the hook here just incase, but I think this game will be a blowout. After batting the Packers to a close game and looking great last week against the Falcons, linesmakers knew the public would gobble up a line of +8 for the Giants. About 65% on them. Packers are just the better team and Rodgers will punish the Giants secondary tomorrow. They are healthy off the bye week and will come out firing due to the tragedy their OC is going through. This game won't be close.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 9563
Posted: #403

sounds logical

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #404
Nuggets +10.5 (2x)

Suns +8.5 (2x)

NCAA:
Clemson +6.5 (2x)

Bradley +10 (2x)

Cleveland State PK (2x)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 13
Posted: #405
Were you getting Nuggets +10.5..I want some of that action..You mean Nuggetts -10.5..Right?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #406
No I bought 21 points. Lock it up!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #407
Packers back up to -9 at Pinny
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 55
Posted: #408
Quote Originally Posted by Goldusttt:

No I bought 21 points. Lock it up!!


then must be something like risking 100 for 1.  genious.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 475
Posted: #409
Packers -7.5 laying -108 at Pinny
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 6472
Posted: #410
Quote Originally Posted by Goldusttt:

No I bought 21 points. Lock it up!!
lmao
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 55
Posted: #411
packers looks bad at HT , down by 10
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #412
Was a bad call by me. I apologize to those that tailed. More often than not I hit these big plays. I won't change my style, it has always worked.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1400
Posted: #413
I think you are back to normal.  Anyway thank you for your early hot picks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 55
Posted: #414
I tailed you on packers but not for 12.5 units, only a small 2 units
but i was hurt badly on denver , a 5 units bet for me, too bad i dont bought 21 points like u

everyone has his bad day, bounce it back tmrw
appreciate if u give some reason of ur picks later.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 72
Posted: #415
I parlayed the giants and ravens for 1,000 in winnings...Im getting torched in the NBA, but due to the NFL, Im back in the game babbbyyy
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18254
Posted: #416

Hey tout McGee.....please start a new thread every day like the rest of us and stop calling attention to yourself.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #417
Knicks +2 (2x)

Grizz +2.5 (2x)


What does having a season long thread have to do with being a tout compared to a daily thread? More stupidity at Covers. Season long threads are common on other forums. I am tracking my results over the season, am I not? I don't feel the need to clutter the forum with threads every single day.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18254
Posted: #418
Not common here....90% of the time it's a tout. They come in like clock work every NBA season. You just joined in Dec as well
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #419
I don't really care what's common here. Yes, I am clearly a tout because I keep a season long thread. I clearly do such a good job of advertising myself, because this whole time I've only posted in my own thread and not in any others
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 143
Posted: #420

I agree with you Gold! There is nothing wrong with one thread. As you can see I have been a member for awhile but usually do not post on here unless I find the need to say something like now. I just come in to read the thread of cappers I feel that know what they are doing and give insight to what I am picking.

Everytime I come in the forums I see rediculous thread titles that just clutter up these forums.

I enjoy coming in to your thread to see your picks. Good job!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #421
Quote Originally Posted by money69:

I agree with you Gold! There is nothing wrong with one thread. As you can see I have been a member for awhile but usually do not post on here unless I find the need to say something like now. I just come in to read the thread of cappers I feel that know what they are doing and give insight to what I am picking.

Everytime I come in the forums I see rediculous thread titles that just clutter up these forums.

I enjoy coming in to your thread to see your picks. Good job!




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4418
Posted: #422

Nothing's wrong w/ one thread.  It does make it slightly harder to find your picks if a bunch of comments were made afterward though.  If you put your picks on a new thread they'd all be on p1.  But that's nitpicking. 

If you want to keep one thread, more power to you...

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 18254
Posted: #423
 more tout like behavior, with a SAF posting who hasn't posted in year supporting him.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #424
Bucks +9 (2x)

Bucks ML +390 (1x)

Wizards +5 (2x)

Dogs will bark on MLK day
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 530
Posted: #425
Quote Originally Posted by powerade:

 more tout like behavior, with a SAF posting who hasn't posted in year supporting him.


Have a mod check our IP addresses. Go ahead, I dare you. And then let me know how that goes. Are there even any mods in this dump? Anyway, I'm done with you.
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.