All Forums | NBA Betting

Hawks-Magic winner most likely beats The Bulls - write that down

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3502
Posts: 61
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2442
Posted: #51
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #52
bumped for the fools to see their foolish chicago predictors
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #53
congrats to bulls backers! they are much better defensively than i thought they were! 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5227
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

congrats to bulls backers! they are much better defensively than i thought they were! 

Thank you.  They are finally start to play defense like they did in the regular season, and Boozer and the rest of the bigs are finally playing well.  Gonna be a helluva series Vs the Heat.  I guarantee Miami won't get all those points in the paint and at the rim like they did vs the smaller and older Celtics.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2470
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

congrats to bulls backers! they are much better defensively than i thought they were! 



COP OUT

wow you practically went from predicting the hawks would win the series to feeling like you were correct since the bulls didnt win within 5 games....thats talent.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1564
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

all of you who are doubting me, have you been watching the pacers-bulls series?  turn rose into a jumpshooter and he is nothing, the pacers were 37-45, the worst team in the playoffs this yr, they have an interim HC, but they still have taken every gm in the series down to the wire,

question: will those of you are doubting me, come back into this thread after the magic or hawk beat the bulls, and tell me "nice pick man, i was wrong and you were right" ??
"nice pick man, i was wrong and you were right"
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 18451
Posted: #57

Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:

the Magic don't look that impressive right now but that's because of the matchup problems vs the Hawks.  maybe van gundy can figure something out.  either way, the winner of this series will most likely beat the Bulls.  i actually like the Hawks chances to beat the Bulls even better than the Magic's, but both of those teams have a better than 50% chance, even without home court advantage, to beat the bulls

write it down and remember me when it happens 

 i give props for sticking your neck out there, i think if orlando had beaten the hawks they could of beat the bulls.orlando, lets not forget got to a finals a couple years ago against hte lakers and got to the easter conf finals i believe last year and lost to boston.. Orlando just looked mindfucked out there in their whole series against the hawks, it was strange to see..

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #58
Quote Originally Posted by The_Ace:




COP OUT

wow you practically went from predicting the hawks would win the series to feeling like you were correct since the bulls didnt win within 5 games....thats talent.


people who thought the bulls would beat atl in 4 or 5 = foolish

people who thought the bulls would win the series in 6+ = smart

see the difference?  (rhetorical question)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 3317
Posted: #59
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:



people who thought the bulls would beat atl in 4 or 5 = foolish

people who thought the bulls would win the series in 6+ = smart

see the difference?  (rhetorical question)


people who thought the hawks would beat chicago = foolish
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 5296
Posted: #60
Quote Originally Posted by Fairweatherfan:



people who thought the hawks would beat chicago = foolish


the bulls were a huge fave to win the series, it took some balls to pick the hawks 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 3317
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:



the bulls were a huge fave to win the series, it took some balls to pick the hawks 


Yes it did, and the people with the balls lost money.  You get no bonus points for being wrong.  The people with Bulls in 5 were off by 1 game, you were off by two, don't think they're the idiots and you're the genius.  They were wrong, you were wrong.  That's it.
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.