Last game of first day was 118-108, over. The first game the following day was 213 total. Pretty sure that was an over.
Scout ignore the haters man it's the internet. These people act like you put a gun to their head when they lose. Irresponsible degenerates that expect people to go 100% & don't post their own plays and just girl when they follow others & lose. I mean people couldn't even understand what you were trying to explain & it was pretty fricken simple. GL today
0
Last game of first day was 118-108, over. The first game the following day was 213 total. Pretty sure that was an over.
Scout ignore the haters man it's the internet. These people act like you put a gun to their head when they lose. Irresponsible degenerates that expect people to go 100% & don't post their own plays and just girl when they follow others & lose. I mean people couldn't even understand what you were trying to explain & it was pretty fricken simple. GL today
Oh wait Portland/Memphis went OVER so the trend here is to bet OVER for boston. I was infact on the Under in the last boston game but it took a miracle for it to hit. So that's why I wouldnt touch it again.
Well, according to this "trend" the last game last night was Portland vs. Memphis that ended OVER 189 points i.e. OVER the line, without any overtime.
So technically that means that Cleveland (and LeBron James) and Boston should score OVER the line of 203 points?
Yes, the 203 line makes probably lots of bettors to feel like this is an UNDER game but it makes sense ... I think there is a fair chance 3 games would go OVER and CLE-BOS would be one of them ... the only UNDER I see for tonight is the high 220 line for Houston and Dallas.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LIanafranks5:
Oh wait Portland/Memphis went OVER so the trend here is to bet OVER for boston. I was infact on the Under in the last boston game but it took a miracle for it to hit. So that's why I wouldnt touch it again.
Well, according to this "trend" the last game last night was Portland vs. Memphis that ended OVER 189 points i.e. OVER the line, without any overtime.
So technically that means that Cleveland (and LeBron James) and Boston should score OVER the line of 203 points?
Yes, the 203 line makes probably lots of bettors to feel like this is an UNDER game but it makes sense ... I think there is a fair chance 3 games would go OVER and CLE-BOS would be one of them ... the only UNDER I see for tonight is the high 220 line for Houston and Dallas.
Well, according to this "trend" the last game last night was Portland
vs. Memphis that ended OVER 189 points i.e. OVER the line, without any
overtime.
So technically that means that Cleveland (and LeBron James) and Boston should score OVER the line of 203 points?
Yes,
the 203 line makes probably lots of bettors to feel like this is an
UNDER game but it makes sense ... I think there is a fair chance 3 games
would go OVER and CLE-BOS would be one of them ... the only UNDER I see
for tonight is the high 220 line for Houston and Dallas.
0
Didn't want to reply as a "Quote":
Well, according to this "trend" the last game last night was Portland
vs. Memphis that ended OVER 189 points i.e. OVER the line, without any
overtime.
So technically that means that Cleveland (and LeBron James) and Boston should score OVER the line of 203 points?
Yes,
the 203 line makes probably lots of bettors to feel like this is an
UNDER game but it makes sense ... I think there is a fair chance 3 games
would go OVER and CLE-BOS would be one of them ... the only UNDER I see
for tonight is the high 220 line for Houston and Dallas.
We keep our mouth shut now as much as possible, because those who bash first before thinking we cant learn from them, but they sure will learn a lot if we keep on explaining them spoon feeding them on how this works.
These guys i am sure forgot or never encountered a math problem in their lives, or worst had not solved any.
Dont teach them if they didnt understand the value of Some information! They won't get it.
0
Thanks to those who can comprehend.
We keep our mouth shut now as much as possible, because those who bash first before thinking we cant learn from them, but they sure will learn a lot if we keep on explaining them spoon feeding them on how this works.
These guys i am sure forgot or never encountered a math problem in their lives, or worst had not solved any.
Dont teach them if they didnt understand the value of Some information! They won't get it.
Ok, first about the idea of this trend being silly: how many times you tried unsilly, logical trends in betting and you failed? as long as a silly/or not silly trend makes you money, then that is all you count for and this works 100% maybe it is pure luck who knows but if sth works 100%, then you hesitate to say uu mayb i should try
also, opening line over for boston is 203.5 and line keeps dropping why? any injury news?
0
Ok, first about the idea of this trend being silly: how many times you tried unsilly, logical trends in betting and you failed? as long as a silly/or not silly trend makes you money, then that is all you count for and this works 100% maybe it is pure luck who knows but if sth works 100%, then you hesitate to say uu mayb i should try
also, opening line over for boston is 203.5 and line keeps dropping why? any injury news?
Everything comes in patterns and streaks. Scout found a good streak here and it has not lost yet. Now that doesn't mean it won't lose tomorrow. It is probably due to lose now. Boston/cleveland under, I wouldn't touch it personally.
There you go, in the long run everything regresses to the mean. Just like faves and underdogs win at a 50/50 rate given a large enough sample size.
It's idiotic to think that a 'trend' has any influence on a game. How exactly does some random game from yesterday have any effect on a future outcome of an unrelated contest? It doesn't, every game has exactly a 50% chance of going one way or the other.
That being said, there are some situations that play out contrary to this - for example a home team with a good winning percentage that is down 8+ points at the half covers the 2nd half at a higher then average rate. This is not a trend, but more of a statistical anomaly that plays over a large sample size.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LIanafranks5:
Everything comes in patterns and streaks. Scout found a good streak here and it has not lost yet. Now that doesn't mean it won't lose tomorrow. It is probably due to lose now. Boston/cleveland under, I wouldn't touch it personally.
There you go, in the long run everything regresses to the mean. Just like faves and underdogs win at a 50/50 rate given a large enough sample size.
It's idiotic to think that a 'trend' has any influence on a game. How exactly does some random game from yesterday have any effect on a future outcome of an unrelated contest? It doesn't, every game has exactly a 50% chance of going one way or the other.
That being said, there are some situations that play out contrary to this - for example a home team with a good winning percentage that is down 8+ points at the half covers the 2nd half at a higher then average rate. This is not a trend, but more of a statistical anomaly that plays over a large sample size.
Just a little changes, there was a mistake the last time out, i should have played 630pm esr the last time, not the 1pm est, because thats where the perfect trend got made, playing approx. Time 7am or 8am.
Whoever had think of this before me pls pm me, i want you in my team.
I keep talking math i forgot the science. Lol
So if we stick to the night pkay this trend is still perfect. I hit the over yesterday.
Still perfect trend if i have seen the loopholes early on.
Whoever had think of this beforehand, if there is any, your good.
0
Still hitting
Just a little changes, there was a mistake the last time out, i should have played 630pm esr the last time, not the 1pm est, because thats where the perfect trend got made, playing approx. Time 7am or 8am.
Whoever had think of this before me pls pm me, i want you in my team.
I keep talking math i forgot the science. Lol
So if we stick to the night pkay this trend is still perfect. I hit the over yesterday.
Still perfect trend if i have seen the loopholes early on.
Whoever had think of this beforehand, if there is any, your good.
We played 1pm est the last time, and after that, i think its really a wrong move, i should have seen early on that the 630pm est should be the play, its make a lot of sense, as i preaching match, and analyzing science running in my head, i should have saw this.
But after the play lost, i was thinking that there could be some mistakes that i didnt see, and indeed, we could be better than that, if we had use our brain deep, this system is made because of almost the same time pattern, so playing the early 1pm est is not a good choice, yeap i hope i seen this before i posted.
But i keep on learning and add this up to the files for future resources.
Yesterday nets atl over.
today mavs game under.
Still a perfect 9 0 trend if we just been more logical and seen the loopholes.
i didnt see it either early, but i seen it after i lost the last time.
then immediately saw it and play the trend yesterday and won, and will play it again today.
0
I mean aprrox. 7pm est or 8 pm est, 630 pm est.
We played 1pm est the last time, and after that, i think its really a wrong move, i should have seen early on that the 630pm est should be the play, its make a lot of sense, as i preaching match, and analyzing science running in my head, i should have saw this.
But after the play lost, i was thinking that there could be some mistakes that i didnt see, and indeed, we could be better than that, if we had use our brain deep, this system is made because of almost the same time pattern, so playing the early 1pm est is not a good choice, yeap i hope i seen this before i posted.
But i keep on learning and add this up to the files for future resources.
Yesterday nets atl over.
today mavs game under.
Still a perfect 9 0 trend if we just been more logical and seen the loopholes.
i didnt see it either early, but i seen it after i lost the last time.
then immediately saw it and play the trend yesterday and won, and will play it again today.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Thanks to those who can comprehend. 
Hot Forum Topics
