Uhh uhh sorry guys posting this i need help to understand my English is not good to understand.
Milwaukee Bucks +10 -105*vs Oklahoma City Thunder
Sacramento Kings +4 -105*vs Los Angeles Lakers
What mean especially these picks :
Will Milwauke Bucks score over 105 point ? Or Under 105 points.
And
Will Sacramento score over 105 points ?
Am i right,
Looking for explentaision ty.
It means he believes the Bucks will cover the spread. He doesn't think that the Bucks will lose by 10 or less. In order to win this bet the Bucks must lose by 9 or less or win the game outright (10 would be a push or a refunded wager)
He loses this bet if the Bucks lose by 11 or more.
Same with the Kings game but the number is 4 here not 10.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Sanderj93:
Uhh uhh sorry guys posting this i need help to understand my English is not good to understand.
Milwaukee Bucks +10 -105*vs Oklahoma City Thunder
Sacramento Kings +4 -105*vs Los Angeles Lakers
What mean especially these picks :
Will Milwauke Bucks score over 105 point ? Or Under 105 points.
And
Will Sacramento score over 105 points ?
Am i right,
Looking for explentaision ty.
It means he believes the Bucks will cover the spread. He doesn't think that the Bucks will lose by 10 or less. In order to win this bet the Bucks must lose by 9 or less or win the game outright (10 would be a push or a refunded wager)
He loses this bet if the Bucks lose by 11 or more.
Same with the Kings game but the number is 4 here not 10.
Without Cousins, Kings ATS of late was 2 covers out of 6 games. Sander~
The "105" has nothing to do with scoring; it's the odds for each bet.
The +10 line on the Kings means that if the Kings lose the game at 9 pts, or less, the +10 bet covers and you win the bet; if the Kings lose the game by over 10 pts, then you lose the bet.
If the Kings lose by exactly 10 pts, it's a push and you get your bet money back, but you won't make money, nor lose money.
Does this help?
0
With Cousins, Kings' ATS was around 65%.
Without Cousins, Kings ATS of late was 2 covers out of 6 games. Sander~
The "105" has nothing to do with scoring; it's the odds for each bet.
The +10 line on the Kings means that if the Kings lose the game at 9 pts, or less, the +10 bet covers and you win the bet; if the Kings lose the game by over 10 pts, then you lose the bet.
If the Kings lose by exactly 10 pts, it's a push and you get your bet money back, but you won't make money, nor lose money.
English is not my national language but i'll try to explain this to you.
In the USA you have negative and possitive bets. Negative means how much you have to bet to win 100$. Possitive means how much you could win if you bet 100$.
I'm guessing that you are from Europe and this could be tough for you.
Marks "+" and "-" mean possitive and negative.
0
English is not my national language but i'll try to explain this to you.
In the USA you have negative and possitive bets. Negative means how much you have to bet to win 100$. Possitive means how much you could win if you bet 100$.
I'm guessing that you are from Europe and this could be tough for you.
709 Milwaukee Bucks +10 -105*vs Oklahoma City Thunder
715 Sacramento Kings +4 -105*vs Los Angeles Lakers
Although the system likes both of these spots, monitoring the changes in all team's lineups would be wisdom - impacting my thoughts on wager amounts...
Bol to us all.
Happy Tuesday All...
I'm a fan of yours and I tail your picks everyday but this time I think I'm on the other side. Maybe you're right, line up changes and injuries are the factors. Cousins will be out(maybe up until January) and the Lakers is looking to end it 3-game losing streak at home. I'm leaning OKC as well, with Durant back on the line up, I don't think MIL will be able to catch up with the offensive power OKC has. Also it is the first time KD will play at home this season so the crowd expects a good game from him. Just my thoughts.
Anyway, BOL guys!
0
Quote Originally Posted by wwtpglobal:
Updated record: 7-0
2 system plays for tonight...
709 Milwaukee Bucks +10 -105*vs Oklahoma City Thunder
715 Sacramento Kings +4 -105*vs Los Angeles Lakers
Although the system likes both of these spots, monitoring the changes in all team's lineups would be wisdom - impacting my thoughts on wager amounts...
Bol to us all.
Happy Tuesday All...
I'm a fan of yours and I tail your picks everyday but this time I think I'm on the other side. Maybe you're right, line up changes and injuries are the factors. Cousins will be out(maybe up until January) and the Lakers is looking to end it 3-game losing streak at home. I'm leaning OKC as well, with Durant back on the line up, I don't think MIL will be able to catch up with the offensive power OKC has. Also it is the first time KD will play at home this season so the crowd expects a good game from him. Just my thoughts.
Yes, but it's safe to say that each of the Kings' games, sans Cousins, also took his absence into account in the spread, yet the Kings have failed to cover those adjusted spreads.
The Kings have failed to cover those adjusted spreads. That's my point.
0
Quote Originally Posted by longstah:
That's why the LAL -4
Yes, but it's safe to say that each of the Kings' games, sans Cousins, also took his absence into account in the spread, yet the Kings have failed to cover those adjusted spreads.
The Kings have failed to cover those adjusted spreads. That's my point.
Yes, but it's safe to say that each of the Kings' games, sans Cousins, also took his absence into account in the spread, yet the Kings have failed to cover those adjusted spreads.
The Kings have failed to cover those adjusted spreads. That's my point.
I'm on Sacramento +4 tonight teams do cover without there stars why did this line open at Lakers -1.5 and go up to -4 I know why!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mozart:
Yes, but it's safe to say that each of the Kings' games, sans Cousins, also took his absence into account in the spread, yet the Kings have failed to cover those adjusted spreads.
The Kings have failed to cover those adjusted spreads. That's my point.
I'm on Sacramento +4 tonight teams do cover without there stars why did this line open at Lakers -1.5 and go up to -4 I know why!!!
Once the system is run and I've got a play based on a minimum standard - There are 3 clear levels of plays that change as current lines move. I've located 23 total plays fitting the criteria. Here are the winning %'s of those plays since Oct 28.
Tier 1 (weakest) 66.7%
Tier 2 70.3%
Tier 3 85.7%
Hope this helps...
0
Quote Originally Posted by divisoria:
should I still give in ?
Once the system is run and I've got a play based on a minimum standard - There are 3 clear levels of plays that change as current lines move. I've located 23 total plays fitting the criteria. Here are the winning %'s of those plays since Oct 28.
Once the system is run and I've got a play based on a minimum standard - There are 3 clear levels of plays that change as current lines move. I've located 23 total plays fitting the criteria. Here are the winning %'s of those plays since Oct 28.
Tier 1 (weakest) 66.7%
Tier 2 70.3%
Tier 3 85.7%
Hope this helps...
What Tier do you have Sacramento and what tier do you have Milwaukee? Wanna make sure we are on the same page sent you a Direct Message
0
Quote Originally Posted by wwtpglobal:
Once the system is run and I've got a play based on a minimum standard - There are 3 clear levels of plays that change as current lines move. I've located 23 total plays fitting the criteria. Here are the winning %'s of those plays since Oct 28.
Tier 1 (weakest) 66.7%
Tier 2 70.3%
Tier 3 85.7%
Hope this helps...
What Tier do you have Sacramento and what tier do you have Milwaukee? Wanna make sure we are on the same page sent you a Direct Message
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
