All Forums | NBA Betting

JACKSON SHOT WAS GOOD....I SLOW PLAYED IT ON PVR

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5824
Posts: 80
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 31214
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing:

i watched it again like 10 times it was off his fingertips.  I always pay when i lose but i will not b payin my local for that bs shot was clearly good


But if they counted it, you would have expected your local to pay you. There is a code of honor even in gambling that you must respect or karma will come back and fuck you in the rear
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by TyDarius:

TOTALLY reminds me of the Steelers vs Chargers, when they took back a meaningless TD by Palamalu. Just as the 3 point shot was meaningless, what is the point to even review it and if so, why would you overturn it unless it was clearly no good. Just like alot of money was on the Steelers, I ber a lot of money was on the Spurs 2nd half, just something to think about
I lost on that too!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 41
Posted: #28
WTF!!!!!! My 2nd Half bet is no good. FUCK YOU VEGAS!!! & Marv. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 328
Posted: #29
Why review it when it was so close and you really couldn't get a good feel live if it was good or not???

And it was actually good....

MIND BOGGLING
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing:

.8 is plenty of time to catch an shoot

 

Catch and shoot yes....

Catch, dribble, turn and over head shot NO

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #31

Can ANYBODY explain why the Spurs would call a timeout down 5 with .8 left???

Hmmm.....

Just to shoot a 3....

How strange

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 14173
Posted: #32
refs called it off because the time keeper didnt start the clock on time...no way he gets that off with .8 left
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 328
Posted: #33
The shot clock was started in time....I watched every aspect of that final shot and everything was started on time and the ball was released on time....

IT WAS A GOOD BASKET
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 2915
Posted: #34
Was it just waved off or was it reviewed and then waved off?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16153
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by LawsonJames:



But if they counted it, you would have expected your local to pay you. There is a code of honor even in gambling that you must respect or karma will come back and fuck you in the rear

 

 

Lawson 100% agree and i stated in post iv neva had an issue with payin, but the shot was clearly good, reviewed it 20 times already and was off fingertips, There is no way u could not count that nevamind overturn it. But 100% agree with the code

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2012
Posts: 1954
Posted: #36

I had no Bet on the 2nd Half and I played it back and it Looked Good..

Just My Opinion though..

Sorry to those who were on the wrong end..

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by sullyconor:

The shot clock was started in time....I watched every aspect of that final shot and everything was started on time and the ball was released on time....

IT WAS A GOOD BASKET

 

You cant catch the ball moving away from the basket, turn and shoot in .8....

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16153
Posted: #38

Quote Originally Posted by daLOCKSMITH:

refs called it off because the time keeper didnt start the clock on time...no way he gets that off with .8 left

 

 

I dont get why people say u cant get a shot off in .8 sec, thats enuf time

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 8118
Posted: #39
It seemed like it took a LONNNNNNGGGGG time for them to start the clock once he touched the ball. Jacksons release alone takes .6 seconds!!! Not to mention he had to catch and square away.....PS I didn't even have any action on the game  just what I noticed when watching it. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 2915
Posted: #40
I had no wager, and weather it was good or not, My concern is why was it reviewed? Hard to believe if it was a 30 point blow out, they would have reviewed it. So why review it now?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 5908
Posted: #41
They didn't start the clock is what's making you think this
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 118
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

Can ANYBODY explain why the Spurs would call a timeout down 5 with .8 left???

Hmmm.....

Just to shoot a 3....

How strange



If you watch the replay which i did b/c i had the thunder +5, it's not the buzzer but the lights that determines the shot... the ball was still on his fingertips when the lights go off... just saying... TBS's clock was .1 secs slower that what was on the clock on the backboard... Just watched it again and the lights go off on the backboard when the ball was still on his fingertips...

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #43

HE WASNT EVEN FACING THE HOOP!!!!!!!!!!!

YOU CANT CATCH AND TURN AND SHOOT in .8 seconds....

And look how slow his shot was...

You guys are amazing

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 5196
Posted: #44
Damn wish I had requested an immediate payout before they could take the 2 units outta my account just brutal beat even though he shouldn't have had the opportunity in te first place
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 14746
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by sullyconor:

That shot was out of his hand right at the buzzer.....

It should have counted

How come I slowed played it on PVR and it showed he was too late...lol

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2297
Posted: #46
this was probably my worst loss in a loooong time. but im not too disappointed. it would seem fishy at first, but considering the circumstances, there was only .8 seconds remaining. sjax caught the ball and took a step back before releasing. the shot left his hand before the buzzer. but im assuming theyre saying the clock didnt start in time.

its murky situations like these where vegas steps in. because you can argue both ways it shouldve counted or it shouldnt have. public must have pounded the spurs 2nd half.

it is what it is....$10K swing.
instead if being up 6K i'm down 3K.

The game was lost when HArden hit that last 3.
Shoulda coulda woulda forced Thabo to be the hero instead.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 19693
Posted: #47
I'm still wondering about that last TO down 5 w/.8 to go.........what 5-point play do you diagram?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2297
Posted: #48
Also they know there would not be any backlash from the spurs or the nba because there is no differece between losing by 5 or losing by 2.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 31214
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing:

 

 

Lawson 100% agree and i stated in post iv neva had an issue with payin, but the shot was clearly good, reviewed it 20 times already and was off fingertips, There is no way u could not count that nevamind overturn it. But 100% agree with the code



Sounds good my friend 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 185
Posted: #50
YESSSS!!! That was the best second half win of my life, after I thought I lost, I come to the forums and you guys give me the great news. I love all of you!! HJGDJKIGYUETU!&*^*&^
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.