Utah's defense is barely there as it is...Hawks play faster at home and have been rolling along quite nicely lately. I expect them to get up to the 107-113 range.
Prediction: Hawks 109 Jazz 96
LOL, The refs allowing the Jazz to molest the Hawks on defense. The Jazz are one of the worst defensive teams but for some reason a hack is called a block in this game...The Jazz with 7 blocks in 1 qtr and a half....Guess the refs promised their families and friends under here....Also they called 2 fouls on Trey Burkes.....So easy to manipulate totals of you are a ref...Just ask Tim.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
Utah vs Atlanta OVER 198.5 ($110 to win $100)
Utah's defense is barely there as it is...Hawks play faster at home and have been rolling along quite nicely lately. I expect them to get up to the 107-113 range.
Prediction: Hawks 109 Jazz 96
LOL, The refs allowing the Jazz to molest the Hawks on defense. The Jazz are one of the worst defensive teams but for some reason a hack is called a block in this game...The Jazz with 7 blocks in 1 qtr and a half....Guess the refs promised their families and friends under here....Also they called 2 fouls on Trey Burkes.....So easy to manipulate totals of you are a ref...Just ask Tim.
Now tHE FTs are flowing...What was a block in the first half, is now a shooting foul in the 2nd...What changed? Refs had 1st half under? 2nd half over?
0
Now tHE FTs are flowing...What was a block in the first half, is now a shooting foul in the 2nd...What changed? Refs had 1st half under? 2nd half over?
Now tHE FTs are flowing...What was a block in the first half, is now a shooting foul in the 2nd...What changed? Refs had 1st half under? 2nd half over?
it proved that your theory is wrong
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
Now tHE FTs are flowing...What was a block in the first half, is now a shooting foul in the 2nd...What changed? Refs had 1st half under? 2nd half over?
Agree with damu4life here. The situation the Lakers were put in whem kobe came back was not conducive for a seamless transition. You lose all your pgs to injury and Kobe is forced to play the pg, a position he has never been asked to play. I think given the circumstances, he did a commendable job. If you think the fact he's out doesn't change a thing offensively. They still have a ton of one-on-one players who can't really distribute the ball. Defensively, they may improve BC they'll have younger and more athletic players on the court now.
As for the contract, I am a laker fan and a part of me wishes he took less money. But any sane and logical person would take the contract he got. This is going to be his last payday in the NBA and I don't blame him at all for taking it. He isn't a business man, a doctor, or anything else. He's a baller, and if I was only going to play for a couple more years, I'd do what I could to get paid, considering he really has no other life skills that can earn him tge money he makes playing ball. So I think you labelling him as selfish is not fair. Additionally, while he wasn't producing on the court what his contract value dictates, he was still playing well. Nash, on the other hand, is not playing, and when he does, is not productive. And he is not a marketable player right now. I'd be more upset at that contract if I were the laker front office than Kobe's.
Cm, respect that u put your thoughts and plays and back them up. I disagree with you a lot, but I do read your perspective to help narrow my bets down. So continue the good work.
I agree that the Nash contract was a pile of poop for sure...they assumed that teaming him up with D'Antoni was all they needed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kxb4777:
Agree with damu4life here. The situation the Lakers were put in whem kobe came back was not conducive for a seamless transition. You lose all your pgs to injury and Kobe is forced to play the pg, a position he has never been asked to play. I think given the circumstances, he did a commendable job. If you think the fact he's out doesn't change a thing offensively. They still have a ton of one-on-one players who can't really distribute the ball. Defensively, they may improve BC they'll have younger and more athletic players on the court now.
As for the contract, I am a laker fan and a part of me wishes he took less money. But any sane and logical person would take the contract he got. This is going to be his last payday in the NBA and I don't blame him at all for taking it. He isn't a business man, a doctor, or anything else. He's a baller, and if I was only going to play for a couple more years, I'd do what I could to get paid, considering he really has no other life skills that can earn him tge money he makes playing ball. So I think you labelling him as selfish is not fair. Additionally, while he wasn't producing on the court what his contract value dictates, he was still playing well. Nash, on the other hand, is not playing, and when he does, is not productive. And he is not a marketable player right now. I'd be more upset at that contract if I were the laker front office than Kobe's.
Cm, respect that u put your thoughts and plays and back them up. I disagree with you a lot, but I do read your perspective to help narrow my bets down. So continue the good work.
I agree that the Nash contract was a pile of poop for sure...they assumed that teaming him up with D'Antoni was all they needed.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.