Record vs. Spread: 30-31 (-0.1u) Record vs. O/U: 37-24 (+22.6u) Record vs. Parlay: 0-1 (-1u) ==================================================================
0-3 last night...rough games all over the place. Still a great win for the Celtics in 2OT. Back to the board tonight.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
OVERALL RECORD: 67-56 (21.5u)
Record vs. Spread: 30-31 (-0.1u) Record vs. O/U: 37-24 (+22.6u) Record vs. Parlay: 0-1 (-1u) ==================================================================
0-3 last night...rough games all over the place. Still a great win for the Celtics in 2OT. Back to the board tonight.
I know I said I'm staying away from the Lakers' spread for a while, but this one is a little too juicy for me. I'm not positive that the Lakers win this game and get off the slide, but I do believe that they will keep it close the entire way through. Kobe usually has special games in MSG...as does Dwight Howard. Knicks escaped a tough battle against the Nets the other night...and it should be that type of game once again. Also riding the trend of home teams doing terribly on Thursday nights.
Prediction: Knicks 107 Lakers 104
0
LA Lakers +6.5 (2.2 to win 2)
I know I said I'm staying away from the Lakers' spread for a while, but this one is a little too juicy for me. I'm not positive that the Lakers win this game and get off the slide, but I do believe that they will keep it close the entire way through. Kobe usually has special games in MSG...as does Dwight Howard. Knicks escaped a tough battle against the Nets the other night...and it should be that type of game once again. Also riding the trend of home teams doing terribly on Thursday nights.
Say you flip a coin 10 times each day, on average you can expect to get at least a day, where you have 7-3 or 8-2 or 9-1 head (chance for that is 17%). Say that day is Thursday.
Now you conclusion is you are more likely to flip heads on Thursday?
Dude, these kind of trends are RANDOM, you have no sample size of any significance, it's what the toot do to sound smart, but they really aren't.
0
Haha, what trend? It's absolutely random you nut.
Say you flip a coin 10 times each day, on average you can expect to get at least a day, where you have 7-3 or 8-2 or 9-1 head (chance for that is 17%). Say that day is Thursday.
Now you conclusion is you are more likely to flip heads on Thursday?
Dude, these kind of trends are RANDOM, you have no sample size of any significance, it's what the toot do to sound smart, but they really aren't.
Unless Lakers start playing defense, they will continue losing. They are so disgustingly disorganized. They and Heat have been to me because I just can't tell if they will show up and play right!
0
Unless Lakers start playing defense, they will continue losing. They are so disgustingly disorganized. They and Heat have been to me because I just can't tell if they will show up and play right!
TNT Thursday warrants stronger consideration when evaluating daily trends. Additionally, ignoring trends is like ignoring referee schedules; if you don't know, you won't care. BOL CMJ
0
TNT Thursday warrants stronger consideration when evaluating daily trends. Additionally, ignoring trends is like ignoring referee schedules; if you don't know, you won't care. BOL CMJ
Say you flip a coin 10 times each day, on average you can expect to get at least a day, where you have 7-3 or 8-2 or 9-1 head (chance for that is 17%). Say that day is Thursday.
Now you conclusion is you are more likely to flip heads on Thursday?
Dude, these kind of trends are RANDOM, you have no sample size of any significance, it's what the toot do to sound smart, but they really aren't.
Wrong. Home teams playing on thursday doing bad could be random, but that's not a for sure. You don't think theres a player or two on each team that won't be looking ahead to their weekend, plans with the boys, wife, vacation maybe?
Every person is different.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fiire:
Haha, what trend? It's absolutely random you nut.
Say you flip a coin 10 times each day, on average you can expect to get at least a day, where you have 7-3 or 8-2 or 9-1 head (chance for that is 17%). Say that day is Thursday.
Now you conclusion is you are more likely to flip heads on Thursday?
Dude, these kind of trends are RANDOM, you have no sample size of any significance, it's what the toot do to sound smart, but they really aren't.
Wrong. Home teams playing on thursday doing bad could be random, but that's not a for sure. You don't think theres a player or two on each team that won't be looking ahead to their weekend, plans with the boys, wife, vacation maybe?
Say you flip a coin 10 times each day, on average you can expect to get at least a day, where you have 7-3 or 8-2 or 9-1 head (chance for that is 17%). Say that day is Thursday.
Now you conclusion is you are more likely to flip heads on Thursday?
Dude, these kind of trends are RANDOM, you have no sample size of any significance, it's what the toot do to sound smart, but they really aren't.
There is very little about sports that is RANDOM. Based on your theory...every trend in sports is useless because they are all random? If you truly believe that, then I feel bad for you, and enjoy capping at 50% because it's just a coin flip
0
Quote Originally Posted by fiire:
Haha, what trend? It's absolutely random you nut.
Say you flip a coin 10 times each day, on average you can expect to get at least a day, where you have 7-3 or 8-2 or 9-1 head (chance for that is 17%). Say that day is Thursday.
Now you conclusion is you are more likely to flip heads on Thursday?
Dude, these kind of trends are RANDOM, you have no sample size of any significance, it's what the toot do to sound smart, but they really aren't.
There is very little about sports that is RANDOM. Based on your theory...every trend in sports is useless because they are all random? If you truly believe that, then I feel bad for you, and enjoy capping at 50% because it's just a coin flip
Wrong. Home teams playing on thursday doing bad could be random, but that's not a for sure. You don't think theres a player or two on each team that won't be looking ahead to their weekend, plans with the boys, wife, vacation maybe?
Every person is different.
My thinking is that generally the Thursday games are higher profile games...and there is a lot more pressure on the home team knowing that they have a quality opponent or rival team coming into town and the cameras are on them.
Same with last season in the playoffs...home teams might win the games, but they don't cover that well
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:
Wrong. Home teams playing on thursday doing bad could be random, but that's not a for sure. You don't think theres a player or two on each team that won't be looking ahead to their weekend, plans with the boys, wife, vacation maybe?
Every person is different.
My thinking is that generally the Thursday games are higher profile games...and there is a lot more pressure on the home team knowing that they have a quality opponent or rival team coming into town and the cameras are on them.
Same with last season in the playoffs...home teams might win the games, but they don't cover that well
My thinking is that generally the Thursday games are higher profile games...and there is a lot more pressure on the home team knowing that they have a quality opponent or rival team coming into town and the cameras are on them.
Same with last season in the playoffs...home teams might win the games, but they don't cover that well
True, but you have to remember, this isn't the Knicks of old, totally different team.. I say 16 thees go down tonight..I leaned Lakers at first, but couldnt do it. GL..
0
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
My thinking is that generally the Thursday games are higher profile games...and there is a lot more pressure on the home team knowing that they have a quality opponent or rival team coming into town and the cameras are on them.
Same with last season in the playoffs...home teams might win the games, but they don't cover that well
True, but you have to remember, this isn't the Knicks of old, totally different team.. I say 16 thees go down tonight..I leaned Lakers at first, but couldnt do it. GL..
I know I said I'm staying away from the Lakers' spread for a while, but this one is a little too juicy for me. I'm not positive that the Lakers win this game and get off the slide, but I do believe that they will keep it close the entire way through. Kobe usually has special games in MSG...as does Dwight Howard. Knicks escaped a tough battle against the Nets the other night...and it should be that type of game once again. Also riding the trend of home teams doing terribly on Thursday nights.
Prediction: Knicks 107 Lakers 104
Spread looks either way to me, but that is one way to keep a short losing streak running longer > bet on a team with multiple problems.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
LA Lakers +6.5 (2.2 to win 2)
I know I said I'm staying away from the Lakers' spread for a while, but this one is a little too juicy for me. I'm not positive that the Lakers win this game and get off the slide, but I do believe that they will keep it close the entire way through. Kobe usually has special games in MSG...as does Dwight Howard. Knicks escaped a tough battle against the Nets the other night...and it should be that type of game once again. Also riding the trend of home teams doing terribly on Thursday nights.
Prediction: Knicks 107 Lakers 104
Spread looks either way to me, but that is one way to keep a short losing streak running longer > bet on a team with multiple problems.
Hard to bet on a Lakers defense that is non-existent. They have one of the best defensive players and they cant get a stop. If I heard correct the Cavs had something like 12 layups in a row the other night against them. Do you think their D got any better in a couple nights? The Knicks have proved they can shoot the lights out of the ball and have depth. I cannot see this being very close especially if the Knicks hit their 3s. I definitely like the over in this game but wouldnt burn my money on a Laker team that has yet to show any toughness or energy on the court. My opinion. BOL
“You don’t get what you hope for, you get what you work for!”
0
Hard to bet on a Lakers defense that is non-existent. They have one of the best defensive players and they cant get a stop. If I heard correct the Cavs had something like 12 layups in a row the other night against them. Do you think their D got any better in a couple nights? The Knicks have proved they can shoot the lights out of the ball and have depth. I cannot see this being very close especially if the Knicks hit their 3s. I definitely like the over in this game but wouldnt burn my money on a Laker team that has yet to show any toughness or energy on the court. My opinion. BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.