LaVine is already the best dunker in the history. Him or no-bet

Are you drunk or do you not have any clue about dunking? Bartons first dunk wasnt even a clean dunk. 

LaVines first 2 were  better than Gordons first 2, Gordons mascots dunks were better than LaVine in those respective rounds, but in those rounds i wouldnt give LaVine under 50 points. 

You have no clue how difficult it is to do what LaVine did, its just that hes that good he makes it look simple, but no1 can copy what LaVine did - which is why they aint standing in the Slam Dunk Contest and which is why they aint winning the slam dunk contest back to back. 

Gordon used a mascot on his 2nd dunk.  so he had the better dunks when using a mascot but lavine had the better first 2 dunks.  okay then

Why would i be "sweating"? Can you tell me why? Because Gordon showed up but LaVine responded? 

i took drummond +1200 like for 5 bucks, you fackin moron.

levine was like -160 and levine not to win wasn't offered so stop trollin bec you had the right pick. it was fix and levine shouldn't have won!!! 

just the response expected from a fu.kking meat-head who had the panthers winning by 28 points..you are truly clueless...it was a toss of a coin and many,many good credible judges wud have given it to gordon you fu.kking dunce....THATS why you wud have been sweating after laying ridiculous juice...but your stupidity and inability to learn will allow this to just wash over you and you'll be back with a thread next week saying how warriors will never lose another game this year cos they are "so awesome" and "the best team ever,man!!!!".

actually the best price for lavine was around -250 and much worse at many books....-160 wud have had me interested....seemed a bit fairer in a 4 horse race

Bet on a guy without bounce again next year please. 

And when ZECK LEVINE wins again lemme know. 

You clearly dont know anything. Ehh, how can they give it to Gordon? Tell me? Its not like they pick either LaVine or Gordon as the winner, they rate the dunks from 1-10 you fking imbecile. LaVine was awarded 50 points IN ALL OF HIS ATTEMPTS except for the 2nd one so therefore hes clearly and evidently the winner. Are you really that stupid? All of LaVines dunks were worth 50 points, many of Gordons were worth 50 points as well but not his last one so therefore LaVine pulled out as the correct winner. Giving LaVine under 50 on any of his attempts would be blasphemous. Are you too stupid to comprehend this? 

But Lavine is not the best dunker in history. 

Jason Richardson is with Vince a close second. Lavine would come in 3rd/4th/5th even after Gerald Green/Jordan/Wilkins.

hmmm,interesting choice scalabrine...richardson was nice and i have still yet to see another player throw the ball off the backboard,catch it and go between the legs like he did,that was insane!!..and he actually lost the comp that year i believe.......but as nice as he was i just dont think he cud do the things that guys are doing nowadays in terms of dexterity and agility and moving the ball around in the air.not sure if you know this but kenny smith has called him "the most unathletic freak athlete in the league" cos he had crazy,crazy bounce and power/strength but did most things in a straight line,simple manner.....like for example i cudnt imagine him even attempting that between the legs windmill from just inside the free throw line that lavine just did yesterday...he wudnt have the quick twitch ability and dexterity or top end speed to make the momentum.

but hey thats just my opinion.

as incredible leapers as jordan,vince and lavine are i seriously think that gerald green out-jumps them all in pure verticality...i seen video of him doing insane stuff in practice when i think he was with pacers a few years ago....it actually looked like the video was doctored as you cudnt believe a human cud do it.

whilst its obviously not proper basketball i think youre in the wrong forum regardless.