Gordon won every dunk head 2 head besides levines first dunk of the night. judges suck. levines 3rd dunk in the championship was nearly the exact same dunk barton did in the first rd that got a 44
Are you drunk or do you not have any clue about dunking? Bartons first dunk wasnt even a clean dunk.
LaVines first 2 were better than Gordons first 2, Gordons mascots dunks were better than LaVine in those respective rounds, but in those rounds i wouldnt give LaVine under 50 points.
You have no clue how difficult it is to do what LaVine did, its just that hes that good he makes it look simple, but no1 can copy what LaVine did - which is why they aint standing in the Slam Dunk Contest and which is why they aint winning the slam dunk contest back to back.
0
Quote Originally Posted by podsox:
Gordon won every dunk head 2 head besides levines first dunk of the night. judges suck. levines 3rd dunk in the championship was nearly the exact same dunk barton did in the first rd that got a 44
Are you drunk or do you not have any clue about dunking? Bartons first dunk wasnt even a clean dunk.
LaVines first 2 were better than Gordons first 2, Gordons mascots dunks were better than LaVine in those respective rounds, but in those rounds i wouldnt give LaVine under 50 points.
You have no clue how difficult it is to do what LaVine did, its just that hes that good he makes it look simple, but no1 can copy what LaVine did - which is why they aint standing in the Slam Dunk Contest and which is why they aint winning the slam dunk contest back to back.
Are you drunk or do you not have any clue about dunking? Bartons first dunk wasnt even a clean dunk.
LaVines first 2 were better than Gordons first 2, Gordons mascots dunks were better than LaVine in those respective rounds, but in those rounds i wouldnt give LaVine under 50 points.
You have no clue how difficult it is to do what LaVine did, its just that hes that good he makes it look simple, but no1 can copy what LaVine did - which is why they aint standing in the Slam Dunk Contest and which is why they aint winning the slam dunk contest back to back.
Gordon used a mascot on his 2nd dunk. so he had the better dunks when using a mascot but lavine had the better first 2 dunks. okay then
0
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:
Are you drunk or do you not have any clue about dunking? Bartons first dunk wasnt even a clean dunk.
LaVines first 2 were better than Gordons first 2, Gordons mascots dunks were better than LaVine in those respective rounds, but in those rounds i wouldnt give LaVine under 50 points.
You have no clue how difficult it is to do what LaVine did, its just that hes that good he makes it look simple, but no1 can copy what LaVine did - which is why they aint standing in the Slam Dunk Contest and which is why they aint winning the slam dunk contest back to back.
Gordon used a mascot on his 2nd dunk. so he had the better dunks when using a mascot but lavine had the better first 2 dunks. okay then
regardless of arguments over who won you wud have been sweating your fu.kkin balls off waiting on that -250 ticket to cash as gordon brought it BIG TIME!!.....a stupid,stupid bet and another stupid thread by this clown.
0
regardless of arguments over who won you wud have been sweating your fu.kkin balls off waiting on that -250 ticket to cash as gordon brought it BIG TIME!!.....a stupid,stupid bet and another stupid thread by this clown.
regardless of arguments over who won you wud have been sweating your fu.kkin balls off waiting on that -250 ticket to cash as gordon brought it BIG TIME!!.....a stupid,stupid bet and another stupid thread by this clown.
Why would i be "sweating"? Can you tell me why? Because Gordon showed up but LaVine responded?
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
regardless of arguments over who won you wud have been sweating your fu.kkin balls off waiting on that -250 ticket to cash as gordon brought it BIG TIME!!.....a stupid,stupid bet and another stupid thread by this clown.
Why would i be "sweating"? Can you tell me why? Because Gordon showed up but LaVine responded?
Why would i be "sweating"? Can you tell me why? Because Gordon showed up but LaVine responded?
just the response expected from a fu.kking meat-head who had the panthers winning by 28 points..you are truly clueless...it was a toss of a coin and many,many good credible judges wud have given it to gordon you fu.kking dunce....THATS why you wud have been sweating after laying ridiculous juice...but your stupidity and inability to learn will allow this to just wash over you and you'll be back with a thread next week saying how warriors will never lose another game this year cos they are "so awesome" and "the best team ever,man!!!!".
0
Quote Originally Posted by Asomugha:
Why would i be "sweating"? Can you tell me why? Because Gordon showed up but LaVine responded?
just the response expected from a fu.kking meat-head who had the panthers winning by 28 points..you are truly clueless...it was a toss of a coin and many,many good credible judges wud have given it to gordon you fu.kking dunce....THATS why you wud have been sweating after laying ridiculous juice...but your stupidity and inability to learn will allow this to just wash over you and you'll be back with a thread next week saying how warriors will never lose another game this year cos they are "so awesome" and "the best team ever,man!!!!".
i took drummond +1200 like for 5 bucks, you fackin moron.
levine was like -160 and levine not to win wasn't offered so stop trollin bec you had the right pick. it was fix and levine shouldn't have won!!!
actually the best price for lavine was around -250 and much worse at many books....-160 wud have had me interested....seemed a bit fairer in a 4 horse race
0
Quote Originally Posted by nofix:
i took drummond +1200 like for 5 bucks, you fackin moron.
levine was like -160 and levine not to win wasn't offered so stop trollin bec you had the right pick. it was fix and levine shouldn't have won!!!
actually the best price for lavine was around -250 and much worse at many books....-160 wud have had me interested....seemed a bit fairer in a 4 horse race
just the response expected from a fu.kking meat-head who had the panthers winning by 28 points..you are truly clueless...it was a toss of a coin and many,many good credible judges wud have given it to gordon you fu.kking dunce....THATS why you wud have been sweating after laying ridiculous juice...but your stupidity and inability to learn will allow this to just wash over you and you'll be back with a thread next week saying how warriors will never lose another game this year cos they are "so awesome" and "the best team ever,man!!!!".
You clearly dont know anything. Ehh, how can they give it to Gordon? Tell me? Its not like they pick either LaVine or Gordon as the winner, they rate the dunks from 1-10 you fking imbecile. LaVine was awarded 50 points IN ALL OF HIS ATTEMPTS except for the 2nd one so therefore hes clearly and evidently the winner. Are you really that stupid? All of LaVines dunks were worth 50 points, many of Gordons were worth 50 points as well but not his last one so therefore LaVine pulled out as the correct winner. Giving LaVine under 50 on any of his attempts would be blasphemous. Are you too stupid to comprehend this?
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
just the response expected from a fu.kking meat-head who had the panthers winning by 28 points..you are truly clueless...it was a toss of a coin and many,many good credible judges wud have given it to gordon you fu.kking dunce....THATS why you wud have been sweating after laying ridiculous juice...but your stupidity and inability to learn will allow this to just wash over you and you'll be back with a thread next week saying how warriors will never lose another game this year cos they are "so awesome" and "the best team ever,man!!!!".
You clearly dont know anything. Ehh, how can they give it to Gordon? Tell me? Its not like they pick either LaVine or Gordon as the winner, they rate the dunks from 1-10 you fking imbecile. LaVine was awarded 50 points IN ALL OF HIS ATTEMPTS except for the 2nd one so therefore hes clearly and evidently the winner. Are you really that stupid? All of LaVines dunks were worth 50 points, many of Gordons were worth 50 points as well but not his last one so therefore LaVine pulled out as the correct winner. Giving LaVine under 50 on any of his attempts would be blasphemous. Are you too stupid to comprehend this?
360 windmill or 360 throught the legs, 720 and someone actually jumping from behind the free throw line is what I want to see them do next year. Co-winners was that a possibility last night. I don't know if it was in the rules for last nights dunk contest.
0
360 windmill or 360 throught the legs, 720 and someone actually jumping from behind the free throw line is what I want to see them do next year. Co-winners was that a possibility last night. I don't know if it was in the rules for last nights dunk contest.
ive never even heard of these guys levine and gordon. Are they even good baskeball players? there was a dunk contest last night? good lord, does anyone aside from teenagers even care about dunks anymore??
0
ive never even heard of these guys levine and gordon. Are they even good baskeball players? there was a dunk contest last night? good lord, does anyone aside from teenagers even care about dunks anymore??
Jason Richardson is with Vince a close second. Lavine would come in 3rd/4th/5th even after Gerald Green/Jordan/Wilkins.
hmmm,interesting choice scalabrine...richardson was nice and i have still yet to see another player throw the ball off the backboard,catch it and go between the legs like he did,that was insane!!..and he actually lost the comp that year i believe.......but as nice as he was i just dont think he cud do the things that guys are doing nowadays in terms of dexterity and agility and moving the ball around in the air.not sure if you know this but kenny smith has called him "the most unathletic freak athlete in the league" cos he had crazy,crazy bounce and power/strength but did most things in a straight line,simple manner.....like for example i cudnt imagine him even attempting that between the legs windmill from just inside the free throw line that lavine just did yesterday...he wudnt have the quick twitch ability and dexterity or top end speed to make the momentum.
but hey thats just my opinion.
as incredible leapers as jordan,vince and lavine are i seriously think that gerald green out-jumps them all in pure verticality...i seen video of him doing insane stuff in practice when i think he was with pacers a few years ago....it actually looked like the video was doctored as you cudnt believe a human cud do it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Good bet.
But Lavine is not the best dunker in history.
Jason Richardson is with Vince a close second. Lavine would come in 3rd/4th/5th even after Gerald Green/Jordan/Wilkins.
hmmm,interesting choice scalabrine...richardson was nice and i have still yet to see another player throw the ball off the backboard,catch it and go between the legs like he did,that was insane!!..and he actually lost the comp that year i believe.......but as nice as he was i just dont think he cud do the things that guys are doing nowadays in terms of dexterity and agility and moving the ball around in the air.not sure if you know this but kenny smith has called him "the most unathletic freak athlete in the league" cos he had crazy,crazy bounce and power/strength but did most things in a straight line,simple manner.....like for example i cudnt imagine him even attempting that between the legs windmill from just inside the free throw line that lavine just did yesterday...he wudnt have the quick twitch ability and dexterity or top end speed to make the momentum.
but hey thats just my opinion.
as incredible leapers as jordan,vince and lavine are i seriously think that gerald green out-jumps them all in pure verticality...i seen video of him doing insane stuff in practice when i think he was with pacers a few years ago....it actually looked like the video was doctored as you cudnt believe a human cud do it.
ive never even heard of these guys levine and gordon. Are they even good baskeball players? there was a dunk contest last night? good lord, does anyone aside from teenagers even care about dunks anymore??
whilst its obviously not proper basketball i think youre in the wrong forum regardless.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DavidAames:
ive never even heard of these guys levine and gordon. Are they even good baskeball players? there was a dunk contest last night? good lord, does anyone aside from teenagers even care about dunks anymore??
whilst its obviously not proper basketball i think youre in the wrong forum regardless.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.