All Forums | NBA Betting

May have another x20 play....

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4490
Posts: 219
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2017
Posts: 7191
Posted: #26

BOL BUDDY peace_5

Claim to Fame - beating Bill Rodgers in a race.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2016
Posts: 4036
Posted: #27

Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did.   soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao.   HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW??   this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha.   why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes??   he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead.....   it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really.

 

Damn u a lot of free time. War & Peavce novel right here.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2016
Posts: 6704
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did.   soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao.   HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW??   this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha.   why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes??   he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead.....   it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really.

He posted his record as 89-65 with no clarification that it was units or how he calculates it. I thought he was 89-65 like a normal record is kept. Wasn't until someone questioned him as to why he went from 69-65 to 89-65 over night. Then he explained that he added 20 wins to his record because it was a 20x play. That's just misleading and wrong. I have no clue why this is even a discussion. Lol

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #29

@jaybucko

 then he is +24 units.....

 

with no indication of how his picks have played out % wise.....

 

maybe he hit 3 dogs at insane payouts and lost every other bet......

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #30

@ThrowDemDarts

 dont worry about it, those 2 dont post much except to troll others

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #31

Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts:

Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did.   soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao.   HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW??   this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha.   why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes??   he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead.....   it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really. He posted his record as 89-65 with no clarification that it was units or how he calculates it. I thought he was 89-65 like a normal record is kept. Wasn't until someone questioned him as to why he went from 69-65 to 89-65 over night. Then he explained that he added 20 wins to his record because it was a 20x play. That's just misleading and wrong. I have no clue why this is even a discussion. Lol

 

na.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #32

Quote Originally Posted by Supersharpone:

Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: who gives a f*** what he bets or how..all he is indicating is that its a very strong play and how it will reflect on HIS own personal record/bankroll...if youre an actual adult you can make your own decision and follow/ignore as you please.no need to quibble or debate..very simple stuff. Nah, it's misleading as fuck. The last thread I saw from him he posted his record as 89-65, no where did he mention that he just added 20 wins to his record because he had a "20x" play. It wasn't until I read later on in the thread someone mentioned his record yesterday was 69-65 until he explained what he did.   soooooooooooo,he didnt actually do anything wrong but it was you who missed a detail because you dont follow regularly??i mean its not him to blame in that case..yes it is irregular to vary bet sizes to a large degree but if its stated prior to being posted then its hard to know what the issue is. You're wrong here. Posting misleading records is just wrong. That's the point of w/l records, it's universally known what they mean. Saying you are 89-64 when you are adding 20 wins to your record in one play is misleading and wrong. Solid thing to white knight for, lmao.   HOW IS IT MIS-LEADING TO STATE THAT YOU ARE BETTING 20x NORMAL AMOUNT AND THEN WHEN THE GAME IS OVER YOU ADD/SUBTRACT 20X NORMAL AMOUNT????WHO WAS MIS-LEAD AND HOW??   this is nothing to do with "white knight",its basic logic......the problem is that you dont follow the guy so its understandable that you feel you are being somehow "duped" because you didnt see how the results came about. You're white knighting the most ridiculous thing. He is explaining in this thread what he did last thread where he posted a w/l record of 89-65. He did not mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept in a way that counts games as 20 wins. So this thread is trying to explain that he is going to count this as 20 wins. I'm saying that is wrong to do and misleading. How you can disagree with that is what is shocking here, ha.   why would he have to mention anywhere in that thread that his record is kept based on varying bet sizes??   he posts the bet size BEFORE THE FUQQIN GAME and then adds/subtracts accordingly...yes,it is irregular compared to the common method of standard flat betting but everyone got their own style and if you were following regularly there would be zero confusion whatsoever. i am STILL WAITING for you to explain how you were mislead.....   it is YOUR OWN ASSUMPTION that there is only one standard method of flat betting and record-keeping that mislead YOURSELF.....bit of a shame really.   Damn u a lot of free time. War & Peavce novel right here.

 

eh,its the middle of the day.aint much to do.just waitin for games to start...maybe you just type slow??only takes 4-6 minutes to type 5 paragraphs.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2016
Posts: 6704
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:

@ThrowDemDarts  dont worry about it, those 2 dont post much except to troll others

Ha ha, that's true. Gotta be a serious professional troll to white knight something this ridiculous.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #34

Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts:

Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @ThrowDemDarts  dont worry about it, those 2 dont post much except to troll others Ha ha, that's true. Gotta be a serious professional troll to white knight something this ridiculous.

 

STILL WAITING for an explanation of what is ridiculous or misleading....to make an accusation of something and then not be able to justify it..THAT is "trolling" isnt it??thats what YOU are doing,baiting just to get a reaction or argument.i clearly stated the case as i can see it and you have yet to refute adequately....best of luck on your trolling endeavours.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2021
Posts: 116
Posted: #35

I am just waiting for Kush’s pick an_popcorn

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #36

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD

 

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #37

WOOOOOOOOOOOOO IF THE PREDS LOSE ILL BE 0- 10 TRILLION!!!!

 

A WORLD RECORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

 

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #38

Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD   WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
thumbs_uppeace_5

 

long as its clarified before the puck drops....best of luck...but one thing though,how many units is your bankroll?

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #39

HOW MANY UNITS.....TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON

 

 

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #40

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

PUCK DROPPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

THE TRILLION ON TRILLIONS PLAY TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #41

OMG PREDS UP 1-0 

 

10 TRILLION - 0!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!

 

WORLD RECORD

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #42

@melossinglet

 DAAAAAAAAA MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2021
Posts: 12900
Posted: #43

@melossinglet

 WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2020
Posts: 1432
Posted: #44

@Supersharpone

 an_roll_laughhahahahah even my wife doesn't text her side boyfriend this much in a day!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #45

Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD   WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

oh no,sorry it doesnt count..game had already started..this just makes you a deceitful liar...not too surprising.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #46

Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz:

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   LAYING DOWN 10 TRILLION BETS ON THE PREDATORS TONIGHT WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   GONNA HAVE A DOOOOOOOZY OF A RECORD EITHER WAY!! GOOD OR BAD   WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO   LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

oh no,sorry it doesnt count..game had already started..this just makes you a deceitful liar...not too surprising.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2016
Posts: 6704
Posted: #47

Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts: Quote Originally Posted by dubz4dummyz: @ThrowDemDarts  dont worry about it, those 2 dont post much except to troll others Ha ha, that's true. Gotta be a serious professional troll to white knight something this ridiculous.   STILL WAITING for an explanation of what is ridiculous or misleading....to make an accusation of something and then not be able to justify it..THAT is "trolling" isnt it??thats what YOU are doing,baiting just to get a reaction or argument.i clearly stated the case as i can see it and you have yet to refute adequately....best of luck on your trolling endeavours.

You don't understand how posting a record that counts wins like he does would be misleading? Like seriously? Are you slow or something?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2014
Posts: 45781
Posted: #48

an_violin

Mayweather bet 450000 on
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2019
Posts: 828
Posted: #49

What kind of fuckery is this? A play that counts as 20? Lmaooo

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2016
Posts: 6704
Posted: #50

Quote Originally Posted by Slappers:

What kind of fuckery is this? A play that counts as 20? Lmaooo

And there's people white knighting it, ha ha. 

All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.