Agree with AussieDownUndie = good research Wagers... but disagree w/ Aus's deductions. In fact, 180 deg apart. NBA Blowouts most often go under. Period. Same in cbb. That's B-Ball.
Clipps blowouts of fakers fall under. On top of that, because they play again tomorrow, they'll get a huge lead, and then rest starters for tomorrow's more taxing match.
More disagreement with Aus's "logic" is the fact that 5 straight LAC/LAL under the total, especially under are the blowouts when Clipps get to use the home-team lockers. Doubt very much that 'The Staples Center' has meaning to those "down undies"
Your Blazes face Kings, who've been ballin of late, always play hard after short breaks, always play harder at home, Historically play 3 unders then the last 4th match in Sac flys over vs. Bla's - so over 222 is it.
Aussie down undies, Really not saying your logic is nonsense ...it's just in these situations like Port vs. Sac knew a bit better the history, these situations, and their significance...nailed it right on the money = 222
Also, Blowout which u didn't see coming ...but really, only saw what is inevitable and, tried to tell u what happens then ...under = 103 - 81 way, way under 208
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pendo:
Agree with AussieDownUndie = good research Wagers... but disagree w/ Aus's deductions. In fact, 180 deg apart. NBA Blowouts most often go under. Period. Same in cbb. That's B-Ball.
Clipps blowouts of fakers fall under. On top of that, because they play again tomorrow, they'll get a huge lead, and then rest starters for tomorrow's more taxing match.
More disagreement with Aus's "logic" is the fact that 5 straight LAC/LAL under the total, especially under are the blowouts when Clipps get to use the home-team lockers. Doubt very much that 'The Staples Center' has meaning to those "down undies"
Your Blazes face Kings, who've been ballin of late, always play hard after short breaks, always play harder at home, Historically play 3 unders then the last 4th match in Sac flys over vs. Bla's - so over 222 is it.
Aussie down undies, Really not saying your logic is nonsense ...it's just in these situations like Port vs. Sac knew a bit better the history, these situations, and their significance...nailed it right on the money = 222
Also, Blowout which u didn't see coming ...but really, only saw what is inevitable and, tried to tell u what happens then ...under = 103 - 81 way, way under 208
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.