Home team is 15-3 in Game 7. In the last 4 game 7's the home team is 4-0 SU 3-1 ATS Home teams are 101-24 in all game 7's. Warriors are 3-1 in Game 7 at home Cavs are 0-2 in Game 7 on the road Last time a road team won in a game 7 of the finals was 1978. The regular season MVP is 6-1 in the finals Game 7 all time. How many times did the team up 3-1 in the finals win if it went to game 7? Every damn time.....
I already won enough with the Cavs in games 3,5, &6. Now it's time to smash the Warriors. Just waiting for a good time to lock it in. I will go with the numbers and history. Percentage is hugely in Warriors favor.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Home team is 15-3 in Game 7. In the last 4 game 7's the home team is 4-0 SU 3-1 ATS Home teams are 101-24 in all game 7's. Warriors are 3-1 in Game 7 at home Cavs are 0-2 in Game 7 on the road Last time a road team won in a game 7 of the finals was 1978. The regular season MVP is 6-1 in the finals Game 7 all time. How many times did the team up 3-1 in the finals win if it went to game 7? Every damn time.....
I already won enough with the Cavs in games 3,5, &6. Now it's time to smash the Warriors. Just waiting for a good time to lock it in. I will go with the numbers and history. Percentage is hugely in Warriors favor.
Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals.
The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5.
Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year?
0
Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals.
The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5.
Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year?
Home team is 15-3 in Game 7. In the last 4 game 7's the home team is 4-0 SU 3-1 ATS Home teams are 101-24 in all game 7's. Warriors are 3-1 in Game 7 at home Cavs are 0-2 in Game 7 on the road Last time a road team won in a game 7 of the finals was 1978. The regular season MVP is 6-1 in the finals Game 7 all time. How many times did the team up 3-1 in the finals win if it went to game 7? Every damn time.....
I already won enough with the Cavs in games 3,5, &6. Now it's time to smash the Warriors. Just waiting for a good time to lock it in. I will go with the numbers and history. Percentage is hugely in Warriors favor.
Totally agree, this is a great set up from the freaking league. Lebron crying queen winning streak will end on Sunday and he will not get another 41 points. Like I mention from my previous thread, Lebron Queen will win game 6 but he will get blow out on game 7. Lebron got all the help from this freaking league by suspended Green in game 5. The Queen stepped over the man's head; what do you expect Green to respond?. Cover his head for Lebron Queen to step over?. David Price from the Red Sox said "the NBA is fixed". Majority of people on this forum think that the Queen will win on Sunday and start pouring $$$$$ on it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mortgageguru:
Home team is 15-3 in Game 7. In the last 4 game 7's the home team is 4-0 SU 3-1 ATS Home teams are 101-24 in all game 7's. Warriors are 3-1 in Game 7 at home Cavs are 0-2 in Game 7 on the road Last time a road team won in a game 7 of the finals was 1978. The regular season MVP is 6-1 in the finals Game 7 all time. How many times did the team up 3-1 in the finals win if it went to game 7? Every damn time.....
I already won enough with the Cavs in games 3,5, &6. Now it's time to smash the Warriors. Just waiting for a good time to lock it in. I will go with the numbers and history. Percentage is hugely in Warriors favor.
Totally agree, this is a great set up from the freaking league. Lebron crying queen winning streak will end on Sunday and he will not get another 41 points. Like I mention from my previous thread, Lebron Queen will win game 6 but he will get blow out on game 7. Lebron got all the help from this freaking league by suspended Green in game 5. The Queen stepped over the man's head; what do you expect Green to respond?. Cover his head for Lebron Queen to step over?. David Price from the Red Sox said "the NBA is fixed". Majority of people on this forum think that the Queen will win on Sunday and start pouring $$$$$ on it.
Cavs are 0-2 in game 7's. They are avg at best on the road. Don't let the past 2 games fool you. They will drug up Iggy so he won't feel anything. All hands on deck for the season finale with the championship on the line. This is why home teams are able to deliver. This is why it's literally impossible for teams to come back from a 1-3 deficit especially in the finals. Historic stats are important and can't be overlooked. If the Cavs cover so be it. But I will take the Warriors in this situation every time. Should buy it down to a key number of 4 since game 7's are usually a tight and nervous contest. Under looks great also. Last 4 final game 7's have all gone under.
0
Cavs are 0-2 in game 7's. They are avg at best on the road. Don't let the past 2 games fool you. They will drug up Iggy so he won't feel anything. All hands on deck for the season finale with the championship on the line. This is why home teams are able to deliver. This is why it's literally impossible for teams to come back from a 1-3 deficit especially in the finals. Historic stats are important and can't be overlooked. If the Cavs cover so be it. But I will take the Warriors in this situation every time. Should buy it down to a key number of 4 since game 7's are usually a tight and nervous contest. Under looks great also. Last 4 final game 7's have all gone under.
Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals. The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5.Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year?
I saw that stat as well but not enough to sway me. It's also literally impossible to win 3 straight against the same team in a series
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals. The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5.Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year?
I saw that stat as well but not enough to sway me. It's also literally impossible to win 3 straight against the same team in a series
Historical stats....again...... I think there are enough out there that supports the dubs. Newsflash? You put that money on dubs. I'm going the other way. Historical stats don't matter once the tip off happens. The game gets played on the court; it's one game. Enjoy
0
Historical stats....again...... I think there are enough out there that supports the dubs. Newsflash? You put that money on dubs. I'm going the other way. Historical stats don't matter once the tip off happens. The game gets played on the court; it's one game. Enjoy
You can lay the 4.5 if you must but Cavs are not winning this game and in my opinion people taking the Cavs are simply buying into the hype and will be thoroughly disappointed come Sunday night.
Cavs backers are being set up, so obvious!
GL to All!
0
Wow, finally a thread with intelligent posters.
GS ML is the absolute way to go.
You can lay the 4.5 if you must but Cavs are not winning this game and in my opinion people taking the Cavs are simply buying into the hype and will be thoroughly disappointed come Sunday night.
Wow, finally a thread with intelligent posters.GS ML is the absolute way to go.You can lay the 4.5 if you must but Cavs are not winning this game and in my opinion people taking the Cavs are simply buying into the hype and will be thoroughly disappointed come Sunday night.Cavs backers are being set up, so obvious!GL to All!
I agree. It's gonna be close and should come down to the final minute. 5 pts is nothing in the nba. It can win or lose depending on the last 2 positions. I will just go ml or wait to play 2nd half. Cavs look like they can take it but will take a third game in a row where Lebron plays like the finals MVP and Kyrie is his Robin. If this doesn't happen it will be a steep hill to climb. Gonna be a great game regardless. Enjoy and good luck guys!
0
Quote Originally Posted by tonyrome:
Wow, finally a thread with intelligent posters.GS ML is the absolute way to go.You can lay the 4.5 if you must but Cavs are not winning this game and in my opinion people taking the Cavs are simply buying into the hype and will be thoroughly disappointed come Sunday night.Cavs backers are being set up, so obvious!GL to All!
I agree. It's gonna be close and should come down to the final minute. 5 pts is nothing in the nba. It can win or lose depending on the last 2 positions. I will just go ml or wait to play 2nd half. Cavs look like they can take it but will take a third game in a row where Lebron plays like the finals MVP and Kyrie is his Robin. If this doesn't happen it will be a steep hill to climb. Gonna be a great game regardless. Enjoy and good luck guys!
Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals.
The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5.
Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year?
Thanks bro
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals.
The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5.
Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year?
Last game of the season ..,Golden State at home coming from 2 consecutive losses..,they will get the job done.
Totally agree. I thought they wouldn't be as hungry to win it but after breaking the Bulls record they want this championship more than ever. This would put them as THE best teams ever. Lebron has added fuel to the fire by talking smack....they celebrated game 6 like they just won the finals. They're getting too arrogant now and we all know what happens when teams start getting big headed. Dubs handle their business tomorrow
0
Quote Originally Posted by lacral:
Last game of the season ..,Golden State at home coming from 2 consecutive losses..,they will get the job done.
Totally agree. I thought they wouldn't be as hungry to win it but after breaking the Bulls record they want this championship more than ever. This would put them as THE best teams ever. Lebron has added fuel to the fire by talking smack....they celebrated game 6 like they just won the finals. They're getting too arrogant now and we all know what happens when teams start getting big headed. Dubs handle their business tomorrow
Betcrimes so i take it you like the Cavs to win it?
Home teams have generally ruled this situation historically, but here there are things on the ground which undermine past stats.
Iggy is lame to what degree?
Curry is lame to X degree thus his output has been inconsistent these finals.
Bogut is so lame he isn't even present (in the 8 playoff games prior to this game 7 that Bogut has been unable to play at least 14 mins in, GS trailed at half-time: is Bogut going to play 14+ mins in this coming game?)
Barnes has gone completely AWOL on offense (2/22 L2 games).
In short, this isn't the same Warriors team that was firing on all cylinders to set a new reg. season record, it's an inferior version. If all these players were healthy & in the zone, GS would obviously be the no-brainer choice, but then if they functioning like that this series would not still be being played. The very fact it's still going on points to the Cavs having capitalized on said issues. So the question someone thinking about betting on this game is, why are they going to stop capitalizing on those issues in this next game? Is Bogut suddenly fit? Curry suddenly fully fit? Iggy suddenly free of back issues? Has Barnes suddenly found his stroke & no longer utterly AWOL?
Logic dictates that Klay Thompson & Draymond Green will be key figures in deciding where this game goes. If those 2 don't fire, GS could get not just beaten but buried. I'm going to have numerous options into this game with live betting at my book, so I can afford to wait and see the early going before making a commitment. But to those who fancy GS for pre-match betting, I suggest looking at Thompson & Green props, they'll pay a lot better than the GS ml & they can still win even if GS lose the game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bmiller1632:
Betcrimes so i take it you like the Cavs to win it?
Home teams have generally ruled this situation historically, but here there are things on the ground which undermine past stats.
Iggy is lame to what degree?
Curry is lame to X degree thus his output has been inconsistent these finals.
Bogut is so lame he isn't even present (in the 8 playoff games prior to this game 7 that Bogut has been unable to play at least 14 mins in, GS trailed at half-time: is Bogut going to play 14+ mins in this coming game?)
Barnes has gone completely AWOL on offense (2/22 L2 games).
In short, this isn't the same Warriors team that was firing on all cylinders to set a new reg. season record, it's an inferior version. If all these players were healthy & in the zone, GS would obviously be the no-brainer choice, but then if they functioning like that this series would not still be being played. The very fact it's still going on points to the Cavs having capitalized on said issues. So the question someone thinking about betting on this game is, why are they going to stop capitalizing on those issues in this next game? Is Bogut suddenly fit? Curry suddenly fully fit? Iggy suddenly free of back issues? Has Barnes suddenly found his stroke & no longer utterly AWOL?
Logic dictates that Klay Thompson & Draymond Green will be key figures in deciding where this game goes. If those 2 don't fire, GS could get not just beaten but buried. I'm going to have numerous options into this game with live betting at my book, so I can afford to wait and see the early going before making a commitment. But to those who fancy GS for pre-match betting, I suggest looking at Thompson & Green props, they'll pay a lot better than the GS ml & they can still win even if GS lose the game.
Betcrimes so i take it you like the Cavs to win it?
Home teams have generally ruled this situation historically, but here there are things on the ground which undermine past stats.Iggy is lame to what degree? Curry is lame to X degree thus his output has been inconsistent these finals. Bogut is so lame he isn't even present (in the 8 playoff games prior to this game 7 that Bogut has been unable to play at least 14 mins in, GS trailed at half-time: is Bogut going to play 14+ mins in this coming game?)Barnes has gone completely AWOL on offense (2/22 L2 games).In short, this isn't the same Warriors team that was firing on all cylinders to set a new reg. season record, it's an inferior version. If all these players were healthy & in the zone, GS would obviously be the no-brainer choice, but then if they functioning like that this series would not still be being played. The very fact it's still going on points to the Cavs having capitalized on said issues. So the question someone thinking about betting on this game is, why are they going to stop capitalizing on those issues in this next game? Is Bogut suddenly fit? Curry suddenly fully fit? Iggy suddenly free of back issues? Has Barnes suddenly found his stroke & no longer utterly AWOL?Logic dictates that Klay Thompson & Draymond Green will be key figures in deciding where this game goes. If those 2 don't fire, GS could get not just beaten but buried. I'm going to have numerous options into this game with live betting at my book, so I can afford to wait and see the early going before making a commitment. But to those who fancy GS for pre-match betting, I suggest looking at Thompson & Green props, they'll pay a lot better than the GS ml & they can still win even if GS lose the game.
I would agree with you but look at what happened in games 1,2 & 4. Curry and klay didn't shoot well and they still won significantly. Games 5&6 is what people remember since Lebron went nuts. Remember this is not just any game. This is a game 7. Also how many teams came back from a 3-1 deficit then lost after being up 3-1. I don't remember at all. Either way I think history prevails again. Golden state is like 6-9 points better at home and Cavs are like 10+ points worse on the road. This is just my calculation that I use but just makes more sense for Warriors to cover than the Cavs do.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
Quote Originally Posted by bmiller1632:
Betcrimes so i take it you like the Cavs to win it?
Home teams have generally ruled this situation historically, but here there are things on the ground which undermine past stats.Iggy is lame to what degree? Curry is lame to X degree thus his output has been inconsistent these finals. Bogut is so lame he isn't even present (in the 8 playoff games prior to this game 7 that Bogut has been unable to play at least 14 mins in, GS trailed at half-time: is Bogut going to play 14+ mins in this coming game?)Barnes has gone completely AWOL on offense (2/22 L2 games).In short, this isn't the same Warriors team that was firing on all cylinders to set a new reg. season record, it's an inferior version. If all these players were healthy & in the zone, GS would obviously be the no-brainer choice, but then if they functioning like that this series would not still be being played. The very fact it's still going on points to the Cavs having capitalized on said issues. So the question someone thinking about betting on this game is, why are they going to stop capitalizing on those issues in this next game? Is Bogut suddenly fit? Curry suddenly fully fit? Iggy suddenly free of back issues? Has Barnes suddenly found his stroke & no longer utterly AWOL?Logic dictates that Klay Thompson & Draymond Green will be key figures in deciding where this game goes. If those 2 don't fire, GS could get not just beaten but buried. I'm going to have numerous options into this game with live betting at my book, so I can afford to wait and see the early going before making a commitment. But to those who fancy GS for pre-match betting, I suggest looking at Thompson & Green props, they'll pay a lot better than the GS ml & they can still win even if GS lose the game.
I would agree with you but look at what happened in games 1,2 & 4. Curry and klay didn't shoot well and they still won significantly. Games 5&6 is what people remember since Lebron went nuts. Remember this is not just any game. This is a game 7. Also how many teams came back from a 3-1 deficit then lost after being up 3-1. I don't remember at all. Either way I think history prevails again. Golden state is like 6-9 points better at home and Cavs are like 10+ points worse on the road. This is just my calculation that I use but just makes more sense for Warriors to cover than the Cavs do.
You can lay the 4.5 if you must but Cavs are not winning this game and in my opinion people taking the Cavs are simply buying into the hype and will be thoroughly disappointed come Sunday night.
Cavs backers are being set up, so obvious!
GL to All!
We'll see about that after the game!
0
Quote Originally Posted by tonyrome:
Wow, finally a thread with intelligent posters.
GS ML is the absolute way to go.
You can lay the 4.5 if you must but Cavs are not winning this game and in my opinion people taking the Cavs are simply buying into the hype and will be thoroughly disappointed come Sunday night.
9 times NBA teams were able to erase a 3-1 deficit to win the series. Then in the next round those teams are 6-3 winning that series. More history that favors Dubs.
0
9 times NBA teams were able to erase a 3-1 deficit to win the series. Then in the next round those teams are 6-3 winning that series. More history that favors Dubs.
9 times NBA teams were able to erase a 3-1 deficit to win the series. Then in the next round those teams are 6-3 winning that series. More history that favors Dubs.
2 of those 6 teams to win their next series were only playing 2nd round opponents: a situation that has no historical resemblance to the Dubs situation (of playing a Conference champion caliber opponent), so naturally those 2 results are completely irrelevant.
Since the ABA-NBA merger, there have been 2 teams who erased a 3-1 deficit to win their Conference finals: those 2 teams then went 1-1 in the NBA finals proper. Specific history does not favour the Dubs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mortgageguru:
9 times NBA teams were able to erase a 3-1 deficit to win the series. Then in the next round those teams are 6-3 winning that series. More history that favors Dubs.
2 of those 6 teams to win their next series were only playing 2nd round opponents: a situation that has no historical resemblance to the Dubs situation (of playing a Conference champion caliber opponent), so naturally those 2 results are completely irrelevant.
Since the ABA-NBA merger, there have been 2 teams who erased a 3-1 deficit to win their Conference finals: those 2 teams then went 1-1 in the NBA finals proper. Specific history does not favour the Dubs.
9 times NBA teams were able to erase a 3-1 deficit to win the series. Then in the next round those teams are 6-3 winning that series. More history that favors Dubs.
2 of those 6 teams to win their next series were only playing 2nd round opponents: a situation that has no historical resemblance to the Dubs situation (of playing a Conference champion caliber opponent), so naturally those 2 results are completely irrelevant.Since the ABA-NBA merger, there have been 2 teams who erased a 3-1 deficit to win their Conference finals: those 2 teams then went 1-1 in the NBA finals proper. Specific history does not favour the Dubs.
Yes that is very true. The fact that no team was able to come back from a 3-1 deficit in the finals is the only point. The rest of the facts merely support it. Teams tend to let down after winning a couple of games. It's not by choice and human nature kicks in. The desperate and angry look dissapeared in the second half of game 6. Lebron and co were getting a lil goofy, chucking up 3's, flopped to get foul calls, and celebrated with big smiles. After seeing that I lost total confidence for Cavs. Either way I think historical data supports Dubs winning tonight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
Quote Originally Posted by Mortgageguru:
9 times NBA teams were able to erase a 3-1 deficit to win the series. Then in the next round those teams are 6-3 winning that series. More history that favors Dubs.
2 of those 6 teams to win their next series were only playing 2nd round opponents: a situation that has no historical resemblance to the Dubs situation (of playing a Conference champion caliber opponent), so naturally those 2 results are completely irrelevant.Since the ABA-NBA merger, there have been 2 teams who erased a 3-1 deficit to win their Conference finals: those 2 teams then went 1-1 in the NBA finals proper. Specific history does not favour the Dubs.
Yes that is very true. The fact that no team was able to come back from a 3-1 deficit in the finals is the only point. The rest of the facts merely support it. Teams tend to let down after winning a couple of games. It's not by choice and human nature kicks in. The desperate and angry look dissapeared in the second half of game 6. Lebron and co were getting a lil goofy, chucking up 3's, flopped to get foul calls, and celebrated with big smiles. After seeing that I lost total confidence for Cavs. Either way I think historical data supports Dubs winning tonight.
Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals.
The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5.
Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year?
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
Since the ABA-NBA merger in 1976, there has been 6 previous occasions where the same two teams played each other in consecutive NBA finals.
The record of the team who won the initial finals meeting in the second finals? 1-5. The one exception to avoid losing had Michael Jordan in its starting 5.
Q: Who won the initial finals meeting between these two teams last year?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
I think there are enough out there that supports the dubs. Newsflash? You put that money on dubs. I'm going the other way. Historical stats don't matter once the tip off happens. The game gets played on the court; it's one game. Enjoy
Hot Forum Topics
