It's been evident this season that certain teams have to be paced out...my projections have been really good this season...sitting at +67 just on totals,
but select teams...CLE, MEM, ATL, CHI, etc their point totals go so high that it will always pick under. Goin back and runnning some simple calculus formulas for pace per team, it seems to have corrected this. I will and have made separate sheets to compare as the season unfolds. What's wild is that despite those high total under always losing, I'm still sitting at 67u on totals.
Well, onto today's card.
GSW +8.5
OKC -2.5
SAC +10.5
GSW O221
OKC U226.5
CHI U244
DEN O218.5
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
It's been evident this season that certain teams have to be paced out...my projections have been really good this season...sitting at +67 just on totals,
but select teams...CLE, MEM, ATL, CHI, etc their point totals go so high that it will always pick under. Goin back and runnning some simple calculus formulas for pace per team, it seems to have corrected this. I will and have made separate sheets to compare as the season unfolds. What's wild is that despite those high total under always losing, I'm still sitting at 67u on totals.
It's been evident this season that certain teams have to be paced out...my projections have been really good this season...sitting at +67 just on totals, but select teams...CLE, MEM, ATL, CHI, etc their point totals go so high that it will always pick under. Goin back and runnning some simple calculus formulas for pace per team, it seems to have corrected this. I will and have made separate sheets to compare as the season unfolds. What's wild is that despite those high total under always losing, I'm still sitting at 67u on totals. Well, onto today's card. GSW +8.5 OKC -2.5 SAC +10.5 GSW O221 OKC U226.5 CHI U244 DEN O218.5
First off Good Luck
secondly just telling us your up 67 units doesnt help us, because we need to know how many units are being placed on the picks. Also a won / loss record would help.
are you playing 1 unit a game or 20 units a game? Are all the games for the same bets? Thats why it would be helpful if you told us how your placing the bets.
Thanks
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
It's been evident this season that certain teams have to be paced out...my projections have been really good this season...sitting at +67 just on totals, but select teams...CLE, MEM, ATL, CHI, etc their point totals go so high that it will always pick under. Goin back and runnning some simple calculus formulas for pace per team, it seems to have corrected this. I will and have made separate sheets to compare as the season unfolds. What's wild is that despite those high total under always losing, I'm still sitting at 67u on totals. Well, onto today's card. GSW +8.5 OKC -2.5 SAC +10.5 GSW O221 OKC U226.5 CHI U244 DEN O218.5
First off Good Luck
secondly just telling us your up 67 units doesnt help us, because we need to know how many units are being placed on the picks. Also a won / loss record would help.
are you playing 1 unit a game or 20 units a game? Are all the games for the same bets? Thats why it would be helpful if you told us how your placing the bets.
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: It's been evident this season that certain teams have to be paced out...my projections have been really good this season...sitting at +67 just on totals, but select teams...CLE, MEM, ATL, CHI, etc their point totals go so high that it will always pick under. Goin back and runnning some simple calculus formulas for pace per team, it seems to have corrected this. I will and have made separate sheets to compare as the season unfolds. What's wild is that despite those high total under always losing, I'm still sitting at 67u on totals. Well, onto today's card. GSW +8.5 OKC -2.5 SAC +10.5 GSW O221 OKC U226.5 CHI U244 DEN O218.5 First off Good Luck secondly just telling us your up 67 units doesnt help us, because we need to know how many units are being placed on the picks. Also a won / loss record would help. are you playing 1 unit a game or 20 units a game? Are all the games for the same bets? Thats why it would be helpful if you told us how your placing the bets. Thanks
TOTAL YTD 224-149 +67.6
EVERY wager is 1u.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: It's been evident this season that certain teams have to be paced out...my projections have been really good this season...sitting at +67 just on totals, but select teams...CLE, MEM, ATL, CHI, etc their point totals go so high that it will always pick under. Goin back and runnning some simple calculus formulas for pace per team, it seems to have corrected this. I will and have made separate sheets to compare as the season unfolds. What's wild is that despite those high total under always losing, I'm still sitting at 67u on totals. Well, onto today's card. GSW +8.5 OKC -2.5 SAC +10.5 GSW O221 OKC U226.5 CHI U244 DEN O218.5 First off Good Luck secondly just telling us your up 67 units doesnt help us, because we need to know how many units are being placed on the picks. Also a won / loss record would help. are you playing 1 unit a game or 20 units a game? Are all the games for the same bets? Thats why it would be helpful if you told us how your placing the bets. Thanks
Quote Originally Posted by umgmu: The warriors lost 108-96; if you had +8.5, you lost..so not a sweep.CAN you read? clearly stated cancel on gsw due to starters out
Can you add, OKC/NYK went over 226 so that's not a sweep.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
Quote Originally Posted by umgmu: The warriors lost 108-96; if you had +8.5, you lost..so not a sweep.CAN you read? clearly stated cancel on gsw due to starters out
Can you add, OKC/NYK went over 226 so that's not a sweep.
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: Quote Originally Posted by umgmu: The warriors lost 108-96; if you had +8.5, you lost..so not a sweep.CAN you read? clearly stated cancel on gsw due to starters out Can you add, OKC/NYK went over 226 so that's not a sweep.
my ticket was 227.5...I just posted 226 because that was the current line
0
Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan:
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: Quote Originally Posted by umgmu: The warriors lost 108-96; if you had +8.5, you lost..so not a sweep.CAN you read? clearly stated cancel on gsw due to starters out Can you add, OKC/NYK went over 226 so that's not a sweep.
my ticket was 227.5...I just posted 226 because that was the current line
Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan: Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: Quote Originally Posted by umgmu: The warriors lost 108-96; if you had +8.5, you lost..so not a sweep.CAN you read? clearly stated cancel on gsw due to starters out Can you add, OKC/NYK went over 226 so that's not a sweep.my ticket was 227.5...I just posted 226 because that was the current line
Hindsight
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan: Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: Quote Originally Posted by umgmu: The warriors lost 108-96; if you had +8.5, you lost..so not a sweep.CAN you read? clearly stated cancel on gsw due to starters out Can you add, OKC/NYK went over 226 so that's not a sweep.my ticket was 227.5...I just posted 226 because that was the current line
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: actually, no problem. 4-1 on the covers record. i placed the wager 2:38p on pinnacle...i could care less what a covers troll thinks I could care less when you bet it or where, but let's not conveniently add a point when it hooks.
genuis, check the bet stamp...2:38p it was 228. Nothing convenient about anything. Now run back to the basement
0
Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan:
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: actually, no problem. 4-1 on the covers record. i placed the wager 2:38p on pinnacle...i could care less what a covers troll thinks I could care less when you bet it or where, but let's not conveniently add a point when it hooks.
genuis, check the bet stamp...2:38p it was 228. Nothing convenient about anything. Now run back to the basement
Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan: Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: actually, no problem. 4-1 on the covers record. i placed the wager 2:38p on pinnacle...i could care less what a covers troll thinks I could care less when you bet it or where, but let's not conveniently add a point when it hooks.genuis, check the bet stamp...2:38p it was 228. Nothing convenient about anything. Now run back to the basement
Lmao you said you posted 226 but your ticket was 227.5 and now it's 228? O K
What odds then?
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan: Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: actually, no problem. 4-1 on the covers record. i placed the wager 2:38p on pinnacle...i could care less what a covers troll thinks I could care less when you bet it or where, but let's not conveniently add a point when it hooks.genuis, check the bet stamp...2:38p it was 228. Nothing convenient about anything. Now run back to the basement
Lmao you said you posted 226 but your ticket was 227.5 and now it's 228? O K
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan: Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: actually, no problem. 4-1 on the covers record. i placed the wager 2:38p on pinnacle...i could care less what a covers troll thinks I could care less when you bet it or where, but let's not conveniently add a point when it hooks.genuis, check the bet stamp...2:38p it was 228. Nothing convenient about anything. Now run back to the basement Lmao you said you posted 226 but your ticket was 227.5 and now it's 228? O K What odds then?
not sure why this is difficult for you to understand.
My wager as 227.5/228, placed at pinnacle.
i posted a readily available number of 226.5 for anyone following.
so count it as a loss to my covers record, my balance is all I care about.
Understand?
0
Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan:
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: Quote Originally Posted by emoltzan: Quote Originally Posted by smartbets: actually, no problem. 4-1 on the covers record. i placed the wager 2:38p on pinnacle...i could care less what a covers troll thinks I could care less when you bet it or where, but let's not conveniently add a point when it hooks.genuis, check the bet stamp...2:38p it was 228. Nothing convenient about anything. Now run back to the basement Lmao you said you posted 226 but your ticket was 227.5 and now it's 228? O K What odds then?
not sure why this is difficult for you to understand.
My wager as 227.5/228, placed at pinnacle.
i posted a readily available number of 226.5 for anyone following.
so count it as a loss to my covers record, my balance is all I care about.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
