ax, i have a quick question in regards to capping unders. i suck at totals. i saw the last match up between utah vs orlando and the total was set at 201. i think both teams combined to score 197 and the total went under. if the total went under, why is the total for this match up set at 4 points higher than the previous match up? i was just wondering why the odds makers would increase the total 4 points if the previous match up went under? thanks
chase, i'm thinking UTA 3OT game yesterday=tired legs= no defense...and public places heavy emphasis on this. just my best guess.
0
Quote Originally Posted by chasing2day:
ax, i have a quick question in regards to capping unders. i suck at totals. i saw the last match up between utah vs orlando and the total was set at 201. i think both teams combined to score 197 and the total went under. if the total went under, why is the total for this match up set at 4 points higher than the previous match up? i was just wondering why the odds makers would increase the total 4 points if the previous match up went under? thanks
chase, i'm thinking UTA 3OT game yesterday=tired legs= no defense...and public places heavy emphasis on this. just my best guess.
If you jump with me on the GS under I wish us the best I think the game will end 235-240. This is the only game where I think: under or no play. And this doesn't happen so often
BOL Crockie, I know you had to pull the trigger since it's almost bedtime for ya. I'm going to hold off since I have a whole day.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Crockie:
If you jump with me on the GS under I wish us the best I think the game will end 235-240. This is the only game where I think: under or no play. And this doesn't happen so often
BOL Crockie, I know you had to pull the trigger since it's almost bedtime for ya. I'm going to hold off since I have a whole day.
The LA Clippers have lost their last 7 games averaging 90.8 points per game ... sooo the under 203 1/2 looks inviting since NJ hasn't scored 114 points in a game since their home win over Denver back in the beginning of February when all the players sampled Five-Hour Energy drinks before the game !!!
0
The LA Clippers have lost their last 7 games averaging 90.8 points per game ... sooo the under 203 1/2 looks inviting since NJ hasn't scored 114 points in a game since their home win over Denver back in the beginning of February when all the players sampled Five-Hour Energy drinks before the game !!!
The LA Clippers have lost their last 7 games averaging 90.8 points per game ... sooo the under 203 1/2 looks inviting since NJ hasn't scored 114 points in a game since their home win over Denver back in the beginning of February when all the players sampled Five-Hour Energy drinks before the game !!!
Damn Chump, completely overlooked that. That's a very good point. I have about 8 hours left on that one, going to start running numbers. Thanks pal..
0
Quote Originally Posted by chump:
The LA Clippers have lost their last 7 games averaging 90.8 points per game ... sooo the under 203 1/2 looks inviting since NJ hasn't scored 114 points in a game since their home win over Denver back in the beginning of February when all the players sampled Five-Hour Energy drinks before the game !!!
Damn Chump, completely overlooked that. That's a very good point. I have about 8 hours left on that one, going to start running numbers. Thanks pal..
Hey Ax, I'm already with you on UTA/ORL but I'll stay away from the PHO/GSW under even @ 244
I also like a game which seems to fly under the radar. I'm talking about MIA/PHI with the line set @ 197. The average total in previous meetings this season was 185. Okay, recently both teams put some decent numbers on the board, but with MIA coming from that 3OT game with tired legs and PHI dictating their pace do you expect to see that many points?
0
Hey Ax, I'm already with you on UTA/ORL but I'll stay away from the PHO/GSW under even @ 244
I also like a game which seems to fly under the radar. I'm talking about MIA/PHI with the line set @ 197. The average total in previous meetings this season was 185. Okay, recently both teams put some decent numbers on the board, but with MIA coming from that 3OT game with tired legs and PHI dictating their pace do you expect to see that many points?
Hey Ax, I'm already with you on UTA/ORL but I'll stay away from the PHO/GSW under even @ 244
I also like a game which seems to fly under the radar. I'm talking about MIA/PHI with the line set @ 197. The average total in previous meetings this season was 185. Okay, recently both teams put some decent numbers on the board, but with MIA coming from that 3OT game with tired legs and PHI dictating their pace do you expect to see that many points?
Slinger...yeah bro, it's exactly those recent numbers that throws me off. Not just Miami's but the PHI defense also giving up a little more lately. If PHI dictates and stays true to form at home like they've been doing most of the season and discarding some of both team's recent play, this doesn't get out of the 180's. I just can't pull the trigger on this though. I wish you luck and will be rooting for this to go under!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ole_Gunslinger:
Hey Ax, I'm already with you on UTA/ORL but I'll stay away from the PHO/GSW under even @ 244
I also like a game which seems to fly under the radar. I'm talking about MIA/PHI with the line set @ 197. The average total in previous meetings this season was 185. Okay, recently both teams put some decent numbers on the board, but with MIA coming from that 3OT game with tired legs and PHI dictating their pace do you expect to see that many points?
Slinger...yeah bro, it's exactly those recent numbers that throws me off. Not just Miami's but the PHI defense also giving up a little more lately. If PHI dictates and stays true to form at home like they've been doing most of the season and discarding some of both team's recent play, this doesn't get out of the 180's. I just can't pull the trigger on this though. I wish you luck and will be rooting for this to go under!
After further review, I think there I great value with the Lakers game under..........I personally thought the total should have been 205.............have a steady line with alot of OVER action............just something to look at....
0
After further review, I think there I great value with the Lakers game under..........I personally thought the total should have been 205.............have a steady line with alot of OVER action............just something to look at....
After further review, I think there I great value with the Lakers game under..........I personally thought the total should have been 205.............have a steady line with alot of OVER action............just something to look at....
Let us know Bruce...seems to be a lot of interest on the under in that game...looks like it's moving back up
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bruuuuce78:
After further review, I think there I great value with the Lakers game under..........I personally thought the total should have been 205.............have a steady line with alot of OVER action............just something to look at....
Let us know Bruce...seems to be a lot of interest on the under in that game...looks like it's moving back up
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.