Not been a playoff of UNDERS. Not sure if todays game will change anything but my gut feeling is the Pacers are going to have to up the pace to outlast the Celtics, who are the #2 scoring team in the NBA. It had been that the last 8 out of 10 these two teams played saw Boston score 115 or more. Now, after having backed that trend at 114.5 and seeing it falter by a mere half point, I am going back to the well for a feat that has been achieved 8 out of the past 11. Which is:
BOSTON FG TEAM TOTAL OVER 115
Not making it a big play as much as I think this hits only because I'd like to at least be .500 or over before laying them. Regardless, confident this hits. As always, tail or fade, good luck to all...
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
YTD (NBA PLAYOFFS): 2-3 ATS
Not been a playoff of UNDERS. Not sure if todays game will change anything but my gut feeling is the Pacers are going to have to up the pace to outlast the Celtics, who are the #2 scoring team in the NBA. It had been that the last 8 out of 10 these two teams played saw Boston score 115 or more. Now, after having backed that trend at 114.5 and seeing it falter by a mere half point, I am going back to the well for a feat that has been achieved 8 out of the past 11. Which is:
BOSTON FG TEAM TOTAL OVER 115
Not making it a big play as much as I think this hits only because I'd like to at least be .500 or over before laying them. Regardless, confident this hits. As always, tail or fade, good luck to all...
lagame after one of the regulars here called him out for cheating on his record again: "I can start posting NBA playoffs and challenge you!"
How's that challenge going? 2-4, 0-1 on BIG BETS, after another double digit loss last night.
If he won last night he wouldn't be at .500 like he claimed. One of his losses was another of his BIG PLAY losses, so while he would try to claim he's 3-3 he's trying to hide the fact that one of the losses was a big play, which means his losses are greater than a standard 3-3. When he has a rare win with one of his BIG PLAYS he separates it from his other record, "I was 1-0 on my BIG PLAY last night!" When he loses them he lumps it in with his other losses ("I'm 2-3") and hopes no one remembers the BIG PLAY loss.
He was 25-30, 45% in basketball for the year, and even worse, 6-10 on his BIG plays, 37%, not even close to the fake winning record he gave at the end of the regular season.
Same thing with fake football records he posts. He had a Sunday where he went 0-4 and didn't add any of the losses to his record. When posters called him out on it he ignored them. When they persisted and he knew they wouldn't go away he replied:
"Those four picks I posted I got from someone else so I'm not going to count them on my record!"
It's easy to say "I've had eight winning NFL seasons here in a row!' with accounting (and no integrity) like that.
To find a profitable fade you need someone who hits at 47% or worse. Playoffs, he's now 2-4, 33%, 14 points lower than the baseline needed.
And for his aliases and Fanboyz who want to defend him and say 2-4 is a small sample, BIG PLAYS on the year he's 6-11, 35%, making him a valuable 65% fade.
There is no defending this:
There's a reason he's been called out for cheating on his record more times by more different posters than anyone else at covers.
Caveat emptor.
I always wave back at the little Amazon guy. I feel like it's the courteous thing to do.
5
lagame after one of the regulars here called him out for cheating on his record again: "I can start posting NBA playoffs and challenge you!"
How's that challenge going? 2-4, 0-1 on BIG BETS, after another double digit loss last night.
If he won last night he wouldn't be at .500 like he claimed. One of his losses was another of his BIG PLAY losses, so while he would try to claim he's 3-3 he's trying to hide the fact that one of the losses was a big play, which means his losses are greater than a standard 3-3. When he has a rare win with one of his BIG PLAYS he separates it from his other record, "I was 1-0 on my BIG PLAY last night!" When he loses them he lumps it in with his other losses ("I'm 2-3") and hopes no one remembers the BIG PLAY loss.
He was 25-30, 45% in basketball for the year, and even worse, 6-10 on his BIG plays, 37%, not even close to the fake winning record he gave at the end of the regular season.
Same thing with fake football records he posts. He had a Sunday where he went 0-4 and didn't add any of the losses to his record. When posters called him out on it he ignored them. When they persisted and he knew they wouldn't go away he replied:
"Those four picks I posted I got from someone else so I'm not going to count them on my record!"
It's easy to say "I've had eight winning NFL seasons here in a row!' with accounting (and no integrity) like that.
To find a profitable fade you need someone who hits at 47% or worse. Playoffs, he's now 2-4, 33%, 14 points lower than the baseline needed.
And for his aliases and Fanboyz who want to defend him and say 2-4 is a small sample, BIG PLAYS on the year he's 6-11, 35%, making him a valuable 65% fade.
There is no defending this:
There's a reason he's been called out for cheating on his record more times by more different posters than anyone else at covers.
lagame after one of the regulars here called him out for cheating on his record again: "I can start posting NBA playoffs and challenge you!" How's that challenge going? 2-4, 0-1 on BIG BETS, after another double digit loss last night. If he won last night he wouldn't be at .500 like he claimed. One of his losses was another of his BIG PLAY losses, so while he would try to claim he's 3-3 he's trying to hide the fact that one of the losses was a big play, which means his losses are greater than a standard 3-3. When he has a rare win with one of his BIG PLAYS he separates it from his other record, "I was 1-0 on my BIG PLAY last night!" When he loses them he lumps it in with his other losses ("I'm 2-3") and hopes no one remembers the BIG PLAY loss. He was 25-30, 45% in basketball for the year, and even worse, 6-10 on his BIG plays, 37%, not even close to the fake winning record he gave at the end of the regular season. Same thing with fake football records he posts. He had a Sunday where he went 0-4 and didn't add any of the losses to his record. When posters called him out on it he ignored them. When they persisted and he knew they wouldn't go away he replied: "Those four picks I posted I got from someone else so I'm not going to count them on my record!" It's easy to say "I've had eight winning NFL seasons here in a row!' with accounting (and no integrity) like that. To find a profitable fade you need someone who hits at 47% or worse. Playoffs, he's now 2-4, 33%, 14 points lower than the baseline needed. And for his aliases and Fanboyz who want to defend him and say 2-4 is a small sample, BIG PLAYS on the year he's 6-11, 35%, making him a valuable 65% fade. There is no defending this: There's a reason he's been called out for cheating on his record more times by more different posters than anyone else at covers. Caveat emptor.
Sooo much more!!!! Lots of clowns on this site, hard to find people that dont Bullshit these days.
Be Honest, Keep a Clean record, and lets make some MONEY!
0
Quote Originally Posted by VeritasAlways:
lagame after one of the regulars here called him out for cheating on his record again: "I can start posting NBA playoffs and challenge you!" How's that challenge going? 2-4, 0-1 on BIG BETS, after another double digit loss last night. If he won last night he wouldn't be at .500 like he claimed. One of his losses was another of his BIG PLAY losses, so while he would try to claim he's 3-3 he's trying to hide the fact that one of the losses was a big play, which means his losses are greater than a standard 3-3. When he has a rare win with one of his BIG PLAYS he separates it from his other record, "I was 1-0 on my BIG PLAY last night!" When he loses them he lumps it in with his other losses ("I'm 2-3") and hopes no one remembers the BIG PLAY loss. He was 25-30, 45% in basketball for the year, and even worse, 6-10 on his BIG plays, 37%, not even close to the fake winning record he gave at the end of the regular season. Same thing with fake football records he posts. He had a Sunday where he went 0-4 and didn't add any of the losses to his record. When posters called him out on it he ignored them. When they persisted and he knew they wouldn't go away he replied: "Those four picks I posted I got from someone else so I'm not going to count them on my record!" It's easy to say "I've had eight winning NFL seasons here in a row!' with accounting (and no integrity) like that. To find a profitable fade you need someone who hits at 47% or worse. Playoffs, he's now 2-4, 33%, 14 points lower than the baseline needed. And for his aliases and Fanboyz who want to defend him and say 2-4 is a small sample, BIG PLAYS on the year he's 6-11, 35%, making him a valuable 65% fade. There is no defending this: There's a reason he's been called out for cheating on his record more times by more different posters than anyone else at covers. Caveat emptor.
Sooo much more!!!! Lots of clowns on this site, hard to find people that dont Bullshit these days.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
