The magic have been in disarray since coming back from London. Skiles is a defensive coach and his group has not been responding that way. In the last game he change the starting line-up and took Frye and Fournier out and things didn't get better. That was Friday and all weekend the local radio has been blasting the team for lack of effort. I watch them lot and they tend to have problemswith teams that have good guards. Kemba destroyed them. in the last game. Memphis doesn't have that type of game. So I expect to see a slow game here.
Regarding the line when I see occurrences like this I tend to go with the books. last game the line was set at 204 and they got to 197 so now the books adjust to 192 but that is an over adjustment. I will be on the under.
Sorry for being so long
0
The magic have been in disarray since coming back from London. Skiles is a defensive coach and his group has not been responding that way. In the last game he change the starting line-up and took Frye and Fournier out and things didn't get better. That was Friday and all weekend the local radio has been blasting the team for lack of effort. I watch them lot and they tend to have problemswith teams that have good guards. Kemba destroyed them. in the last game. Memphis doesn't have that type of game. So I expect to see a slow game here.
Regarding the line when I see occurrences like this I tend to go with the books. last game the line was set at 204 and they got to 197 so now the books adjust to 192 but that is an over adjustment. I will be on the under.
hi under, this is very intriguing as I am primarily a Totals bettor and my radar was going crazy last Grizz game when they were at Minny a couple nights ago and total was set at 192, I was like wth! last time Grizz played Minny earlier in the season the total was 192.5 and they scored 220 combined, way over. Now add to that fact that Minny was currently on a run of 6 games over that total AND so were Grizz, so why on Earth would the lines makers put such what I consider a low total of 192 on teams that are flying over that number and flew over that number when they played before? Well after a lackluster 1st qtr that was dead under until last 2 min in 1st qtr really, they blew up and scored 207 and that under was in the rearview the whole time. So for me one of 2 things are happening: either the lines makers expect some sort of regression or Grizz defense to click in OR the lines makers are just not catching up to these higher scoring games with Grizz. Now you've got pretty much the same scenario as a 192 total tonight yet both these teams are on over runs and have passed this number against each other in the past, head scratcher for sure. I'd love to pound the Under but in this league at this moment I hesitate. At some point, maybe tonight, these Grizz games will start going well under this total as I don't think the Man is that far off that long. GL
All Out
0
hi under, this is very intriguing as I am primarily a Totals bettor and my radar was going crazy last Grizz game when they were at Minny a couple nights ago and total was set at 192, I was like wth! last time Grizz played Minny earlier in the season the total was 192.5 and they scored 220 combined, way over. Now add to that fact that Minny was currently on a run of 6 games over that total AND so were Grizz, so why on Earth would the lines makers put such what I consider a low total of 192 on teams that are flying over that number and flew over that number when they played before? Well after a lackluster 1st qtr that was dead under until last 2 min in 1st qtr really, they blew up and scored 207 and that under was in the rearview the whole time. So for me one of 2 things are happening: either the lines makers expect some sort of regression or Grizz defense to click in OR the lines makers are just not catching up to these higher scoring games with Grizz. Now you've got pretty much the same scenario as a 192 total tonight yet both these teams are on over runs and have passed this number against each other in the past, head scratcher for sure. I'd love to pound the Under but in this league at this moment I hesitate. At some point, maybe tonight, these Grizz games will start going well under this total as I don't think the Man is that far off that long. GL
190 really low. I'm sure people will be hammering the over. Looking at the numbers from the past games, scared to play the under, but scared money won't make money. I'm on Orlando +5.5 and will probably parlay it with the under. GL SAC.
0
190 really low. I'm sure people will be hammering the over. Looking at the numbers from the past games, scared to play the under, but scared money won't make money. I'm on Orlando +5.5 and will probably parlay it with the under. GL SAC.
I wouldn't have gone for it at 193, but I took the over when it dropped down to 190.5. Memphis has broken 100 in their last 5 games and Orlando has not been playing up to the level they are capable of recently. Although the total has gone under in 8 of Orlando's last 12 games and under in 4 of their last 5 road games. I think 190 is too good to pass up though.
0
I wouldn't have gone for it at 193, but I took the over when it dropped down to 190.5. Memphis has broken 100 in their last 5 games and Orlando has not been playing up to the level they are capable of recently. Although the total has gone under in 8 of Orlando's last 12 games and under in 4 of their last 5 road games. I think 190 is too good to pass up though.
Last night, Bos@ Phil, Bos had gone over 5 straight overall, and 5 straight on the road, and I took the under and somehow it did stay under by 1 pt. thanks to some pathetic shooting by both teams the last 2 min. or so, and also that it was a blowout game that had Boston apparently dribbling out the clock last 20 seconds. Anyway, 5-0 or 0-5 numbers for or against ( totals and ATS) and playing against those figures have been profitable no matter the team or situation. 190 is really low for sure, but I'm going to risk it.
0
Last night, Bos@ Phil, Bos had gone over 5 straight overall, and 5 straight on the road, and I took the under and somehow it did stay under by 1 pt. thanks to some pathetic shooting by both teams the last 2 min. or so, and also that it was a blowout game that had Boston apparently dribbling out the clock last 20 seconds. Anyway, 5-0 or 0-5 numbers for or against ( totals and ATS) and playing against those figures have been profitable no matter the team or situation. 190 is really low for sure, but I'm going to risk it.
That number is very solid at 190 now. My book has it 190.5 but most books have been sneaking it out a half point and getting it bet back to the 190.
Books haven't had a handle on Grizz scores of late with most of those 7 straight overs being comfortably over. So why do they go one of their lowest numbers yet? Beats me but it's one of those situations where it's pretty much an automatic bet for me.
I'm on Under 190.5 @ $1.90
0
That number is very solid at 190 now. My book has it 190.5 but most books have been sneaking it out a half point and getting it bet back to the 190.
Books haven't had a handle on Grizz scores of late with most of those 7 straight overs being comfortably over. So why do they go one of their lowest numbers yet? Beats me but it's one of those situations where it's pretty much an automatic bet for me.
???????? you idiots actually type shit and try to cap a game??? Go under????? ?????????? younwonder why you lose? Its not cause u are terrible cappers, u have a gambling addiction.... Thats why u lose
0
???????? you idiots actually type shit and try to cap a game??? Go under????? ?????????? younwonder why you lose? Its not cause u are terrible cappers, u have a gambling addiction.... Thats why u lose
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
but is this a setup for the over or do early betters really like the under that much?
Hot Forum Topics
