All Forums | NBA Betting

Personal Guarantee of Profit and 65+% accuracy if using my picks

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13446
Posts: 121
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #51
LOL good job
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 890
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by pinballwizard:

Just caught sight of this thread and can vouch for TheBrownMamba as far as NBA picks go. TBM was one of the gents I followed faithfully over the past couple of years, on and off, and can honestly say he picks far more winners than he does losers. I'm looking forward to tagging along for this current ride. Bol TBM.   

you are good enough
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #53

6-6 50% -$300

If I told you, you wouldnt believe me. But I'll tell you anyway.

Last night I took;  2H PACERS +1.5 , 2H HORNETS +9.5, 2H GRIZZLIES -8 for the usual amount, all unposted *shakes my head*

I will still keep my promise and be 65% on posted plays

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #54

With that said, Im going with

HAWKS +5   500/450

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 195
Posted: #55
65% long-term isn't possible. unless it's losers.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 557
Posted: #56
I would be happy to hit 55% which I am close to doing on my own picks.  Liking the Bucks tonite in NBA.  Got it early at -1.5 and LAC o209.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #57

Quote Originally Posted by vicshap:

65% long-term isn't possible. unless it's losers.

If someone is doing 65% losers, let alone 55% losers, they shouldnt be betting. I've been hitting 65% in the past few years. So your philosophy is, one hits 65% for 5+ years, they're suppose to hit 35-40% for the next 5+ yrs to balance themselves out?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 890
Posted: #58
Los Angeles  19-17 away @ Dallas  PK 24-12 home.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 7902
Posted: #59
I believe 65% is possible to maintain over a season absolutely.  It is extremely difficult and yes most are happy....very happy with even 55% but that does not mean its impossible.  It also depends on how many games your betting.  Its really more about units, than percentages.  More games at 55% can be much more profitable than less games at 65%. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 646
Posted: #60
Good luck tonight on Atlanta  Same side bro, lets get this.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #61

Quote Originally Posted by St2ee:

I believe 65% is possible to maintain over a season absolutely.  It is extremely difficult and yes most are happy....very happy with even 55% but that does not mean its impossible.  It also depends on how many games your betting.  Its really more about units, than percentages.  More games at 55% can be much more profitable than less games at 65%. 

Always about money management

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #62

Quote Originally Posted by RememberMyName:

Good luck tonight on Atlanta  Same side bro, lets get this.

RememberMyName  BOL

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #63

Quote Originally Posted by Blue-bird:

Los Angeles  19-17 away @ Dallas  PK 24-12 home.

and Mavs are looking to get in. Will keep that in mind. Thanks

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 195
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by TheBrownMamba:

If someone is doing 65% losers, let alone 55% losers, they shouldnt be betting. I've been hitting 65% in the past few years. So your philosophy is, one hits 65% for 5+ years, they're suppose to hit 35-40% for the next 5+ yrs to balance themselves out?

65% in the past few years?! you sound like just about every tout out there. so far you're 6-7 posted.  to me, a minimum of 50 plays or more is long-term.  you'd have to go 26-11 to hit 64% by the 50th play. let's see you do it. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 195
Posted: #65
listen, this is nothing personal. i honestly hate to read these threads, because they're so unrealistic. the egos in this racket never cease to amaze me. you honestly think you can go 65-35 every hundred plays? for 3 years?! don't embarrass yourself, lower your expectations.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #66

Quote Originally Posted by vicshap:

listen, this is nothing personal. i honestly hate to read these threads, because they're so unrealistic. the egos in this racket never cease to amaze me. you honestly think you can go 65-35 every hundred plays? for 3 years?! don't embarrass yourself, lower your expectations.

I did state from the beginning Im welcoming positive comments and thoughts on games. If you hate reading these kinds of threads, then simply dont. And not only are you reading them, you decide to throw in your two cents that are absolutely useless to me. I am 6-7, so the f- what? I know what I've done, I know what Im capable of and I know what I've made. Im not here to get your approval. I think your taking your avatar a little to serious, and you think you really are Brian Griffin. If you think you can "educate" me, you and I should pick games for 50 games and see who's educating who.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 11527
Posted: #67

Quote Originally Posted by vicshap:

listen, this is nothing personal. i honestly hate to read these threads, because they're so unrealistic. the egos in this racket never cease to amaze me. you honestly think you can go 65-35 every hundred plays? for 3 years?! don't embarrass yourself, lower your expectations.

I can't for the life of me understand how, with the current price of gas, how you're able to keep your motor-mouth going? Give it a rest, your mouth will appreciate you for it!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 195
Posted: #68
Quote Originally Posted by TheBrownMamba:

I did state from the beginning Im welcoming positive comments and thoughts on games. If you hate reading these kinds of threads, then simply dont. And not only are you reading them, you decide to throw in your two cents that are absolutely useless to me. I am 6-7, so the f- what? I know what I've done, I know what Im capable of and I know what I've made. Im not here to get your approval. I think your taking your avatar a little to serious, and you think you really are Brian Griffin. If you think you can "educate" me, you and I should pick games for 50 games and see who's educating who.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 88
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by TheBrownMamba:

I did state from the beginning Im welcoming positive comments and thoughts on games. If you hate reading these kinds of threads, then simply dont. And not only are you reading them, you decide to throw in your two cents that are absolutely useless to me. I am 6-7, so the f- what? I know what I've done, I know what Im capable of and I know what I've made.

I see ... so you are welcoming free blowj0bs, but cant take critisism? It is true that you know who you are, but the thing is most of readers don`t and it is just not polite to start promising guaranteed moon, stars and the sun if your credibility is zero. Do you understand that? First prove your ability to pick the games and after then start to talk about guarantees ... thats how grown up cappers behave.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by Slipperyslope:

I see ... so you are welcoming free blowj0bs, but cant take critisism? It is true that you know who you are, but the thing is most of readers don`t and it is just not polite to start promising guaranteed moon, stars and the sun if your credibility is zero. Do you understand that? First prove your ability to pick the games and after then start to talk about guarantees ... thats how grown up cappers behave.

Cool and understood. What needs to be said is, a lot of people on here are just waiting for someone to start losing to open their mouths. Thats their main objective and reason for being on this site. I've seen it on here for years. When themselves cant even pick the same two socks at home. CritiCism in this case should come from those who can be better at or equally match the person they are criticizing.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 88
Posted: #71
Quote Originally Posted by TheBrownMamba:

Cool and understood. What needs to be said is, a lot of people on here are just waiting for someone to start losing to open their mouths. Thats their main objective and reason for being on this site. I've seen it on here for years. When themselves cant even pick the same two socks at home. CritiCism in this case should come from those who can be better at or equally match the person they are criticizing.



I agree, but that`s a different story. 6-7 means nothing to me ... as would 2-11 or 11-2. Too small of a sample size. Get to 3 digits with your wins and losses and then we will see ...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 927
Posted: #72
thanks i followed your first 7 picks j/j i would never do that
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #73

Was going to post my picks at 2pm Pacific Time but was waiting on the applause to die down from ROCKETS713's comment

WIZARDS +2 -120   500/416

CELTICS +9.5     500/450

NETS -8.5    500/450

T'WOLVES -11     500/450

PISTONS +6.6     500/450

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 195
Posted: #74
good luck mamba, the 65% man.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 1266
Posted: #75
SPURS -8 500/450
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.