80% of my super sdql trends with hundreds games behind proven year after year for nice overall 56-60% real profit
for five consecutive seasons are broken last two seasons. I quit last
season in december with around 50% win rate cause I smell something
fishy in almost all of my systems. This garbage was really new to me
since I discover these amazing trends. This ridiculous three point
shooting with no defense... hundreds of field goal attempts per game and
crappy tanking since game 1 ruin the whole perspective in the league.
The Warriors are the only team that cover systematically games with some
"new" trends aspects like assists, assist to turnover ratio and basket
assisted percentage. The other teams are complete garbage that want to
copy their game. You need to find a way to broke that style because you
just can't copy the best... you will be forever behind them. I wonder
what new angles we need to research to find good trends that will work
as long as everybody want to be the "new Warriors"
Just see that:
Teams with 35 or more three point attempts last seasons games.
2007 - 16 2008 - 14 2009 - 17 2010 - 14 2011 - 17 2012 - 41 2013 - 54 2014 - 93 (almost double to previous season results) 2015 - 177 (almost double to previous season results) 2016 - 333 (almost double to previous season results) 2017 - 514 (almost double to previous season results) 2018 - ???
2007-2012 were the golden ages for betting on NBA. The game was more predictable. Since then... every season change the game so fast so you just can't adjust and find good angles. Teams in games with 95 or more field goal attempts in 2011 were 71... last season 278
Come on fellas. Let's see if this topic will bring some sdql experts or even beginners to discuss what angles we need to research for this season or we just need to stay away for a while and wait this progression to stop and become something normal so we can find some proven queries which will actually work for the next seasons. The game just makes big steps in new direction and I'm not sure there is hidden profit above the table right now.
Sorry for the English. Last months I didn't practice it at all.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
80% of my super sdql trends with hundreds games behind proven year after year for nice overall 56-60% real profit
for five consecutive seasons are broken last two seasons. I quit last
season in december with around 50% win rate cause I smell something
fishy in almost all of my systems. This garbage was really new to me
since I discover these amazing trends. This ridiculous three point
shooting with no defense... hundreds of field goal attempts per game and
crappy tanking since game 1 ruin the whole perspective in the league.
The Warriors are the only team that cover systematically games with some
"new" trends aspects like assists, assist to turnover ratio and basket
assisted percentage. The other teams are complete garbage that want to
copy their game. You need to find a way to broke that style because you
just can't copy the best... you will be forever behind them. I wonder
what new angles we need to research to find good trends that will work
as long as everybody want to be the "new Warriors"
Just see that:
Teams with 35 or more three point attempts last seasons games.
2007 - 16 2008 - 14 2009 - 17 2010 - 14 2011 - 17 2012 - 41 2013 - 54 2014 - 93 (almost double to previous season results) 2015 - 177 (almost double to previous season results) 2016 - 333 (almost double to previous season results) 2017 - 514 (almost double to previous season results) 2018 - ???
2007-2012 were the golden ages for betting on NBA. The game was more predictable. Since then... every season change the game so fast so you just can't adjust and find good angles. Teams in games with 95 or more field goal attempts in 2011 were 71... last season 278
Come on fellas. Let's see if this topic will bring some sdql experts or even beginners to discuss what angles we need to research for this season or we just need to stay away for a while and wait this progression to stop and become something normal so we can find some proven queries which will actually work for the next seasons. The game just makes big steps in new direction and I'm not sure there is hidden profit above the table right now.
Sorry for the English. Last months I didn't practice it at all.
Good to see you back. I assume you means games with 35+ 3pt attempts in the table above.
I
only started this a few yrs ago so its all i know and like most ppl i
just do some light research and generally lose a few dollars lol. messed
around with sdql in this and mlb but never found much.
Think only going back to 2016 or 2015 at the latest makes sense. THis was the biggest change.
Some teams are making this # skewed of course (Houston did this all 82 games last year, nets only ~42).
The Lakers this year are bucking the trend and hitting the paint.
I would think rest/schedule and momentum are the big factors in the run n shoot kinda game but maybe im missing something.
I dont think you can find many trends that are strong over 2-3 yr time period, but maybe something will develop.
Your English is good. This website is a bad place to practice :)
BOL on your next one
0
Good to see you back. I assume you means games with 35+ 3pt attempts in the table above.
I
only started this a few yrs ago so its all i know and like most ppl i
just do some light research and generally lose a few dollars lol. messed
around with sdql in this and mlb but never found much.
Think only going back to 2016 or 2015 at the latest makes sense. THis was the biggest change.
Some teams are making this # skewed of course (Houston did this all 82 games last year, nets only ~42).
The Lakers this year are bucking the trend and hitting the paint.
I would think rest/schedule and momentum are the big factors in the run n shoot kinda game but maybe im missing something.
I dont think you can find many trends that are strong over 2-3 yr time period, but maybe something will develop.
Your English is good. This website is a bad place to practice :)
they play "well" vs non 3pt shooting teams. seems like just noise at a 100 game sample. used to know how to find the signifigant sample size needed ages ago :) im sure 100 isnt it for this level of variance though
0
they play "well" vs non 3pt shooting teams. seems like just noise at a 100 game sample. used to know how to find the signifigant sample size needed ages ago :) im sure 100 isnt it for this level of variance though
Damn your second post broke the topic. Maybe some administrator could fix this. My overall point was that last year Rockets did it... this year there will be another 2-3 teams and these numbers will increase for sure... and that just ruin many queries with some criteria that are affected by this insane shooting. Overall the league shoot more, prefer very high tempo with no defense... many players play just for stats and are actually very soft. It's poor product with no true competition. Maybe I will focus on my still working queries and will move on from there. Maybe I will focus more on rest indeed.
0
Damn your second post broke the topic. Maybe some administrator could fix this. My overall point was that last year Rockets did it... this year there will be another 2-3 teams and these numbers will increase for sure... and that just ruin many queries with some criteria that are affected by this insane shooting. Overall the league shoot more, prefer very high tempo with no defense... many players play just for stats and are actually very soft. It's poor product with no true competition. Maybe I will focus on my still working queries and will move on from there. Maybe I will focus more on rest indeed.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.