Boy, I what an idiotic theory...
Boy, I what an idiotic theory...
Excuse me. No one is bragging about anything. I'm defending a win when the scum of covers comes in a winning thread and actually try to play it off as a loss.
I said this game would be close innumerable times.
Read my responses and who I'm responding to.
Excuse me. No one is bragging about anything. I'm defending a win when the scum of covers comes in a winning thread and actually try to play it off as a loss.
I said this game would be close innumerable times.
Read my responses and who I'm responding to.
Do you even know when my last posted loss was???
Please give me the date on that one. And then after you do, post all the winning threads in addition...and then shut the fu** up.
See the scum rises to the top on covers even with wins.
If you don't get an ABSOLUTE BLOWOUT WINNER (to quote Steve Stevens, another scumbag) ya got lucky, or, you should be humbled. Even when, it was said time and time and time again, this game would be close.
Yet these same coc*su**ers would be here to say "Another long-winded wasted write-up, all for a loss", if it lost by .5, giving you nothing in terms of how close a loss was.
Ya can't make it up.
Do you even know when my last posted loss was???
Please give me the date on that one. And then after you do, post all the winning threads in addition...and then shut the fu** up.
See the scum rises to the top on covers even with wins.
If you don't get an ABSOLUTE BLOWOUT WINNER (to quote Steve Stevens, another scumbag) ya got lucky, or, you should be humbled. Even when, it was said time and time and time again, this game would be close.
Yet these same coc*su**ers would be here to say "Another long-winded wasted write-up, all for a loss", if it lost by .5, giving you nothing in terms of how close a loss was.
Ya can't make it up.
Lucky. Interesting. I love how you make it look like the Clips were leading by 5 and the Spurs nailed a meaningless three to get within the spread with no time left.
The Spurs lost the game with one second left on a circus shot from a guy's hip and never were outside the 2.5 the entire quarter, a quarter the Spurs lead the overwhelming majority of the time.
This post of course ignores post #25 where I said:
And to say my write-up is invalidated because I post 2.5 points in a nip and tuck series? Please. When books hand you points you take them. If you play a +2.5/3/3.5 and even 4 point spread to get within the number, you will be a failure the overwhelming majority of the time. You better have those games capped to WIN as I do here. I'm just taking what turned into a 2.5 pt line this morning. The books are handing it to me. My hands are out. You make whatever bet you like. |
Do you even know how to cap? (The answer if of course "Fu** no!") Do you really think, in a game with a spread of 2.5, I am going to write-up a game where you actually try to defend getting within 2.5 points?
You cap the game to win and you take the insurance that the public created as they drove this line to close at 3 in some places if it comes down to the last shot which of course it could. And the insurance paid off in a series where goaltending to end games actually decided them.
Now Fu** off.
Lucky. Interesting. I love how you make it look like the Clips were leading by 5 and the Spurs nailed a meaningless three to get within the spread with no time left.
The Spurs lost the game with one second left on a circus shot from a guy's hip and never were outside the 2.5 the entire quarter, a quarter the Spurs lead the overwhelming majority of the time.
This post of course ignores post #25 where I said:
And to say my write-up is invalidated because I post 2.5 points in a nip and tuck series? Please. When books hand you points you take them. If you play a +2.5/3/3.5 and even 4 point spread to get within the number, you will be a failure the overwhelming majority of the time. You better have those games capped to WIN as I do here. I'm just taking what turned into a 2.5 pt line this morning. The books are handing it to me. My hands are out. You make whatever bet you like. |
Do you even know how to cap? (The answer if of course "Fu** no!") Do you really think, in a game with a spread of 2.5, I am going to write-up a game where you actually try to defend getting within 2.5 points?
You cap the game to win and you take the insurance that the public created as they drove this line to close at 3 in some places if it comes down to the last shot which of course it could. And the insurance paid off in a series where goaltending to end games actually decided them.
Now Fu** off.
I don't think you can pound any series line! If he misses game one, how confident are you he will be 100% and playing in game 2? It throws everything off. I would have loved to cap this game one at an opening line of 3ish but now at 6/6.5 with Paul not even out, but 'doubtful' (leaving the door open for another limping Paul to amp up his teammates), I'm left questing too much right now.
I don't think you can pound any series line! If he misses game one, how confident are you he will be 100% and playing in game 2? It throws everything off. I would have loved to cap this game one at an opening line of 3ish but now at 6/6.5 with Paul not even out, but 'doubtful' (leaving the door open for another limping Paul to amp up his teammates), I'm left questing too much right now.
True true, but with Paul 'out', teasing Houston down is the only option at this point for me. I'll just leave the teaser open.
Paul being out for Game 1 makes his performance in Game 7 that much more legendary.
@ Suuma - wow!!! I just checked. A thread on the 2015 Jets! Highly interested. I'll give it a read!
@fade - I'm sure you feel real bad about LC. You're part of the reason he isn't here anymore.
True true, but with Paul 'out', teasing Houston down is the only option at this point for me. I'll just leave the teaser open.
Paul being out for Game 1 makes his performance in Game 7 that much more legendary.
@ Suuma - wow!!! I just checked. A thread on the 2015 Jets! Highly interested. I'll give it a read!
@fade - I'm sure you feel real bad about LC. You're part of the reason he isn't here anymore.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.