Even before the Finals began, dare I say even before playoffs began, Warriors knew they were good. I've never seen a team so confident entering the playoffs.
Warriors are being instructed by the big men upstairs who write script for the National Basketball Association Entertainment Ltd. If Warriors were allowed to play at will we would have experienced a very boring Western Conference playoffs.
Warriors know that they can't lose. Period. They want to win at home. They haven't won a championship in what, 40 years? Great. More the reason they want to lift the trophy in front of their fans.
Apparently Game 4 attracted somewhere around 20 million viewers in US alone - a new record for NBA. This game generated more than $30 million dollars in revenue. Why would Adam Silver wish to miss out on an additional $50 million if the game went to Game 7?
Take Cavs ML. Forget the spread. Don't even think about it. Just take the Cavs
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Even before the Finals began, dare I say even before playoffs began, Warriors knew they were good. I've never seen a team so confident entering the playoffs.
Warriors are being instructed by the big men upstairs who write script for the National Basketball Association Entertainment Ltd. If Warriors were allowed to play at will we would have experienced a very boring Western Conference playoffs.
Warriors know that they can't lose. Period. They want to win at home. They haven't won a championship in what, 40 years? Great. More the reason they want to lift the trophy in front of their fans.
Apparently Game 4 attracted somewhere around 20 million viewers in US alone - a new record for NBA. This game generated more than $30 million dollars in revenue. Why would Adam Silver wish to miss out on an additional $50 million if the game went to Game 7?
Take Cavs ML. Forget the spread. Don't even think about it. Just take the Cavs
So what makes you think Dubs would want to risk a game 7 @ home? FWIW, Cavs don't have anything left in the tank and cannot do anymore adjustments. LBJ who said, he's the best player in the world, cannot do it. This is a team sport and 5 will always beat 1. BOL tho!
0
So what makes you think Dubs would want to risk a game 7 @ home? FWIW, Cavs don't have anything left in the tank and cannot do anymore adjustments. LBJ who said, he's the best player in the world, cannot do it. This is a team sport and 5 will always beat 1. BOL tho!
Interesting, there have been 16 ....65 game winners in NBA history, they span the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's 2000's and 2010's.
These are the best of the best teams, they have the best records and best point margins....................how often to these best teams win a series easily ?
From the 2cd round and beyond when they would play a better team they have swept an opponent just 8 times in 44 series.
That's how difficult it is to sweep an opponent, to believe the league sets that-up, each commisioner over that period would have to set-up the same thing for the same 65 game winners.
Do they pass these things along from commissioner to commissioner ?
And if they do, then do they also pass-on that only 1 series went to 7 games in the finals ?
12 of 13 NBA Final series were 6 games or fewer ..............................
0
Interesting, there have been 16 ....65 game winners in NBA history, they span the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's 2000's and 2010's.
These are the best of the best teams, they have the best records and best point margins....................how often to these best teams win a series easily ?
From the 2cd round and beyond when they would play a better team they have swept an opponent just 8 times in 44 series.
That's how difficult it is to sweep an opponent, to believe the league sets that-up, each commisioner over that period would have to set-up the same thing for the same 65 game winners.
Do they pass these things along from commissioner to commissioner ?
And if they do, then do they also pass-on that only 1 series went to 7 games in the finals ?
12 of 13 NBA Final series were 6 games or fewer ..............................
perhaps the irony of this escapes you....but you go around other peoples threads bagging them out and claiming to fade them and yet you are hands down the greatest fade material here on this site...holy shiit,i cant remember a winner being posted in your previous 7 or 8 attempts!!!...and its all accompanied by the requisite bizarre reasoning of course.
world class loser
0
perhaps the irony of this escapes you....but you go around other peoples threads bagging them out and claiming to fade them and yet you are hands down the greatest fade material here on this site...holy shiit,i cant remember a winner being posted in your previous 7 or 8 attempts!!!...and its all accompanied by the requisite bizarre reasoning of course.
perhaps the irony of this escapes you....but you go around other peoples threads bagging them out and claiming to fade them and yet you are hands down the greatest fade material here on this site...holy shiit,i cant remember a winner being posted in your previous 7 or 8 attempts!!!...and its all accompanied by the requisite bizarre reasoning of course.
world class loser
Kewl story bro! You must be my number 1 fanboy - have you been posting on every thread I make?
Keep going at it!
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
perhaps the irony of this escapes you....but you go around other peoples threads bagging them out and claiming to fade them and yet you are hands down the greatest fade material here on this site...holy shiit,i cant remember a winner being posted in your previous 7 or 8 attempts!!!...and its all accompanied by the requisite bizarre reasoning of course.
world class loser
Kewl story bro! You must be my number 1 fanboy - have you been posting on every thread I make?
Interesting, there have been 16 ....65 game winners in NBA history, they span the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's 2000's and 2010's.
These are the best of the best teams, they have the best records and best point margins....................how often to these best teams win a series easily ?
From the 2cd round and beyond when they would play a better team they have swept an opponent just 8 times in 44 series.
That's how difficult it is to sweep an opponent, to believe the league sets that-up, each commisioner over that period would have to set-up the same thing for the same 65 game winners.
Do they pass these things along from commissioner to commissioner ?
And if they do, then do they also pass-on that only 1 series went to 7 games in the finals ?
12 of 13 NBA Final series were 6 games or fewer ..............................
Oh those naughty commissioners, they continue to pass along the 65 game winners to win the NBA Finals in 6 games or fewer.......................or maybe the 65 game winners representing some of the best teams ever are just to damn good to be taken to a 7th game......just a dumb thought I suppose.......................
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Interesting, there have been 16 ....65 game winners in NBA history, they span the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's 2000's and 2010's.
These are the best of the best teams, they have the best records and best point margins....................how often to these best teams win a series easily ?
From the 2cd round and beyond when they would play a better team they have swept an opponent just 8 times in 44 series.
That's how difficult it is to sweep an opponent, to believe the league sets that-up, each commisioner over that period would have to set-up the same thing for the same 65 game winners.
Do they pass these things along from commissioner to commissioner ?
And if they do, then do they also pass-on that only 1 series went to 7 games in the finals ?
12 of 13 NBA Final series were 6 games or fewer ..............................
Oh those naughty commissioners, they continue to pass along the 65 game winners to win the NBA Finals in 6 games or fewer.......................or maybe the 65 game winners representing some of the best teams ever are just to damn good to be taken to a 7th game......just a dumb thought I suppose.......................
hate to stoop to his level but hes such a piece of shiiiit he just makes it too easy,suuma.......must be one of the worst hypocrites ive seen in my life...pure trash
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Wow, this thread is interesting.
hate to stoop to his level but hes such a piece of shiiiit he just makes it too easy,suuma.......must be one of the worst hypocrites ive seen in my life...pure trash
hate to stoop to his level but hes such a piece of shiiiit he just makes it too easy,suuma.......must be one of the worst hypocrites ive seen in my life...pure trash
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
hate to stoop to his level but hes such a piece of shiiiit he just makes it too easy,suuma.......must be one of the worst hypocrites ive seen in my life...pure trash
"Warriors are being instructed by the big men upstairs who write script for the National Basketball Association Entertainment Ltd. If Warriors were allowed to play at will we would have experienced a very boring Western Conference playoffs. Why would Adam Silver wish to miss out on an additional $50 million if the game went to Game 7?
Take Cavs ML. Forget the spread. Don't even think about it. Just take the Cavs
Maybe that will put an end to your conspiracy theory. Unless Tim Donaghy is on the floor, the game is decided by the players on the court.
0
"Warriors are being instructed by the big men upstairs who write script for the National Basketball Association Entertainment Ltd. If Warriors were allowed to play at will we would have experienced a very boring Western Conference playoffs. Why would Adam Silver wish to miss out on an additional $50 million if the game went to Game 7?
Take Cavs ML. Forget the spread. Don't even think about it. Just take the Cavs
Maybe that will put an end to your conspiracy theory. Unless Tim Donaghy is on the floor, the game is decided by the players on the court.
They did not rig it for cavs to win because the money being bet on the game(Mainly cavs) outweighed the money they would of made for game 7. Either that or they took a small loss so the bettors can't make easy money.
So, vegas paid the NBA tons of money to have GS win in 6
Does my theory hold water? Of course it does! The NBA is professional wrestling!
0
I'll keep the conspiracy alive-
They did not rig it for cavs to win because the money being bet on the game(Mainly cavs) outweighed the money they would of made for game 7. Either that or they took a small loss so the bettors can't make easy money.
So, vegas paid the NBA tons of money to have GS win in 6
Does my theory hold water? Of course it does! The NBA is professional wrestling!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.