Im just a Thunder backer...When I was watching the game, I thought for sure I saw him foul him atleast 3 times. But, when I watched the replay, I realized I was just bitter and James actually played great defense without any contact or a foul. That defense should be taught around the league
0
Im just a Thunder backer...When I was watching the game, I thought for sure I saw him foul him atleast 3 times. But, when I watched the replay, I realized I was just bitter and James actually played great defense without any contact or a foul. That defense should be taught around the league
Im just a Thunder backer...When I was watching the game, I thought for sure I saw him foul him atleast 3 times. But, when I watched the replay, I realized I was just bitter and James actually played great defense without any contact or a foul. That defense should be taught around the league
LMFAO its becuz the superstar always gets the call.. Oh wait KD is a superstar too. Yea imagine if a defender ever hooked lebron and pinned him down on jumper the defender mite get called for flagrant 2. Joke of a league its no coincidence that the 2 most controversial calls of playoffs that decided outcomes of games hav went in heats favor. Wade on rondo and last night
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Im just a Thunder backer...When I was watching the game, I thought for sure I saw him foul him atleast 3 times. But, when I watched the replay, I realized I was just bitter and James actually played great defense without any contact or a foul. That defense should be taught around the league
LMFAO its becuz the superstar always gets the call.. Oh wait KD is a superstar too. Yea imagine if a defender ever hooked lebron and pinned him down on jumper the defender mite get called for flagrant 2. Joke of a league its no coincidence that the 2 most controversial calls of playoffs that decided outcomes of games hav went in heats favor. Wade on rondo and last night
Oh yea and we are lebron haters for sayin he fouled durant
Im the biggest Lebron "hater" on covers I was told.
Even though, I said and continue to say, he is the best in the NBA right now, and the best athlete to ever play in the NBA. But, Im a hater because I bet against the Heat and think they will lose the series
0
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing:
Oh yea and we are lebron haters for sayin he fouled durant
Im the biggest Lebron "hater" on covers I was told.
Even though, I said and continue to say, he is the best in the NBA right now, and the best athlete to ever play in the NBA. But, Im a hater because I bet against the Heat and think they will lose the series
same here i always say how great he is but the fact of the matter is he is not clutch so i guess that makes me a hater. Im not just gona tell lebron fans what they wana hear im gona speak the facts he is great no denying that a total freak, i just cant take the people who believe he can do no wrong and like to blame every1 else when the heat lose. Like last night the lebron fans will say hes clutch when i look at it and see that the heat were up 12 with 8 min to go and he didnt make 1 field goal until the 1.30 mark. even tho it was big shot they dont wana bring up the biggest shot in game which was battiers bank in 3, and now MVP type players are getting clutch credit for hitting 2 FREE throws up 2.
0
same here i always say how great he is but the fact of the matter is he is not clutch so i guess that makes me a hater. Im not just gona tell lebron fans what they wana hear im gona speak the facts he is great no denying that a total freak, i just cant take the people who believe he can do no wrong and like to blame every1 else when the heat lose. Like last night the lebron fans will say hes clutch when i look at it and see that the heat were up 12 with 8 min to go and he didnt make 1 field goal until the 1.30 mark. even tho it was big shot they dont wana bring up the biggest shot in game which was battiers bank in 3, and now MVP type players are getting clutch credit for hitting 2 FREE throws up 2.
Durant fouled out on the offensive foul mins before when he ran over Battier and it was called a blocking foul.
Battier was set and outside the restricted circle.
Durant's ASS shoulda been on the bench.
Keep crying like a little b*tch.
just wrote something similar but hit reset and dont wanna type it again, cuz its to long, but anyone who thinks the refs are on miami is stupid, the refs had the perfect opportunity to give KD his sixth and they would have been without their best and most clutch player for a good portion of the fourth which would have given okc no chance in hell to win, and nobody would have been able to argue cuz it was clearly a charge if they had to call it one way or the other, it was either a no call or charge, the fact it was called a block was absurd.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DickyR:
Who gives a flying f*ckola.
Durant fouled out on the offensive foul mins before when he ran over Battier and it was called a blocking foul.
Battier was set and outside the restricted circle.
Durant's ASS shoulda been on the bench.
Keep crying like a little b*tch.
just wrote something similar but hit reset and dont wanna type it again, cuz its to long, but anyone who thinks the refs are on miami is stupid, the refs had the perfect opportunity to give KD his sixth and they would have been without their best and most clutch player for a good portion of the fourth which would have given okc no chance in hell to win, and nobody would have been able to argue cuz it was clearly a charge if they had to call it one way or the other, it was either a no call or charge, the fact it was called a block was absurd.
Highest ratings in NBA history. This is Ratings gold for Stern. Imagine Thunder breaks Miami's heart in game 2 to come back tie it and then win the game. After how well they all played as a team. That would be devestating for Miami. THen Thunder at the very worst takes 1 in Miami and come back home up 3-2 and can end it in 6. Stern wants this to go the distance. Refs were merely extending series. They couldn't call those fouls on Lebron.
0
Highest ratings in NBA history. This is Ratings gold for Stern. Imagine Thunder breaks Miami's heart in game 2 to come back tie it and then win the game. After how well they all played as a team. That would be devestating for Miami. THen Thunder at the very worst takes 1 in Miami and come back home up 3-2 and can end it in 6. Stern wants this to go the distance. Refs were merely extending series. They couldn't call those fouls on Lebron.
Im the biggest Lebron "hater" on covers I was told.
Even though, I said and continue to say, he is the best in the NBA right now, and the best athlete to ever play in the NBA. But, Im a hater because I bet against the Heat and think they will lose the series
Just because you acknowledge Lebron is a great player doesn't mean you can't hate him. Horrible logic
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Im the biggest Lebron "hater" on covers I was told.
Even though, I said and continue to say, he is the best in the NBA right now, and the best athlete to ever play in the NBA. But, Im a hater because I bet against the Heat and think they will lose the series
Just because you acknowledge Lebron is a great player doesn't mean you can't hate him. Horrible logic
The same few people always bitching about refs after a heat win.....take your loss like a man and stfu. There were missed calls throughout the game on both teams just like every basketball game in the history of the league, but you guys somehow always pinpoint one missed call going the heats way while ignoring any bad calls against the other team. It's the same shit every single game with you guys. Grow up
0
The same few people always bitching about refs after a heat win.....take your loss like a man and stfu. There were missed calls throughout the game on both teams just like every basketball game in the history of the league, but you guys somehow always pinpoint one missed call going the heats way while ignoring any bad calls against the other team. It's the same shit every single game with you guys. Grow up
"for those who keep using the argument that Durant should have been called for a charge earlier... there is a flaw in your argument...
prior to that alleged charge, Westbrook was called for a charge that was very questionable... a couple minutes later, Lebron was not called for a charge that was nearly identical to the call made on Westbrook...
these charging calls go either way, and of the 3 in question, the one that was not called on Lebron was the most textbook definition of a charge, where the player had established position outside of the circle before Lebron was in the air...
the call we are talking about is not questionable... it is not debatable... and it was a call that would have most likely tied up the game and given a strong chance of sending the game into OT, with OKC having siezed the momentum...
you're simply full of shit if you are trying to argue against this... "
0
Posted from another thread....
"for those who keep using the argument that Durant should have been called for a charge earlier... there is a flaw in your argument...
prior to that alleged charge, Westbrook was called for a charge that was very questionable... a couple minutes later, Lebron was not called for a charge that was nearly identical to the call made on Westbrook...
these charging calls go either way, and of the 3 in question, the one that was not called on Lebron was the most textbook definition of a charge, where the player had established position outside of the circle before Lebron was in the air...
the call we are talking about is not questionable... it is not debatable... and it was a call that would have most likely tied up the game and given a strong chance of sending the game into OT, with OKC having siezed the momentum...
you're simply full of shit if you are trying to argue against this... "
good quote there, Pack... i was just about to re-iterate the fact that the charging call can't be compared to a defensive foul on a crucial game-deciding shot...
people arguing that way are clueless!
0
good quote there, Pack... i was just about to re-iterate the fact that the charging call can't be compared to a defensive foul on a crucial game-deciding shot...
He doesn't..... touch him at all during the actual release of the shooting motion. He reached into Durant as he was going up for the shot and it probably was a foul, but he didn't get him at all during the actual shooting motion so it wasn't a super obvious foul. Durant could have made the shot, he didn't get hacked on the wrist or anything. To blame the whole game on that single no-call is ridiculous... the Thunder were down like 7 or 8 with a minute left. It was amazing that they were even down 2 in the spot.
0
He doesn't..... touch him at all during the actual release of the shooting motion. He reached into Durant as he was going up for the shot and it probably was a foul, but he didn't get him at all during the actual shooting motion so it wasn't a super obvious foul. Durant could have made the shot, he didn't get hacked on the wrist or anything. To blame the whole game on that single no-call is ridiculous... the Thunder were down like 7 or 8 with a minute left. It was amazing that they were even down 2 in the spot.
He doesn't..... touch him at all during the actual release of the shooting motion. He reached into Durant as he was going up for the shot and it probably was a foul, but he didn't get him at all during the actual shooting motion so it wasn't a super obvious foul. Durant could have made the shot, he didn't get hacked on the wrist or anything. To blame the whole game on that single no-call is ridiculous... the Thunder were down like 7 or 8 with a minute left. It was amazing that they were even down 2 in the spot.
Ha ha, wow
So, it is ok if he hack and hack a guy while he is going up for a shot, but as long as you dont hit him while he is releasing the shot
A foul is a foul. It doesnt matter when it occurs. He fouled him as he was in the process of taking a shot.
What is wrong with people??? Why is it so hard to admit he was fouled multiple times on the same play??
Who cares if he could have been fouled out prior? Who cares if they were lucky to be in the situation?
Fact of the matter is, KD should have been shooting 2 free throws to tie the game with 10 seconds left.
If you deny that, you have a bigger problem then the people you claim "are crying over the no call"
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stromisle:
He doesn't..... touch him at all during the actual release of the shooting motion. He reached into Durant as he was going up for the shot and it probably was a foul, but he didn't get him at all during the actual shooting motion so it wasn't a super obvious foul. Durant could have made the shot, he didn't get hacked on the wrist or anything. To blame the whole game on that single no-call is ridiculous... the Thunder were down like 7 or 8 with a minute left. It was amazing that they were even down 2 in the spot.
Ha ha, wow
So, it is ok if he hack and hack a guy while he is going up for a shot, but as long as you dont hit him while he is releasing the shot
A foul is a foul. It doesnt matter when it occurs. He fouled him as he was in the process of taking a shot.
What is wrong with people??? Why is it so hard to admit he was fouled multiple times on the same play??
Who cares if he could have been fouled out prior? Who cares if they were lucky to be in the situation?
Fact of the matter is, KD should have been shooting 2 free throws to tie the game with 10 seconds left.
If you deny that, you have a bigger problem then the people you claim "are crying over the no call"
What is wrong with people??? Why is it so hard to admit he was fouled multiple times on the same play??
Who cares if he could have been fouled out prior? Who cares if they were lucky to be in the situation?
Fact of the matter is, KD should have been shooting 2 free throws to tie the game with 10 seconds left.
If you deny that, you have a bigger problem then the people you claim "are crying over the no call"
could not agree more! why do people insist on denying reality just because it doesn't support what they want it to?
you can't even begin to argue that it wasn't a foul without making yourself look like someone who doesn't exist within the realm of reality...
Durant should have been shooting 2 shots to tie the game... that's it! no gray area here... refs ignored an obvious foul at the most crucial moment in the game...
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
What is wrong with people??? Why is it so hard to admit he was fouled multiple times on the same play??
Who cares if he could have been fouled out prior? Who cares if they were lucky to be in the situation?
Fact of the matter is, KD should have been shooting 2 free throws to tie the game with 10 seconds left.
If you deny that, you have a bigger problem then the people you claim "are crying over the no call"
could not agree more! why do people insist on denying reality just because it doesn't support what they want it to?
you can't even begin to argue that it wasn't a foul without making yourself look like someone who doesn't exist within the realm of reality...
Durant should have been shooting 2 shots to tie the game... that's it! no gray area here... refs ignored an obvious foul at the most crucial moment in the game...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.