blame flopping, not the refs. No matter what refs call, people will always question them. Lose, lose situation, everytime
I have no idea what any of that has to do with this game...
In this game, the refs did everything necessary to make sure the Spurs won, and to give them every advantage possible... there was no equity to the officiating, and if there is no equity, then the refs should be questioned...
Just as you think anyone who questions the refs should be dismissed, I think anyone who never questions them should be dismissed...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lethargic_Budah:
blame flopping, not the refs. No matter what refs call, people will always question them. Lose, lose situation, everytime
I have no idea what any of that has to do with this game...
In this game, the refs did everything necessary to make sure the Spurs won, and to give them every advantage possible... there was no equity to the officiating, and if there is no equity, then the refs should be questioned...
Just as you think anyone who questions the refs should be dismissed, I think anyone who never questions them should be dismissed...
Clips shot 1-14 from 3's and missed 40% of their free throw attempts. If they shot just a little better they win, nothing to do with the refs
while this post hits the nail on the head as to why the clips lost, you can't shoot 1/14 from 3 and expect to win a playoff game
I had no wager on the game was just watching a great competitive match. Here are 4 calls that all went against lac that were very questionable:
1. the Barnes tip in the 1st q that was incorrectly ruled basket interference and the 2 pts waved off
2. DJ forced Diaw into a reverse layup in the 4th q in which Diaw missed and DJ's arm barely grazed Diaw's head while going for the shot block, I would say that those type of plays tend to go not whistled more often then a foul is called. very TIC TAC
3. Redick's 5th foul to foul out on a wild Tony Parker out of control drive was a very bad call. It was clear that Parker just threw his body horizontally into Redick to create body contact because Parker knew DJ was behind Redick to block the shot. No way should that foul have been called.
4. the tech on CP that everyone has been mentioning but who knows what he said
obviously the poor shooting lost them the game & there are no excuses in the playoffs but those 4 calls by the refs all had me scratching my head in real time
0
Quote Originally Posted by capdatazz:
Clips shot 1-14 from 3's and missed 40% of their free throw attempts. If they shot just a little better they win, nothing to do with the refs
while this post hits the nail on the head as to why the clips lost, you can't shoot 1/14 from 3 and expect to win a playoff game
I had no wager on the game was just watching a great competitive match. Here are 4 calls that all went against lac that were very questionable:
1. the Barnes tip in the 1st q that was incorrectly ruled basket interference and the 2 pts waved off
2. DJ forced Diaw into a reverse layup in the 4th q in which Diaw missed and DJ's arm barely grazed Diaw's head while going for the shot block, I would say that those type of plays tend to go not whistled more often then a foul is called. very TIC TAC
3. Redick's 5th foul to foul out on a wild Tony Parker out of control drive was a very bad call. It was clear that Parker just threw his body horizontally into Redick to create body contact because Parker knew DJ was behind Redick to block the shot. No way should that foul have been called.
4. the tech on CP that everyone has been mentioning but who knows what he said
obviously the poor shooting lost them the game & there are no excuses in the playoffs but those 4 calls by the refs all had me scratching my head in real time
There were more. Got to count all the Manu flops (at least 3). Some resulted in free throws. How does the guy keep getting away with it? Then the Crawford foul on Parker on the baseline when it was Parker who hooked him. Then the bogus Blake traveling call by Kennedy (another 2 points). The Clippers were robbed once again.
0
There were more. Got to count all the Manu flops (at least 3). Some resulted in free throws. How does the guy keep getting away with it? Then the Crawford foul on Parker on the baseline when it was Parker who hooked him. Then the bogus Blake traveling call by Kennedy (another 2 points). The Clippers were robbed once again.
This is correct! NBA showed its hand in game 5... no way they will allow this series to go 7 games... they worked their fools off to make sure SA won game 5, and the only reason to do that is because they want to push them through to the next round...
I don't bet on the NBA, but to anyone who does, I would advise betting SA in game 6...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Limitlessxp:
This game ends in San antonio tomorrow
This is correct! NBA showed its hand in game 5... no way they will allow this series to go 7 games... they worked their fools off to make sure SA won game 5, and the only reason to do that is because they want to push them through to the next round...
I don't bet on the NBA, but to anyone who does, I would advise betting SA in game 6...
i really thought foster was there to help the clippers but sa got all the 50/50 calls. even my wife who normally doesnt comment or care asked me if the game was fixed.
0
i really thought foster was there to help the clippers but sa got all the 50/50 calls. even my wife who normally doesnt comment or care asked me if the game was fixed.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
