Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: hilarious how the absolute best teams of jordans era were the bird celtics,isiah pistons and kareem/magic lakers and HE COULDNT EVER BEAT ANY OF THEM,NOT ONCE!!!!didnt even come close..........oh no wait,scratch that...after being completely exhausted and depleted from going on deeeeeeep playoff runs 4 years in a row all the way to the finals basically,the pistons finally succumbed to jordans bulls. so then he goes on to pad the resume with wins versus sonics,blazers,jazz and you act like he slayed all before him....if it was switched and that was lebron you would be tearing him a new one for "beating up on the weak" and not being able to get it done until all the great teams had dis-banded or fallen apart. 2011 Dallas Finals. Case closed. Lebrick eliminated from GOAT debate. Deal with it. GOATS don't perform that poorly in a Finals. Sorry guy.
bahahahahaha!!..what are you,12 years old??you dont get to arbitrarily make up your own "rule" out of thin air that disqualifies you from being a highly subjective title-holder (GOAT) and then say "case closed"..you utter,utter co.ck.what are you,skip bayless??
"SoRrY gUy,I mAkE tHe RuLeS aRouNd HeRe"..
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: hilarious how the absolute best teams of jordans era were the bird celtics,isiah pistons and kareem/magic lakers and HE COULDNT EVER BEAT ANY OF THEM,NOT ONCE!!!!didnt even come close..........oh no wait,scratch that...after being completely exhausted and depleted from going on deeeeeeep playoff runs 4 years in a row all the way to the finals basically,the pistons finally succumbed to jordans bulls. so then he goes on to pad the resume with wins versus sonics,blazers,jazz and you act like he slayed all before him....if it was switched and that was lebron you would be tearing him a new one for "beating up on the weak" and not being able to get it done until all the great teams had dis-banded or fallen apart. 2011 Dallas Finals. Case closed. Lebrick eliminated from GOAT debate. Deal with it. GOATS don't perform that poorly in a Finals. Sorry guy.
bahahahahaha!!..what are you,12 years old??you dont get to arbitrarily make up your own "rule" out of thin air that disqualifies you from being a highly subjective title-holder (GOAT) and then say "case closed"..you utter,utter co.ck.what are you,skip bayless??
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: hilarious how the absolute best teams of jordans era were the bird celtics,isiah pistons and kareem/magic lakers and HE COULDNT EVER BEAT ANY OF THEM,NOT ONCE!!!!didnt even come close..........oh no wait,scratch that...after being completely exhausted and depleted from going on deeeeeeep playoff runs 4 years in a row all the way to the finals basically,the pistons finally succumbed to jordans bulls. so then he goes on to pad the resume with wins versus sonics,blazers,jazz and you act like he slayed all before him....if it was switched and that was lebron you would be tearing him a new one for "beating up on the weak" and not being able to get it done until all the great teams had dis-banded or fallen apart. 2011 Dallas Finals. Case closed. Lebrick eliminated from GOAT debate. Deal with it. GOATS don't perform that poorly in a Finals. Sorry guy. bahahahahaha!!..what are you,12 years old??you dont get to arbitrarily make up your own "rule" out of thin air that disqualifies you from being a highly subjective title-holder (GOAT) and then say "case closed"..you utter,utter co.ck.what are you,skip bayless?? "SoRrY gUy,I mAkE tHe RuLeS aRouNd HeRe"..
Imagine calling someone a Co*k for saying MJ is the GOAT, and it's not close because it isn't.
Well maybe it is, but not with Lebrick. Kareem can stake claim in being the GOAT too. Definitely not Lebrick.
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: hilarious how the absolute best teams of jordans era were the bird celtics,isiah pistons and kareem/magic lakers and HE COULDNT EVER BEAT ANY OF THEM,NOT ONCE!!!!didnt even come close..........oh no wait,scratch that...after being completely exhausted and depleted from going on deeeeeeep playoff runs 4 years in a row all the way to the finals basically,the pistons finally succumbed to jordans bulls. so then he goes on to pad the resume with wins versus sonics,blazers,jazz and you act like he slayed all before him....if it was switched and that was lebron you would be tearing him a new one for "beating up on the weak" and not being able to get it done until all the great teams had dis-banded or fallen apart. 2011 Dallas Finals. Case closed. Lebrick eliminated from GOAT debate. Deal with it. GOATS don't perform that poorly in a Finals. Sorry guy. bahahahahaha!!..what are you,12 years old??you dont get to arbitrarily make up your own "rule" out of thin air that disqualifies you from being a highly subjective title-holder (GOAT) and then say "case closed"..you utter,utter co.ck.what are you,skip bayless?? "SoRrY gUy,I mAkE tHe RuLeS aRouNd HeRe"..
Imagine calling someone a Co*k for saying MJ is the GOAT, and it's not close because it isn't.
Well maybe it is, but not with Lebrick. Kareem can stake claim in being the GOAT too. Definitely not Lebrick.
You argument is weak as well. You act like Lebron played in 8 finals with no help. Lebron played with three hall of famers in Miami and likely two others in Cleveland. What on earth are you talking about? During Mike's first 5-6 years he played with no all-stars, and no hall of famers. Scottie wasn't an all star until his 3rd year in the league (he only averaged 16 that year). The very first time Scottie was an all star they took the Pistons seven games and Scottie couldn't play game 7 with a migraine in the Eastern Conference Finals. The very next year they swept the defending two time champs. MJ previously lost to the dynastic Celtics with no all stars, and many considered the 86 Celtics to be maybe the best team of all time during that era. Don't even bring up Lebrick losing to the Warriors 3 times either. After you are in here comparing Trae Young to Steph Curry. That counteracts your whole argument that Lebron faced better teams in the finals. Saying Trae Young is on Stephs level. I know you are young, but you need history lessons boy.[/Quote]
yep,he played with hall of famers in miami..AND HE WON TITLES!!whats your point???and then he had kyrie as ONE hall of famer and i highly,highly doubt that love will be one,you are just making a very bold assumption there that not many would agree with...so he had ONE hof guy and won ANOTHER TITLE against THREE hof guys in a series that he was a big underdog in...then in one other finals kyrie and love were BOTH OUT and in the other finals kyrie had left to boston.....so you are ONCE AGAIN making up pure fantasy to fit you own jordan slurping narrative..he NEVER had both love/kyrie each trip to the finals and he was playing against the BETTER TEAM (according to the books) that had more HOF guys each and every time.and he STILL BEAT THEM on one of those ocassions that he had dudes with him.
but yeah of course he had help...thats not in dispute..the point was always that he has played BETTER TEAMS in almost every single finals he has been in..this is the context that needs to be added to his losses......so you say that jordan couldnt get past teams in his first 6 years cos he had no all-stars (jeez,that sounds like EXCUSE-MAKING TO ME.why didnt he just "make his team better"???),but okay then...lebron in the 2007 finals,2015 finals (kyrie/love injured)and 2018 finals (kyrie gone)had ZERO all-stars with him.but you dont give him a pass.you expect him to "make his team better" and overcome a squad with far superior talent.why is this???jordan couldnt even get past the first fuggin round when he had no help but you crucify lebron for not winning a fuggin title...........very strange indeed.
here,take some time to really look hard and concentrate..get your mummy to help out if she can...read slowly and carefully 3 or 4 or 5 times if it helps..at the top of the fuccing screen read the words of the thread title out loud to yourself and try and understand them,dum-dum.............are you doing it???do you understand yet??is it fuccing sinking in??AT THE SAME AGE!!!AT THE SAME FUGGIN AGE!!!!thats the title you complete dunce..nobody on the planet is saying trae is/will be a better player than peak curry..nobody..not once..ever.is that what you think is going on here?
and i will bet you any sum of money you like that you are not older than me...but hey,its the interwebz where you can make up any damn lie you like and not be held accountable..as proven by every comment you make.
0
@DeezyAZ81
You argument is weak as well. You act like Lebron played in 8 finals with no help. Lebron played with three hall of famers in Miami and likely two others in Cleveland. What on earth are you talking about? During Mike's first 5-6 years he played with no all-stars, and no hall of famers. Scottie wasn't an all star until his 3rd year in the league (he only averaged 16 that year). The very first time Scottie was an all star they took the Pistons seven games and Scottie couldn't play game 7 with a migraine in the Eastern Conference Finals. The very next year they swept the defending two time champs. MJ previously lost to the dynastic Celtics with no all stars, and many considered the 86 Celtics to be maybe the best team of all time during that era. Don't even bring up Lebrick losing to the Warriors 3 times either. After you are in here comparing Trae Young to Steph Curry. That counteracts your whole argument that Lebron faced better teams in the finals. Saying Trae Young is on Stephs level. I know you are young, but you need history lessons boy.[/Quote]
yep,he played with hall of famers in miami..AND HE WON TITLES!!whats your point???and then he had kyrie as ONE hall of famer and i highly,highly doubt that love will be one,you are just making a very bold assumption there that not many would agree with...so he had ONE hof guy and won ANOTHER TITLE against THREE hof guys in a series that he was a big underdog in...then in one other finals kyrie and love were BOTH OUT and in the other finals kyrie had left to boston.....so you are ONCE AGAIN making up pure fantasy to fit you own jordan slurping narrative..he NEVER had both love/kyrie each trip to the finals and he was playing against the BETTER TEAM (according to the books) that had more HOF guys each and every time.and he STILL BEAT THEM on one of those ocassions that he had dudes with him.
but yeah of course he had help...thats not in dispute..the point was always that he has played BETTER TEAMS in almost every single finals he has been in..this is the context that needs to be added to his losses......so you say that jordan couldnt get past teams in his first 6 years cos he had no all-stars (jeez,that sounds like EXCUSE-MAKING TO ME.why didnt he just "make his team better"???),but okay then...lebron in the 2007 finals,2015 finals (kyrie/love injured)and 2018 finals (kyrie gone)had ZERO all-stars with him.but you dont give him a pass.you expect him to "make his team better" and overcome a squad with far superior talent.why is this???jordan couldnt even get past the first fuggin round when he had no help but you crucify lebron for not winning a fuggin title...........very strange indeed.
here,take some time to really look hard and concentrate..get your mummy to help out if she can...read slowly and carefully 3 or 4 or 5 times if it helps..at the top of the fuccing screen read the words of the thread title out loud to yourself and try and understand them,dum-dum.............are you doing it???do you understand yet??is it fuccing sinking in??AT THE SAME AGE!!!AT THE SAME FUGGIN AGE!!!!thats the title you complete dunce..nobody on the planet is saying trae is/will be a better player than peak curry..nobody..not once..ever.is that what you think is going on here?
and i will bet you any sum of money you like that you are not older than me...but hey,its the interwebz where you can make up any damn lie you like and not be held accountable..as proven by every comment you make.
Warriors looked pretty energized in getting to 5 straight Finals 2015-2019. I guess they should have just given up after those first 3 appearances because they were just so tired. Imagine saying that and believing it to fit a narrative. MJ Goat! I know it's hard to swallow for you. Not close.
oh fuc.cing hell...they added KEVIN DURANT.you absolute dope..you are just clueless beyond words..you dont think that changes the complexion and make-up of a team,to add the second best player in the league??so that re-set their run and look what happened,it lasted just 2 years and then it all collapsed in the third year,JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER TIME.warriors would have broken down or faded into obscurity if durant had not joined them....ya dont think the 89 pistons could have maybe extended their run if they had added magic or bird that next season???really??of course they would have,they would have shi.t all over jordans bulls like every other great team he faced.
no,its not hard to swallow at all..i literally pointed it out in the very early pages of the last thread i destroyed and dismantled you in...then RE-ITERATED it yesterday once more..but you have the mental capacity of a goldfish so no shock that that has completely passed you by.
you are an infant..to say that its "not even close" when in every single statistical category you can name it LITERALLY IS CLOSE,with either lebron ahead or slightly behind.....but when you are wrong and dumb at the same time the tactic seems to be to just double down and say more and more ridiculous,exaggerated things to try and make yourself feel right.even though you are being thoroughly destroyed in every single comment with facts and logic.....deezy=throw-dem-lies
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Warriors looked pretty energized in getting to 5 straight Finals 2015-2019. I guess they should have just given up after those first 3 appearances because they were just so tired. Imagine saying that and believing it to fit a narrative. MJ Goat! I know it's hard to swallow for you. Not close.
oh fuc.cing hell...they added KEVIN DURANT.you absolute dope..you are just clueless beyond words..you dont think that changes the complexion and make-up of a team,to add the second best player in the league??so that re-set their run and look what happened,it lasted just 2 years and then it all collapsed in the third year,JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER TIME.warriors would have broken down or faded into obscurity if durant had not joined them....ya dont think the 89 pistons could have maybe extended their run if they had added magic or bird that next season???really??of course they would have,they would have shi.t all over jordans bulls like every other great team he faced.
no,its not hard to swallow at all..i literally pointed it out in the very early pages of the last thread i destroyed and dismantled you in...then RE-ITERATED it yesterday once more..but you have the mental capacity of a goldfish so no shock that that has completely passed you by.
you are an infant..to say that its "not even close" when in every single statistical category you can name it LITERALLY IS CLOSE,with either lebron ahead or slightly behind.....but when you are wrong and dumb at the same time the tactic seems to be to just double down and say more and more ridiculous,exaggerated things to try and make yourself feel right.even though you are being thoroughly destroyed in every single comment with facts and logic.....deezy=throw-dem-lies
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: hilarious how the absolute best teams of jordans era were the bird celtics,isiah pistons and kareem/magic lakers and HE COULDNT EVER BEAT ANY OF THEM,NOT ONCE!!!!didnt even come close..........oh no wait,scratch that...after being completely exhausted and depleted from going on deeeeeeep playoff runs 4 years in a row all the way to the finals basically,the pistons finally succumbed to jordans bulls. so then he goes on to pad the resume with wins versus sonics,blazers,jazz and you act like he slayed all before him....if it was switched and that was lebron you would be tearing him a new one for "beating up on the weak" and not being able to get it done until all the great teams had dis-banded or fallen apart. 2011 Dallas Finals. Case closed. Lebrick eliminated from GOAT debate. Deal with it. GOATS don't perform that poorly in a Finals. Sorry guy. bahahahahaha!!..what are you,12 years old??you dont get to arbitrarily make up your own "rule" out of thin air that disqualifies you from being a highly subjective title-holder (GOAT) and then say "case closed"..you utter,utter co.ck.what are you,skip bayless?? "SoRrY gUy,I mAkE tHe RuLeS aRouNd HeRe".. Imagine calling someone a Co*k for saying MJ is the GOAT, and it's not close because it isn't. Well maybe it is, but not with Lebrick. Kareem can stake claim in being the GOAT too. Definitely not Lebrick.
nobody called you a co.ck for saying he is the best..i AGREE WITH THAT so why would that be the case??jeezus you are soooooo dense its damn near impossible to be this thick..i cant understand it...you are a co.ck for FABRICATING YOUR OWN ARBITRARY RULE about what qualifies someone as being able to hold a subjective,made-up title...there ARE NO RULES you dic.k,its an open-ended,subjective discussion.....and if there were rules a loser like you sure as hell wouldnt be making them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: hilarious how the absolute best teams of jordans era were the bird celtics,isiah pistons and kareem/magic lakers and HE COULDNT EVER BEAT ANY OF THEM,NOT ONCE!!!!didnt even come close..........oh no wait,scratch that...after being completely exhausted and depleted from going on deeeeeeep playoff runs 4 years in a row all the way to the finals basically,the pistons finally succumbed to jordans bulls. so then he goes on to pad the resume with wins versus sonics,blazers,jazz and you act like he slayed all before him....if it was switched and that was lebron you would be tearing him a new one for "beating up on the weak" and not being able to get it done until all the great teams had dis-banded or fallen apart. 2011 Dallas Finals. Case closed. Lebrick eliminated from GOAT debate. Deal with it. GOATS don't perform that poorly in a Finals. Sorry guy. bahahahahaha!!..what are you,12 years old??you dont get to arbitrarily make up your own "rule" out of thin air that disqualifies you from being a highly subjective title-holder (GOAT) and then say "case closed"..you utter,utter co.ck.what are you,skip bayless?? "SoRrY gUy,I mAkE tHe RuLeS aRouNd HeRe".. Imagine calling someone a Co*k for saying MJ is the GOAT, and it's not close because it isn't. Well maybe it is, but not with Lebrick. Kareem can stake claim in being the GOAT too. Definitely not Lebrick.
nobody called you a co.ck for saying he is the best..i AGREE WITH THAT so why would that be the case??jeezus you are soooooo dense its damn near impossible to be this thick..i cant understand it...you are a co.ck for FABRICATING YOUR OWN ARBITRARY RULE about what qualifies someone as being able to hold a subjective,made-up title...there ARE NO RULES you dic.k,its an open-ended,subjective discussion.....and if there were rules a loser like you sure as hell wouldnt be making them.
I know you like when former players talk about today's game. Sir Charles sums it up perfectly a few years ago. 1:15 mark. Enjoy! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8ThAIcdscY
yikes...big,big,biiiiggggg fuccin yikes..thats what this has devolved into now??googling the OPINION of a dude who,since retiring,has literally made a living off of being wrong with his basketball takes and opinions...oh deary,deary me..this guy is RENOWNED for being wrong,its his "schtick"..though its hard to tell if its deliberate or not..this guy bet a large sum of money on the feckin blazers to win it all this year....he one of the few guys who you could confidently fade with good money when he says sumthin basketball related.
and it dont matter who the hell it is anyway,he just another guy with an opinion thats as worthless as yours or mine.....though he did get this one correct in my view.
ironically i think it was charles himself that said that opinions are like ar.se-holes....everybody got one and most of em stink.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
I know you like when former players talk about today's game. Sir Charles sums it up perfectly a few years ago. 1:15 mark. Enjoy! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8ThAIcdscY
yikes...big,big,biiiiggggg fuccin yikes..thats what this has devolved into now??googling the OPINION of a dude who,since retiring,has literally made a living off of being wrong with his basketball takes and opinions...oh deary,deary me..this guy is RENOWNED for being wrong,its his "schtick"..though its hard to tell if its deliberate or not..this guy bet a large sum of money on the feckin blazers to win it all this year....he one of the few guys who you could confidently fade with good money when he says sumthin basketball related.
and it dont matter who the hell it is anyway,he just another guy with an opinion thats as worthless as yours or mine.....though he did get this one correct in my view.
ironically i think it was charles himself that said that opinions are like ar.se-holes....everybody got one and most of em stink.
@ melossinglet Are you just this angry all day? Do you just walk around cursing people out on the street??? Check out this compilation of Lebrick from this year. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEaclXl3oFo See if you can find one similar of MJ. I'll wait.
angry??what angry??huh??...im not even slightly angry.....that was weird.do you know me?can you see me?jeez,you might be a weeeeee bit sensitive and taking things too seriously there,little guy..nobody is "angry"...unless of course you are.
ummmm,you are going to wait for me to trawl through 12+ years worth of jordans playing career to find snippets of times when he gave sub-optimal effort??...uh yeah,whilst im absolutely positive that kind of footage exists i can think of waaaay better ways to spend time on this earth...only an emotionally invested loser that is hell-bent on trying to make another man look worse than what he is would go to that trouble(someone like you i dare say?)....every single player that has ever played has had those moments im sure..they are all human and have adverse reactions and emotional responses to things in the heat of the moment.
in a general sense i do agree though,lebrons body language and pouting,throwing mini-tantrums is often times horrible.....but jordan wasnt the perfect exemplary team-mate either..he physically and psychologically abused guys on his team his whole career,punched one in the face and told team-mates not to pass the ball to bill cartwright early in jordans career...so it works both ways,both guys have their faults.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
@ melossinglet Are you just this angry all day? Do you just walk around cursing people out on the street??? Check out this compilation of Lebrick from this year. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEaclXl3oFo See if you can find one similar of MJ. I'll wait.
angry??what angry??huh??...im not even slightly angry.....that was weird.do you know me?can you see me?jeez,you might be a weeeeee bit sensitive and taking things too seriously there,little guy..nobody is "angry"...unless of course you are.
ummmm,you are going to wait for me to trawl through 12+ years worth of jordans playing career to find snippets of times when he gave sub-optimal effort??...uh yeah,whilst im absolutely positive that kind of footage exists i can think of waaaay better ways to spend time on this earth...only an emotionally invested loser that is hell-bent on trying to make another man look worse than what he is would go to that trouble(someone like you i dare say?)....every single player that has ever played has had those moments im sure..they are all human and have adverse reactions and emotional responses to things in the heat of the moment.
in a general sense i do agree though,lebrons body language and pouting,throwing mini-tantrums is often times horrible.....but jordan wasnt the perfect exemplary team-mate either..he physically and psychologically abused guys on his team his whole career,punched one in the face and told team-mates not to pass the ball to bill cartwright early in jordans career...so it works both ways,both guys have their faults.
Steph Curry was better at 18 than Trae is at age 22. What a duma$$ argument from Trae backers. Trae Young gets numbers because he is the only point guard on the roster and doesn't have to share the ball with anyone. He shoots 34% from three for a career, and is shooting 33% from 3 in the playoffs. He is nowhere near as efficient as Steph Curry was at 22 or at any other age. Dudes in here arguing otherwise do not know hoops.
Preach! Someone who understands his hoops. These guys saying Trae Young is better than a 22 year old steph are insane.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:
Steph Curry was better at 18 than Trae is at age 22. What a duma$$ argument from Trae backers. Trae Young gets numbers because he is the only point guard on the roster and doesn't have to share the ball with anyone. He shoots 34% from three for a career, and is shooting 33% from 3 in the playoffs. He is nowhere near as efficient as Steph Curry was at 22 or at any other age. Dudes in here arguing otherwise do not know hoops.
Preach! Someone who understands his hoops. These guys saying Trae Young is better than a 22 year old steph are insane.
Melo is passionate I'll give him that. He's just almost always wrong and most definitely a nut job.
oh man,its tough not to value the opinion of quite possibly the stupidest man on the planet...but i will somehow find a way.
you are completely incapable of communicating and interacting with another adult human being and 85% of the content you have contributed to this thread is outright lies or gross exaggeration.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts:
Melo is passionate I'll give him that. He's just almost always wrong and most definitely a nut job.
oh man,its tough not to value the opinion of quite possibly the stupidest man on the planet...but i will somehow find a way.
you are completely incapable of communicating and interacting with another adult human being and 85% of the content you have contributed to this thread is outright lies or gross exaggeration.
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Steph Curry was better at 18 than Trae is at age 22. What a duma$$ argument from Trae backers. Trae Young gets numbers because he is the only point guard on the roster and doesn't have to share the ball with anyone. He shoots 34% from three for a career, and is shooting 33% from 3 in the playoffs. He is nowhere near as efficient as Steph Curry was at 22 or at any other age. Dudes in here arguing otherwise do not know hoops. Preach! Someone who understands his hoops. These guys saying Trae Young is better than a 22 year old steph are insane.
3 dumb guys all stroking each other off and coming to the same conclusion does not a strong argument make.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts:
Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Steph Curry was better at 18 than Trae is at age 22. What a duma$$ argument from Trae backers. Trae Young gets numbers because he is the only point guard on the roster and doesn't have to share the ball with anyone. He shoots 34% from three for a career, and is shooting 33% from 3 in the playoffs. He is nowhere near as efficient as Steph Curry was at 22 or at any other age. Dudes in here arguing otherwise do not know hoops. Preach! Someone who understands his hoops. These guys saying Trae Young is better than a 22 year old steph are insane.
3 dumb guys all stroking each other off and coming to the same conclusion does not a strong argument make.
though,to be fair,what those 2 stooges do cant really be classified as arguing..its more guzzling the cu.m of their most favourite player and repeating the same inane phrase or cliche repeatedly over dozens and dozens of pages whilst ignoring anything written in refutation....so i stand corrected.maybe it is only me that was trying to argue.
0
though,to be fair,what those 2 stooges do cant really be classified as arguing..its more guzzling the cu.m of their most favourite player and repeating the same inane phrase or cliche repeatedly over dozens and dozens of pages whilst ignoring anything written in refutation....so i stand corrected.maybe it is only me that was trying to argue.
though,to be fair,what those 2 stooges do cant really be classified as arguing..its more guzzling the cu.m of their most favourite player and repeating the same inane phrase or cliche repeatedly over dozens and dozens of pages whilst ignoring anything written in refutation....so i stand corrected.maybe it is only me that was trying to argue.
People who understand basketball understand how difficult it is to play at the efficiency Steph Curry plays at even at the age of 22 on a crap team. He has a unique talent that I was hoping Trae would become, but he just hasn't. A point guard who has the ball in his hands most of the game and takes a ton of shots is nothing new. I have no clue what you think you're watching but it's not better than what Steph Curry could do at 22. He'd be amazing surrounded by the Hawks shooters. But some people just aren't capable of understanding these things.
1
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
though,to be fair,what those 2 stooges do cant really be classified as arguing..its more guzzling the cu.m of their most favourite player and repeating the same inane phrase or cliche repeatedly over dozens and dozens of pages whilst ignoring anything written in refutation....so i stand corrected.maybe it is only me that was trying to argue.
People who understand basketball understand how difficult it is to play at the efficiency Steph Curry plays at even at the age of 22 on a crap team. He has a unique talent that I was hoping Trae would become, but he just hasn't. A point guard who has the ball in his hands most of the game and takes a ton of shots is nothing new. I have no clue what you think you're watching but it's not better than what Steph Curry could do at 22. He'd be amazing surrounded by the Hawks shooters. But some people just aren't capable of understanding these things.
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: though,to be fair,what those 2 stooges do cant really be classified as arguing..its more guzzling the cu.m of their most favourite player and repeating the same inane phrase or cliche repeatedly over dozens and dozens of pages whilst ignoring anything written in refutation....so i stand corrected.maybe it is only me that was trying to argue. People who understand basketball understand how difficult it is to play at the efficiency Steph Curry plays at even at the age of 22 on a crap team. He has a unique talent that I was hoping Trae would become, but he just hasn't. A point guard who has the ball in his hands most of the game and takes a ton of shots is nothing new. I have no clue what you think you're watching but it's not better than what Steph Curry could do at 22. He'd be amazing surrounded by the Hawks shooters. But some people just aren't capable of understanding these things.
dumb guy says what?
0
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts:
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: though,to be fair,what those 2 stooges do cant really be classified as arguing..its more guzzling the cu.m of their most favourite player and repeating the same inane phrase or cliche repeatedly over dozens and dozens of pages whilst ignoring anything written in refutation....so i stand corrected.maybe it is only me that was trying to argue. People who understand basketball understand how difficult it is to play at the efficiency Steph Curry plays at even at the age of 22 on a crap team. He has a unique talent that I was hoping Trae would become, but he just hasn't. A point guard who has the ball in his hands most of the game and takes a ton of shots is nothing new. I have no clue what you think you're watching but it's not better than what Steph Curry could do at 22. He'd be amazing surrounded by the Hawks shooters. But some people just aren't capable of understanding these things.
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: though,to be fair,what those 2 stooges do cant really be classified as arguing..its more guzzling the cu.m of their most favourite player and repeating the same inane phrase or cliche repeatedly over dozens and dozens of pages whilst ignoring anything written in refutation....so i stand corrected.maybe it is only me that was trying to argue. People who understand basketball understand how difficult it is to play at the efficiency Steph Curry plays at even at the age of 22 on a crap team. He has a unique talent that I was hoping Trae would become, but he just hasn't. A point guard who has the ball in his hands most of the game and takes a ton of shots is nothing new. I have no clue what you think you're watching but it's not better than what Steph Curry could do at 22. He'd be amazing surrounded by the Hawks shooters. But some people just aren't capable of understanding these things.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ThrowDemDarts:
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet: though,to be fair,what those 2 stooges do cant really be classified as arguing..its more guzzling the cu.m of their most favourite player and repeating the same inane phrase or cliche repeatedly over dozens and dozens of pages whilst ignoring anything written in refutation....so i stand corrected.maybe it is only me that was trying to argue. People who understand basketball understand how difficult it is to play at the efficiency Steph Curry plays at even at the age of 22 on a crap team. He has a unique talent that I was hoping Trae would become, but he just hasn't. A point guard who has the ball in his hands most of the game and takes a ton of shots is nothing new. I have no clue what you think you're watching but it's not better than what Steph Curry could do at 22. He'd be amazing surrounded by the Hawks shooters. But some people just aren't capable of understanding these things.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.