I realize what I'm going to say will sound extremely dumb and it's no way to handicap games but I want to take the under simply because 218 points is crapload.
They will basically need to score at will throughout the entire game for it to go over. If they have 3 quarters of 50pts and another of 60 the game will still fall under....
Opinions and input is welcomed!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I realize what I'm going to say will sound extremely dumb and it's no way to handicap games but I want to take the under simply because 218 points is crapload.
They will basically need to score at will throughout the entire game for it to go over. If they have 3 quarters of 50pts and another of 60 the game will still fall under....
Farmar back at point guard and no Gasol tonight. Lakers game pace alone whether they hit shots or not against the worst d the NBA has seen in years should give them at least 115 points(I could see the Lakers scoring 125 points easy) Now to get it under 218 Philly could not score much more than 100. Here is the problem with that Gasol plays some D but is out tonight. Kaman is the ultimate over player. He can score in bunches but is right up there as the worst defensive big man in the league. 218 is very high and out of my range that I play but breaking down pace stats defensive ratings and Farmar back in the lineup my rating has this at 227 BEWARE of the under
0
Farmar back at point guard and no Gasol tonight. Lakers game pace alone whether they hit shots or not against the worst d the NBA has seen in years should give them at least 115 points(I could see the Lakers scoring 125 points easy) Now to get it under 218 Philly could not score much more than 100. Here is the problem with that Gasol plays some D but is out tonight. Kaman is the ultimate over player. He can score in bunches but is right up there as the worst defensive big man in the league. 218 is very high and out of my range that I play but breaking down pace stats defensive ratings and Farmar back in the lineup my rating has this at 227 BEWARE of the under
Farmar back at point guard and no Gasol tonight. Lakers game pace alone whether they hit shots or not against the worst d the NBA has seen in years should give them at least 115 points(I could see the Lakers scoring 125 points easy) Now to get it under 218 Philly could not score much more than 100. Here is the problem with that Gasol plays some D but is out tonight. Kaman is the ultimate over player. He can score in bunches but is right up there as the worst defensive big man in the league. 218 is very high and out of my range that I play but breaking down pace stats defensive ratings and Farmar back in the lineup my rating has this at 227 BEWARE of the under
Thanks for the info
0
Quote Originally Posted by YBMoney:
Farmar back at point guard and no Gasol tonight. Lakers game pace alone whether they hit shots or not against the worst d the NBA has seen in years should give them at least 115 points(I could see the Lakers scoring 125 points easy) Now to get it under 218 Philly could not score much more than 100. Here is the problem with that Gasol plays some D but is out tonight. Kaman is the ultimate over player. He can score in bunches but is right up there as the worst defensive big man in the league. 218 is very high and out of my range that I play but breaking down pace stats defensive ratings and Farmar back in the lineup my rating has this at 227 BEWARE of the under
I realize what I'm going to say will sound extremely dumb and it's no way to handicap games but I want to take the under simply because 218 points is crapload.
They will basically need to score at will throughout the entire game for it to go over. If they have 3 quarters of 50pts and another of 60 the game will still fall under....
Opinions and input is welcomed!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigJoe83:
I realize what I'm going to say will sound extremely dumb and it's no way to handicap games but I want to take the under simply because 218 points is crapload.
They will basically need to score at will throughout the entire game for it to go over. If they have 3 quarters of 50pts and another of 60 the game will still fall under....
Under 1H as well. Far too many injuries to think LAL can keep in rhythm. I get that Philly "D" is for shitt...but don't see overs happening on a Sunday night game. Lakers don't have the firepower on the court to get the over, and Phil not going to add enough.
Good luck.
0
Under 1H as well. Far too many injuries to think LAL can keep in rhythm. I get that Philly "D" is for shitt...but don't see overs happening on a Sunday night game. Lakers don't have the firepower on the court to get the over, and Phil not going to add enough.
what's strange is that the line keeps going up even though the public is on the under. Also, I've been watching the pre game show and they keep saying it's going to be a high scoring game. I would go opposite and go under.
0
what's strange is that the line keeps going up even though the public is on the under. Also, I've been watching the pre game show and they keep saying it's going to be a high scoring game. I would go opposite and go under.
I took under 1H and Lakers -4 1H. Jordan Hill gonna hold that paint down tonight. He knows he has the potential to be a key Laker big man going into the future of the franchise, so tonight is a good night for him to prove it.
0
I took under 1H and Lakers -4 1H. Jordan Hill gonna hold that paint down tonight. He knows he has the potential to be a key Laker big man going into the future of the franchise, so tonight is a good night for him to prove it.
Still can't imagine what anyone saw in the overs tonight. Game is (fortunately) playing out as hoped in Q1. On Unders 1H and most likely 2H based on score. Good luck all.
0
Still can't imagine what anyone saw in the overs tonight. Game is (fortunately) playing out as hoped in Q1. On Unders 1H and most likely 2H based on score. Good luck all.
Still can't imagine what anyone saw in the overs tonight. Game is (fortunately) playing out as hoped in Q1. On Unders 1H and most likely 2H based on score. Good luck all.
well its all about opinions and obviously you have yours after the 1st period..moron.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kma_books:
Still can't imagine what anyone saw in the overs tonight. Game is (fortunately) playing out as hoped in Q1. On Unders 1H and most likely 2H based on score. Good luck all.
well its all about opinions and obviously you have yours after the 1st period..moron.
well its all about opinions and obviously you have yours after the 1st period..moron.
LOL. That's awesome mate...especially considering that you live in the UK and it's 0315. Sounds like the jordie or scouser need to focus more on Premiere League and less on NBA.
Suckk it....
[Ticket #: 160219067] STRAIGHT BET
12/29/2013 @ 07:45 PM
NBA
[1810] TOTAL u109½-105 (1H PHILADELPHIA vrs 1H LA LAKERS)
$1000
$952
0
Quote Originally Posted by dirtman1:
well its all about opinions and obviously you have yours after the 1st period..moron.
LOL. That's awesome mate...especially considering that you live in the UK and it's 0315. Sounds like the jordie or scouser need to focus more on Premiere League and less on NBA.
Suckk it....
[Ticket #: 160219067] STRAIGHT BET
12/29/2013 @ 07:45 PM
NBA
[1810] TOTAL u109½-105 (1H PHILADELPHIA vrs 1H LA LAKERS)
LOL. That's awesome mate...especially considering that you live in the UK and it's 0315. Sounds like the jordie or scouser need to focus more on Premiere League and less on NBA.
Suckk it....
[Ticket #: 160219067] STRAIGHT BET
12/29/2013 @ 07:45 PM
NBA
[1810] TOTAL u109½-105 (1H PHILADELPHIA vrs 1H LA LAKERS)
$1000
$952
Its GEORDIE you illeterate fu ck
0
Quote Originally Posted by kma_books:
LOL. That's awesome mate...especially considering that you live in the UK and it's 0315. Sounds like the jordie or scouser need to focus more on Premiere League and less on NBA.
Suckk it....
[Ticket #: 160219067] STRAIGHT BET
12/29/2013 @ 07:45 PM
NBA
[1810] TOTAL u109½-105 (1H PHILADELPHIA vrs 1H LA LAKERS)
well its all about opinions and obviously you have yours after the 1st period..moron.
Where you at mate? I made an assessment after Q1 when it was 20-22 and the 1H unders was easily in control...and you call me a moron?
Bwaaaaaaaaaa. Call me a moron any day you want, and I'll take my cash to the bank. Now run along young lad and get ready to start work at Costa or driving a lorry. Tool.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dirtman1:
well its all about opinions and obviously you have yours after the 1st period..moron.
Where you at mate? I made an assessment after Q1 when it was 20-22 and the 1H unders was easily in control...and you call me a moron?
Bwaaaaaaaaaa. Call me a moron any day you want, and I'll take my cash to the bank. Now run along young lad and get ready to start work at Costa or driving a lorry. Tool.
Despite the very low shooting percentages by both teams. I believe that the second half will be high scoring. Vegas didn't set that high line for nothing. We will see more of what we saw in the 2Q.
Over 109 2H
0
Despite the very low shooting percentages by both teams. I believe that the second half will be high scoring. Vegas didn't set that high line for nothing. We will see more of what we saw in the 2Q.
Hahaha...that's awesome...but nobody cares. Look it up foolio...Geordie is much more common...but Jordie is used quite frequently as well. Get around your country.
Oh yeah.... 1H on my unders. Have any other brilliant thoughts you fuckkin ignorant wanker???
you
0
Quote Originally Posted by dirtman1:
Its GEORDIE you illeterate fu ck
Hahaha...that's awesome...but nobody cares. Look it up foolio...Geordie is much more common...but Jordie is used quite frequently as well. Get around your country.
Oh yeah.... 1H on my unders. Have any other brilliant thoughts you fuckkin ignorant wanker???
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.