All Forums | NBA Betting

WHY DID THEY REMOVE THE LAST 2 POINTS BY TERRY???

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3327
Posts: 34
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 4453
Posted: #26
yulp and u guys say this game isnt fixed? isnt it funny how they will not review it and add two points to the score board but if a team is up by 40 points and there is 11 seconds left with the winning team having the ball they make them walk past the half court and dribbled out the rest of the clock? you really do not need to do both but yet they treat it completely different .  bunch of bull shit that is why i quit betting nba becasue of bull shit like this. i feel bad for whomever got a line of 6.  next time realize which side the zebras and the commissioner are on so you can win some money

can anybody saw san diego vs pittsburgh all over again
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 720
Posted: #27
i seriously doubt they would go to replay in this instance, they may have briefly winked and nodded to each other or something, but doubt they replayed while players were celebrating.... can someone confirm
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 2593
Posted: #28
The NBA is a tough nut to crack...................many times the refs decide the game and not the players    who would watch this garbage w/o coin involved.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 244
Posted: #29
Was a good call. Check youtube video, red light is on and ball is clearly still being touched. If terry would of layed it in it would of counted. but i guess he doesnt care if they win by 4 or 6, he wanted to end it with style points!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5092
Posted: #30

What you always see if someone like Terry dribble out the clock precisely so no one is trying to make an unnecessary basket-and gee why would they try to do that? And who might benefit from that? And who had a ref cheating recently?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 4453
Posted: #31

Quote Originally Posted by neonkion:

i seriously doubt they would go to replay in this instance, they may have briefly winked and nodded to each other or something, but doubt they replayed while players were celebrating.... can someone confirm

 

confirmed that terry slammed it home the ball was inside the basket when it left terry's hand there fore it should count as two points.  regardless of celebration or not that bucket SHOULD STILL COUNT. wouldnt u agree?  now if there was .01 seconds left they make them plahy it? why the team cannot win the game with that little time on it.  isnt it .03 seconds minimum? who knows but somebody was cheating and the ball should have counted it.  too much money not tooo. let see if the commissioner wants miami to win again like they did in 06

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 509
Posted: #32

I posted this 3 days ago where have you all been? - see link below - they clearly got the call RIGHT.  The ESPN clock was off.,.picture shows ball in his hand with time expired

-------------------------------------

ESPN clock was wrong.  Red light on clearly before Terry makes the bucket...

Refs got it right...as this snapshot clearly indicates

https://30fps.mocksession.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/x2011-May-26-0-10-16.jpg.pagespeed.ic.SzF8SYYU3x.jpg

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 4453
Posted: #33
so just becasue the red light goes off that is the correct call? is that what espn said?  just another fool for believing the media. you can clearly see .3 seconds left and the ball inside the rim terry cannot slam the ball with the ball still in his hand inside the rim?  i dont know man but they CLEARLY got this wrong. another bad beat but hey it happens right? i dont want to argue or throw it in other peoples face but just be consistent with the play call. the two points should have counted regardless the score
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 509
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by jlt9889:

so just becasue the red light goes off that is the correct call? is that what espn said?  just another fool for believing the media. you can clearly see .3 seconds left and the ball inside the rim terry cannot slam the ball with the ball still in his hand inside the rim?  i dont know man but they CLEARLY got this wrong. another bad beat but hey it happens right? i dont want to argue or throw it in other peoples face but just be consistent with the play call. the two points should have counted regardless the score


man, you are a real idiot.

the espn clock is not the official clock.  the official clock is on the baskets, which ties in to the red light you see ON.

pause your TV and you will often see the TV clock behind the official clock.

the call was 100% correct.
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.