The OP appears a bit shady on some plays.
Coach, ignore these guys who are hating and are probably on the losing side of this season. It's people like them that discourage quality posters, such as yourself. Keep banging out these great plays
Coach, ignore these guys who are hating and are probably on the losing side of this season. It's people like them that discourage quality posters, such as yourself. Keep banging out these great plays
Keep it real, you never posted a AZ 2h, changed your Murray to Hopkins bet but still counted itas a win, had Metcalf also but didn’t see it as a loss.Nice record either way. BOL the rest of the way.
Keep it real, you never posted a AZ 2h, changed your Murray to Hopkins bet but still counted itas a win, had Metcalf also but didn’t see it as a loss.Nice record either way. BOL the rest of the way.
@dynamicz Ive never had a year where Ive paid the book, ever. Ive been betting since age 16 and 1/2 doz yrs later Ive net profit every single year. Please stop encouraging fudged records and dishonesty. It would make you an accomplice and a clown by doing such
@dynamicz Ive never had a year where Ive paid the book, ever. Ive been betting since age 16 and 1/2 doz yrs later Ive net profit every single year. Please stop encouraging fudged records and dishonesty. It would make you an accomplice and a clown by doing such
I’m not coming in here to hate but just being real. You’re a good capper are these props. A winner and I will not attempt to take that away from you.
however you said the juice is too high on Murray so you will be taking hop prop instead. And then counted both as wins. Instead usually means in place of. So there’s an added win. Then you said locked in props: and said Metcalf. Once again you said locked in. And you said could also take locket if your juice is too high. However you said you locked in Metcalf and others could take locket if their juice is too high. But you’re going to count locket and not Metcalf. As sleepy joe would say - cmon man. You’re already a winner no need to skew a record. If Metcalf wins you would have counted that and I’d say locket lost you would have not counted it. You said locked in lol then pretend you didn’t have Metcalf. I’m just saying you’re record posted seems skewed here. Sorry if this pisses you off as you’re an asset to the forum and good at these props and a winner. Not discrediting that just saying a lot of people would consider this to be a possibility the record could be argued at the least. Keep winning and once again not trying to piss you off just saying I get why folks are saying what they are about record.
I’m not coming in here to hate but just being real. You’re a good capper are these props. A winner and I will not attempt to take that away from you.
however you said the juice is too high on Murray so you will be taking hop prop instead. And then counted both as wins. Instead usually means in place of. So there’s an added win. Then you said locked in props: and said Metcalf. Once again you said locked in. And you said could also take locket if your juice is too high. However you said you locked in Metcalf and others could take locket if their juice is too high. But you’re going to count locket and not Metcalf. As sleepy joe would say - cmon man. You’re already a winner no need to skew a record. If Metcalf wins you would have counted that and I’d say locket lost you would have not counted it. You said locked in lol then pretend you didn’t have Metcalf. I’m just saying you’re record posted seems skewed here. Sorry if this pisses you off as you’re an asset to the forum and good at these props and a winner. Not discrediting that just saying a lot of people would consider this to be a possibility the record could be argued at the least. Keep winning and once again not trying to piss you off just saying I get why folks are saying what they are about record.
He just needs more clarification on each bet if he wants to be considered legit. Not hating, actually trying to help the OP out.
He just needs more clarification on each bet if he wants to be considered legit. Not hating, actually trying to help the OP out.
u dont need validation from these keyboard warriors -- its a forum and a discussion. u guys are too butt hurt over either a mishap/mistake or simply him just conversing about who he chooses and who he likes - why does it matter so much to you whether he has his record one loss short or one win to many- u guys are being very redundant in making sure he knows that his record isnt what he stated - just move on whats it to ya he helped out a buncha ppl with his picks yet thats all u care about
u dont need validation from these keyboard warriors -- its a forum and a discussion. u guys are too butt hurt over either a mishap/mistake or simply him just conversing about who he chooses and who he likes - why does it matter so much to you whether he has his record one loss short or one win to many- u guys are being very redundant in making sure he knows that his record isnt what he stated - just move on whats it to ya he helped out a buncha ppl with his picks yet thats all u care about
@HailFlutie
Hey moron read the 1st page of the thread where its says "these are my leans" will post my plays later
I dont give a shit about records or anything, a loss is a loss and I'll take it.
I'll post the freaking tickets and times before the game.
I do this cause its fun and could care less what my record is.
@HailFlutie
Hey moron read the 1st page of the thread where its says "these are my leans" will post my plays later
I dont give a shit about records or anything, a loss is a loss and I'll take it.
I'll post the freaking tickets and times before the game.
I do this cause its fun and could care less what my record is.
@jpot34
How so.... CLEARLY post my plays before the game, Yes I said I was either taking Metcalf or Lockett go back a couple pages.
I was sitting there waiting till it went down, then I would of took metcalf. and took the loss, but i didnt so it worked out for me
ASK yourself this question "did all three other plays hit?"
Ohh they did so I guess I might be pretty good
@jpot34
How so.... CLEARLY post my plays before the game, Yes I said I was either taking Metcalf or Lockett go back a couple pages.
I was sitting there waiting till it went down, then I would of took metcalf. and took the loss, but i didnt so it worked out for me
ASK yourself this question "did all three other plays hit?"
Ohh they did so I guess I might be pretty good
@jaybucko
Yea I bet those live and keep no record of them, I just post if I win or lose if people want to se what I bet live or 2nd halfs.
Plus I usually update those before games are over, only keep track of props cause thats what this thread is about
@jaybucko
Yea I bet those live and keep no record of them, I just post if I win or lose if people want to se what I bet live or 2nd halfs.
Plus I usually update those before games are over, only keep track of props cause thats what this thread is about
@jpot34
Ok sorry, one freaking play out of 30+ I posted I picked one over another.
Like I said the other 3 hit, it was just circumstance on how it worked out.
I dont care about records really I just like talking to like minded people on here to be honest
@jpot34
Ok sorry, one freaking play out of 30+ I posted I picked one over another.
Like I said the other 3 hit, it was just circumstance on how it worked out.
I dont care about records really I just like talking to like minded people on here to be honest
@jgjtrapboss
That's because I ended up taking BOTH of them, Juice went down so I took them. (i'll post the tickets if you want)
We are talking about 4 plays here, look at my record and previous posts, all clearly states what I'm taking.
Don't play my plays then, but I know even if you took Metcalf and the 3 others you went 3-1 then
Jesus Christ people I'm not here to make this a job
@jgjtrapboss
That's because I ended up taking BOTH of them, Juice went down so I took them. (i'll post the tickets if you want)
We are talking about 4 plays here, look at my record and previous posts, all clearly states what I'm taking.
Don't play my plays then, but I know even if you took Metcalf and the 3 others you went 3-1 then
Jesus Christ people I'm not here to make this a job
@LoafOfBread
Thanks brother! Haters gunna hate
If hey dont like it then move on to the next thread, but I know that people who have followed for the last 3 weeks been making money
@LoafOfBread
Thanks brother! Haters gunna hate
If hey dont like it then move on to the next thread, but I know that people who have followed for the last 3 weeks been making money
HERE IS PROOF RIGHT AFTER THE GAME STARTED I SAID I TOOK LOCKETT #DROPSMIC
HERE IS PROOF RIGHT AFTER THE GAME STARTED I SAID I TOOK LOCKETT #DROPSMIC
1ST POST OF THIS THREAD AND "THESE ARE MY LEANS" ABOUT THE MIKE WILLIAMS PICK
ANYBODY GOT ANYTHING ELSE......
1ST POST OF THIS THREAD AND "THESE ARE MY LEANS" ABOUT THE MIKE WILLIAMS PICK
ANYBODY GOT ANYTHING ELSE......
@STLcoach
Ok you cheating snake oil salesman. Whatever you say, but the posts don't lie. You clearly said, you were taking Metcalf, but the Lockett juice was too high.You also took my fantasy player who got 1 catch yesterday, being Mike Williams. It was atrocious they didn't throw to him. Just read the posts after mine as a few others called your A$$ out!
@STLcoach
Ok you cheating snake oil salesman. Whatever you say, but the posts don't lie. You clearly said, you were taking Metcalf, but the Lockett juice was too high.You also took my fantasy player who got 1 catch yesterday, being Mike Williams. It was atrocious they didn't throw to him. Just read the posts after mine as a few others called your A$$ out!
To be clear - dude is a beast with props. Proven. Winning literally every time he posts so I am also going to give mad props to him on his props. Keep it up coach
To be clear - dude is a beast with props. Proven. Winning literally every time he posts so I am also going to give mad props to him on his props. Keep it up coach
@HailFlutie
Lol, got a smile on my face over here just counting my racks.
would never let a “keyboard warrior” like yourself get under my skin
Have a good day though
@HailFlutie
Lol, got a smile on my face over here just counting my racks.
would never let a “keyboard warrior” like yourself get under my skin
Have a good day though
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.