Okay so Minnesota straight up for 17,000 puts me at a +$12,900 for the week which makes Sunday a little easier. I am posting my plays early because I am heading to MetLife for the Jets/Giants game!!
Chiefs -6.5 8,800 to win 8,000
Cleveland Browns -2.5 8,800 to win 8,000
NYJ +130 8,000 to win 10,400
Evening games will come later
Biggest bet of the week will be Seattle Seahawks +6.5 tomorrow night so if you wanna throw them in a parlay
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Okay so Minnesota straight up for 17,000 puts me at a +$12,900 for the week which makes Sunday a little easier. I am posting my plays early because I am heading to MetLife for the Jets/Giants game!!
Chiefs -6.5 8,800 to win 8,000
Cleveland Browns -2.5 8,800 to win 8,000
NYJ +130 8,000 to win 10,400
Evening games will come later
Biggest bet of the week will be Seattle Seahawks +6.5 tomorrow night so if you wanna throw them in a parlay
Lost close to 20 this week myself. Saints, Rams, Chiefs all messing me up somewhere or another. The 3rd down flags being thrown for Atl was absurd. That's football
0
Lost close to 20 this week myself. Saints, Rams, Chiefs all messing me up somewhere or another. The 3rd down flags being thrown for Atl was absurd. That's football
Lost close to 20 this week myself. Saints, Rams, Chiefs all messing me up somewhere or another. The 3rd down flags being thrown for Atl was absurd. That's football
0
Lost close to 20 this week myself. Saints, Rams, Chiefs all messing me up somewhere or another. The 3rd down flags being thrown for Atl was absurd. That's football
Gambling is all relative. Some of the posters here on Covers can not comprehend how someone has 30K of disposable cash to gamble on sports each week. I would suspect, that if the OP is truthful in his posts, then he is most likely has a net worth in the range of 5-10 million. Losing 30K in a weekend is where his risk tolerance lies and is an appropriate price to pay for his personal entertainment. Undoubtedly, his net worth was accumulated doing something other than gambling.
Personally, I am more comfortable investing my $$$$ in the markets and sports betting at $100 a pop for entertainment. Over 99% of gamblers lose after the vig in the long run, so why even chase that when there are many other ways to make money. In the markets, 99% of long term investors win. I'm not comfortable gambling 30K on sports, but I have positions in 25 different stocks and ETF's over that amount.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
1
Gambling is all relative. Some of the posters here on Covers can not comprehend how someone has 30K of disposable cash to gamble on sports each week. I would suspect, that if the OP is truthful in his posts, then he is most likely has a net worth in the range of 5-10 million. Losing 30K in a weekend is where his risk tolerance lies and is an appropriate price to pay for his personal entertainment. Undoubtedly, his net worth was accumulated doing something other than gambling.
Personally, I am more comfortable investing my $$$$ in the markets and sports betting at $100 a pop for entertainment. Over 99% of gamblers lose after the vig in the long run, so why even chase that when there are many other ways to make money. In the markets, 99% of long term investors win. I'm not comfortable gambling 30K on sports, but I have positions in 25 different stocks and ETF's over that amount.
I’m laughing reading some of these posts people are posting. Stop over thinking and start with team vs team. The Seahawks have a lethal offense. I doubt they lose this game. Take hawks with the points. Stay away from San Fran. You’ll see.
4
I’m laughing reading some of these posts people are posting. Stop over thinking and start with team vs team. The Seahawks have a lethal offense. I doubt they lose this game. Take hawks with the points. Stay away from San Fran. You’ll see.
Where the 49ers are concerned, I am a doubting Thomas...they are gonna have to show me tonight...seeing is believing and so far I am not impressed. Their success so far has been against struggling teams and QBs.
They have run up the scores on tomato cans which doesn't prove zip to me. Great teams in the past call off their dogs when the outcome is no longer in doubt...not the Shanahan 49ers.
BOL bobo...that was the name of a 1967 British comedy with Peter Sellers and his beautiful Swedish wife Britt Eklund.
0
Where the 49ers are concerned, I am a doubting Thomas...they are gonna have to show me tonight...seeing is believing and so far I am not impressed. Their success so far has been against struggling teams and QBs.
They have run up the scores on tomato cans which doesn't prove zip to me. Great teams in the past call off their dogs when the outcome is no longer in doubt...not the Shanahan 49ers.
BOL bobo...that was the name of a 1967 British comedy with Peter Sellers and his beautiful Swedish wife Britt Eklund.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
