Nothing here was well done. Lets be honest. This thread is embarrassing. Packers were totally dominated in the second half. If you had the Packers at a PK, you have to be ECSTATIC at getting a push. That doesn't sound like a joke line to me. It sounds like a total misreading of the game and the line.
0
Nothing here was well done. Lets be honest. This thread is embarrassing. Packers were totally dominated in the second half. If you had the Packers at a PK, you have to be ECSTATIC at getting a push. That doesn't sound like a joke line to me. It sounds like a total misreading of the game and the line.
Nothing here was well done. Lets be honest. This thread is embarrassing. Packers were totally dominated in the second half. If you had the Packers at a PK, you have to be ECSTATIC at getting a push. That doesn't sound like a joke line to me. It sounds like a total misreading of the game and the line.
Right they were dominated, but as with any bet, you're subject to luck...and the Bears started out with bad luck. An onsides kick, an INT that went from Bears cornerback to Packers receiver...
The problem was, the Packers went up 3, so they didn't have to rely on Seneca Wallace, who was obviously outmatched. They could play the slow down game, and a push was a desperate notion at the time.
The Packers couldn't convert a couple yards for a TD, and the Bears went for it on 4th and inches and made it.
In the end, when the luck is against you, you need to be happy for the push.
I kniow what you're saying-it was the right side-but the right side doesn't always win.
If Rogers doesn't get injured, the total FLIES over. So, the right side (over) didn't cash.
That's the way it is-luck plays a part-that's why your picks need to be not just good but VERY good to counter any bad luck.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:
Nothing here was well done. Lets be honest. This thread is embarrassing. Packers were totally dominated in the second half. If you had the Packers at a PK, you have to be ECSTATIC at getting a push. That doesn't sound like a joke line to me. It sounds like a total misreading of the game and the line.
Right they were dominated, but as with any bet, you're subject to luck...and the Bears started out with bad luck. An onsides kick, an INT that went from Bears cornerback to Packers receiver...
The problem was, the Packers went up 3, so they didn't have to rely on Seneca Wallace, who was obviously outmatched. They could play the slow down game, and a push was a desperate notion at the time.
The Packers couldn't convert a couple yards for a TD, and the Bears went for it on 4th and inches and made it.
In the end, when the luck is against you, you need to be happy for the push.
I kniow what you're saying-it was the right side-but the right side doesn't always win.
If Rogers doesn't get injured, the total FLIES over. So, the right side (over) didn't cash.
That's the way it is-luck plays a part-that's why your picks need to be not just good but VERY good to counter any bad luck.
Nothing here was well done. Lets be honest. This thread is embarrassing. Packers were totally dominated in the second half. If you had the Packers at a PK, you have to be ECSTATIC at getting a push. That doesn't sound like a joke line to me. It sounds like a total misreading of the game and the line.
BIG NINER, I HAVE SAID MANY TIMES THAT ANYTHING YOU SAY I CANT TAKE SERIOUSLY... YOU SAID TONY ROMO IS MORE CLUTCH THEN ELI MANNING... ANYTHING ELSE YOU SAY FROM THAT POINT IS TOTALLY IGNORED....
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:
Nothing here was well done. Lets be honest. This thread is embarrassing. Packers were totally dominated in the second half. If you had the Packers at a PK, you have to be ECSTATIC at getting a push. That doesn't sound like a joke line to me. It sounds like a total misreading of the game and the line.
BIG NINER, I HAVE SAID MANY TIMES THAT ANYTHING YOU SAY I CANT TAKE SERIOUSLY... YOU SAID TONY ROMO IS MORE CLUTCH THEN ELI MANNING... ANYTHING ELSE YOU SAY FROM THAT POINT IS TOTALLY IGNORED....
Nothing here was well done. Lets be honest. This thread is embarrassing. Packers were totally dominated in the second half. If you had the Packers at a PK, you have to be ECSTATIC at getting a push. That doesn't sound like a joke line to me. It sounds like a total misreading of the game and the line.
YOU WERE DOWN 10 POINTS GOING INTO THE 4TH QUARTER.. YOU WERE THE LUCKY ONE TO GET A FIELDGOAL... ONE MORE FIRST DOWN AND THE GAME WAS OVER... IF MCCARTHY WOULD HAVE GIVEN HIS TEAM ANY SHOT BY USING HIS TIMEOUTS APPROPRIATELY YOU WOULD HAVE ALSO LOST... HE LOST HIS TEAM THE GAME BY THE WAY HE CALLED THOSE TIMEOUTS BUT HE GAVE BEARS BACKERS A PUSH
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:
Nothing here was well done. Lets be honest. This thread is embarrassing. Packers were totally dominated in the second half. If you had the Packers at a PK, you have to be ECSTATIC at getting a push. That doesn't sound like a joke line to me. It sounds like a total misreading of the game and the line.
YOU WERE DOWN 10 POINTS GOING INTO THE 4TH QUARTER.. YOU WERE THE LUCKY ONE TO GET A FIELDGOAL... ONE MORE FIRST DOWN AND THE GAME WAS OVER... IF MCCARTHY WOULD HAVE GIVEN HIS TEAM ANY SHOT BY USING HIS TIMEOUTS APPROPRIATELY YOU WOULD HAVE ALSO LOST... HE LOST HIS TEAM THE GAME BY THE WAY HE CALLED THOSE TIMEOUTS BUT HE GAVE BEARS BACKERS A PUSH
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.