https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101769819&page=1 |
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101769819&page=1 |
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101769819&page=1 |
SF is clearly the better team there is no doubt about it. GB defense is weak. I am going to SLAM SF but only on one condition and that is if it doesn't snow. If it is cold then I don't mind because Kaep and Gore are going to shred that GB d-line and rush for over 200 yards combined, you can quote me on that! Crabtree will be targeted a ton on 2nd/3rd and short and that covers.com is how the niners win this game by running the clock and getting those crucial first downs.
Oh yeah, take the under on this as well ;)
SF is clearly the better team there is no doubt about it. GB defense is weak. I am going to SLAM SF but only on one condition and that is if it doesn't snow. If it is cold then I don't mind because Kaep and Gore are going to shred that GB d-line and rush for over 200 yards combined, you can quote me on that! Crabtree will be targeted a ton on 2nd/3rd and short and that covers.com is how the niners win this game by running the clock and getting those crucial first downs.
Oh yeah, take the under on this as well ;)
SF is clearly the better team there is no doubt about it. GB defense is weak. I am going to SLAM SF but only on one condition and that is if it doesn't snow. If it is cold then I don't mind because Kaep and Gore are going to shred that GB d-line and rush for over 200 yards combined, you can quote me on that! Crabtree will be targeted a ton on 2nd/3rd and short and that covers.com is how the niners win this game by running the clock and getting those crucial first downs.
Oh yeah, take the under on this as well ;)
SF is clearly the better team there is no doubt about it. GB defense is weak. I am going to SLAM SF but only on one condition and that is if it doesn't snow. If it is cold then I don't mind because Kaep and Gore are going to shred that GB d-line and rush for over 200 yards combined, you can quote me on that! Crabtree will be targeted a ton on 2nd/3rd and short and that covers.com is how the niners win this game by running the clock and getting those crucial first downs.
Oh yeah, take the under on this as well ;)
Week 1 is irrelevant, remember Kaep threw for 412 yards!! No need to RUN in that game when the passing game was successful.
I doubt he will throw for 300+ yards in this game but I will put money that gore rushes for more than 44yards like he did week 1
Week 1 is irrelevant, remember Kaep threw for 412 yards!! No need to RUN in that game when the passing game was successful.
I doubt he will throw for 300+ yards in this game but I will put money that gore rushes for more than 44yards like he did week 1
He is not from Wisconsin....he lived for 3 years..he was moved to California when he was 4yrs old....
Thats not 'being from Wisc"
He is not from Wisconsin....he lived for 3 years..he was moved to California when he was 4yrs old....
Thats not 'being from Wisc"
Obviously I am rooting for GB...but I am not betting this game.
I just like the chats on see on this game and people betting each side for the wrong reason...
For example, betting GB just because its cold...
Or betting SF cause gb is only 8-7-1 and SF D is so much better and will shut them down, or GB D stinks....
GB is 6-2 with Rodgers..if you look at the game they lost without him, Bears at home, Philly at home, Minn tie, Pitt at home, NY at NY....all 5 of those were tied or only 1 possession games in the 4th qtr...it is very easy to say they win all 5 of those without Wallace, Tolzien or Flynn at QB...13-3 or 12-4 is the worst record GB probably would have had this year
GB D allows only 22 ppg with Rodgers which ranks 13th in the NFL, and only 14ppg at home...With Rodgers at QB, the defense is on the field less, less short fields and less 3 and outs
Fact is, in the first meeting this year, GB had the lead with 7 mins left in the game....SF was 9 for 18 on 3rd down and turnovers were 2-0....
I believe 3rd down and turnovers will once again decide this game, especially with home cold it will be....this game can go either way
Obviously I am rooting for GB...but I am not betting this game.
I just like the chats on see on this game and people betting each side for the wrong reason...
For example, betting GB just because its cold...
Or betting SF cause gb is only 8-7-1 and SF D is so much better and will shut them down, or GB D stinks....
GB is 6-2 with Rodgers..if you look at the game they lost without him, Bears at home, Philly at home, Minn tie, Pitt at home, NY at NY....all 5 of those were tied or only 1 possession games in the 4th qtr...it is very easy to say they win all 5 of those without Wallace, Tolzien or Flynn at QB...13-3 or 12-4 is the worst record GB probably would have had this year
GB D allows only 22 ppg with Rodgers which ranks 13th in the NFL, and only 14ppg at home...With Rodgers at QB, the defense is on the field less, less short fields and less 3 and outs
Fact is, in the first meeting this year, GB had the lead with 7 mins left in the game....SF was 9 for 18 on 3rd down and turnovers were 2-0....
I believe 3rd down and turnovers will once again decide this game, especially with home cold it will be....this game can go either way
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.