Ahoy all. As I have already locked in my bets this AM, I will share a moderate-strong play for today. Yesterday's 2* were Skins +7.5 and Niners +7 - I also placed an additional 1* bet on SF +9.5 at halftime (which I noted and recommended in another thread).
Tonight's play does not quite qualify as a 2*, though my model predicts that tonight's Total will fall UNDER 46 (~ 44.8); most of these 46's have been gobbled up but as public money continues to come in on the OVER, these may start to show up again at certain books.
Tonight's game should be a bit more of a dogfight than people expect; The steelers (4th rated, non-adjusted) sack defense should test this inexperienced O line of SD (much more so than a weak Browns pass rush did last week). Nonetheless, I expect Allen & role players (Gates, Woodhead, etc.) to make notable contributions.
On the other side, we have a strong Pittsburgh team who, despite a long week for Vick & Brown to play pitch and catch, still will have Michael Vick largely in a game manager type role. Expect him to dial up a few more shots than perhaps last week, though this offense will still be hugely reliant on Bell.
I do have some weak indicators of value with PIT +4 in this one; though some sources fairly-intimately familiar with Vick have stated that he does not look like he has in years past. The adjustment from the April look ahead line of SD -1 to SD -3.5 (several well known handicappers went on the record stating that Ben to Vick is a 3.5 pt downgrade prior to last Thurs.) indicates that a slightly above average is expected from Vick for a cover. San Diego's defense is poor, but Vick is not in a position to truly punish them for this. We may very well see Crybaby Phillip by the end of tonight's game, but I personally will be laying off choosing sides in this one.
Recommendation: UNDER 46 w/ slight lean to PIT +4.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Ahoy all. As I have already locked in my bets this AM, I will share a moderate-strong play for today. Yesterday's 2* were Skins +7.5 and Niners +7 - I also placed an additional 1* bet on SF +9.5 at halftime (which I noted and recommended in another thread).
Tonight's play does not quite qualify as a 2*, though my model predicts that tonight's Total will fall UNDER 46 (~ 44.8); most of these 46's have been gobbled up but as public money continues to come in on the OVER, these may start to show up again at certain books.
Tonight's game should be a bit more of a dogfight than people expect; The steelers (4th rated, non-adjusted) sack defense should test this inexperienced O line of SD (much more so than a weak Browns pass rush did last week). Nonetheless, I expect Allen & role players (Gates, Woodhead, etc.) to make notable contributions.
On the other side, we have a strong Pittsburgh team who, despite a long week for Vick & Brown to play pitch and catch, still will have Michael Vick largely in a game manager type role. Expect him to dial up a few more shots than perhaps last week, though this offense will still be hugely reliant on Bell.
I do have some weak indicators of value with PIT +4 in this one; though some sources fairly-intimately familiar with Vick have stated that he does not look like he has in years past. The adjustment from the April look ahead line of SD -1 to SD -3.5 (several well known handicappers went on the record stating that Ben to Vick is a 3.5 pt downgrade prior to last Thurs.) indicates that a slightly above average is expected from Vick for a cover. San Diego's defense is poor, but Vick is not in a position to truly punish them for this. We may very well see Crybaby Phillip by the end of tonight's game, but I personally will be laying off choosing sides in this one.
Recommendation: UNDER 46 w/ slight lean to PIT +4.
I will go on to note that, my own personal rating has Vick as about a 3.2 pt drop off from Ben. Additionally, the circadian rhythm factor here plays AGAINST pittsburgh in this one -- yet another reason I will be laying off. I do think steelers are the better team and chargers should have some significant issues up front on offense (just ask Peyton Manning how long it takes to get an O line in sync), though steelers are missing their best defender yet again this week.
0
I will go on to note that, my own personal rating has Vick as about a 3.2 pt drop off from Ben. Additionally, the circadian rhythm factor here plays AGAINST pittsburgh in this one -- yet another reason I will be laying off. I do think steelers are the better team and chargers should have some significant issues up front on offense (just ask Peyton Manning how long it takes to get an O line in sync), though steelers are missing their best defender yet again this week.
Listening to Chargers radio, sounds like the plan is to blitz Vick 50% of the time since they feel that this Vick is not the Vick of the "dawg" days.
Interesting. This could actually benefit the steelers though -- I'd be more worried about the D dropping into coverage and forcing Vick to throw into tight windows. Similarly, as far as total implications, I'd expect more checkdowns and less turnovers, if anything.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:
Listening to Chargers radio, sounds like the plan is to blitz Vick 50% of the time since they feel that this Vick is not the Vick of the "dawg" days.
Interesting. This could actually benefit the steelers though -- I'd be more worried about the D dropping into coverage and forcing Vick to throw into tight windows. Similarly, as far as total implications, I'd expect more checkdowns and less turnovers, if anything.
The addition of Gates will be beneficial to the Chargers in this game. As long as there's no more injuries to the Chargers O-line *during* the game, the Chargers should be able to put some points on the board. Rivers ability to read defenses is, what I'd say above average, but his throws are mainly contingent the receivers running the right patters, and turning their bodies at the right time. The Chargers spend a lot of time with this in practice.
The Chargers will be without the services of Stevie Johnson, which is a blow to the offense, but Dontrelle Inman getting some playing time will be great. Rivers seems to do well with players he's already developed chemistry with, and Inman has been on the squad for a few years now.
Conversely, the Chargers have trouble tackling and defend mobile QBs very poorly. I haven't watched Vick much since leaving the Eagles, but if he's still pretty mobile, I see Vick buying a lot of time finding open receivers. And that could spell a long day for the Chargers. I'll have to see if Verrett and Flowers are probable for the game.
BOL on your play tonight.
0
Nice, analysis, DrJohn.
The addition of Gates will be beneficial to the Chargers in this game. As long as there's no more injuries to the Chargers O-line *during* the game, the Chargers should be able to put some points on the board. Rivers ability to read defenses is, what I'd say above average, but his throws are mainly contingent the receivers running the right patters, and turning their bodies at the right time. The Chargers spend a lot of time with this in practice.
The Chargers will be without the services of Stevie Johnson, which is a blow to the offense, but Dontrelle Inman getting some playing time will be great. Rivers seems to do well with players he's already developed chemistry with, and Inman has been on the squad for a few years now.
Conversely, the Chargers have trouble tackling and defend mobile QBs very poorly. I haven't watched Vick much since leaving the Eagles, but if he's still pretty mobile, I see Vick buying a lot of time finding open receivers. And that could spell a long day for the Chargers. I'll have to see if Verrett and Flowers are probable for the game.
Look, I dont mean to be a clown but there is absolutely ZERO "advanced statistical perspective" in your entire write-up, putting that into your title was the hook that got me to read.
Your title is misleading. The entire crux of your thread and the reason that you're backing the under is based off of raw or naked numbers (the steelers 4th rated sack defense) instead of advanced metrics.
Your "source" says that "Vick does not look like he has in past years". Really ground breaking and forward thinking information there lol. There was a reason that Vick was signed off the street in August. He isnt very good.
Pittsburghs secondary is awful, they have absolutely no effective pass rushers and their linebacking corps consists of an old man, a bust, a rookie an oft injured Shazier and Lawrence Timmons. Philip Rivers will pick them apart with or without an effective OLine.
On the opposite side, SD has Eric Weddle and bunch of JAGS on defense. They cant stop the run and Pittsburghs identity with Vick at Qb is of the power running variety. LeVeon Bell is gonna eat tonight.
This game screams 27-24 and OVER IMO.
0
Look, I dont mean to be a clown but there is absolutely ZERO "advanced statistical perspective" in your entire write-up, putting that into your title was the hook that got me to read.
Your title is misleading. The entire crux of your thread and the reason that you're backing the under is based off of raw or naked numbers (the steelers 4th rated sack defense) instead of advanced metrics.
Your "source" says that "Vick does not look like he has in past years". Really ground breaking and forward thinking information there lol. There was a reason that Vick was signed off the street in August. He isnt very good.
Pittsburghs secondary is awful, they have absolutely no effective pass rushers and their linebacking corps consists of an old man, a bust, a rookie an oft injured Shazier and Lawrence Timmons. Philip Rivers will pick them apart with or without an effective OLine.
On the opposite side, SD has Eric Weddle and bunch of JAGS on defense. They cant stop the run and Pittsburghs identity with Vick at Qb is of the power running variety. LeVeon Bell is gonna eat tonight.
The addition of Gates will be beneficial to the Chargers in this game. As long as there's no more injuries to the Chargers O-line *during* the game, the Chargers should be able to put some points on the board. Rivers ability to read defenses is, what I'd say above average, but his throws are mainly contingent the receivers running the right patters, and turning their bodies at the right time. The Chargers spend a lot of time with this in practice.
The Chargers will be without the services of Stevie Johnson, which is a blow to the offense, but Dontrelle Inman getting some playing time will be great. Rivers seems to do well with players he's already developed chemistry with, and Inman has been on the squad for a few years now.
Conversely, the Chargers have trouble tackling and defend mobile QBs very poorly. I haven't watched Vick much since leaving the Eagles, but if he's still pretty mobile, I see Vick buying a lot of time finding open receivers. And that could spell a long day for the Chargers. I'll have to see if Verrett and Flowers are probable for the game.
BOL on your play tonight.
Thanks for the insight.
Last I checked, Verrett and Flowers on track to suit up. I agree with most of your points. Though I simply don't think Rivers will have the time tonight. Don't get me wrong, he's great at getting the ball out quick, but not to be understated, the Browns have one of the (opponent adjusted) worst pass rushes in the league. The Steelers are on the opposite side of the spectrum. John Gruden referred to the current O line of the Chargers as a group of no name turnstiles, which isn't that far fetched from the limited film available.
re: Vick, like I say, I've consulted some sources whose opinions I value, and they do not think this is the Vick of old -- as far as mobility OR throwing the ball.
I like this game to be one of the more boring primetime games with more 3 & outs than one might expect at first glance.
0
Quote Originally Posted by iConsciousness:
Nice, analysis, DrJohn.
The addition of Gates will be beneficial to the Chargers in this game. As long as there's no more injuries to the Chargers O-line *during* the game, the Chargers should be able to put some points on the board. Rivers ability to read defenses is, what I'd say above average, but his throws are mainly contingent the receivers running the right patters, and turning their bodies at the right time. The Chargers spend a lot of time with this in practice.
The Chargers will be without the services of Stevie Johnson, which is a blow to the offense, but Dontrelle Inman getting some playing time will be great. Rivers seems to do well with players he's already developed chemistry with, and Inman has been on the squad for a few years now.
Conversely, the Chargers have trouble tackling and defend mobile QBs very poorly. I haven't watched Vick much since leaving the Eagles, but if he's still pretty mobile, I see Vick buying a lot of time finding open receivers. And that could spell a long day for the Chargers. I'll have to see if Verrett and Flowers are probable for the game.
BOL on your play tonight.
Thanks for the insight.
Last I checked, Verrett and Flowers on track to suit up. I agree with most of your points. Though I simply don't think Rivers will have the time tonight. Don't get me wrong, he's great at getting the ball out quick, but not to be understated, the Browns have one of the (opponent adjusted) worst pass rushes in the league. The Steelers are on the opposite side of the spectrum. John Gruden referred to the current O line of the Chargers as a group of no name turnstiles, which isn't that far fetched from the limited film available.
re: Vick, like I say, I've consulted some sources whose opinions I value, and they do not think this is the Vick of old -- as far as mobility OR throwing the ball.
I like this game to be one of the more boring primetime games with more 3 & outs than one might expect at first glance.
I look at this game like the Colts without Luck... Colts were ultra conservative with Hasselback and so were the Steelers last week with Vick. The Steelers should have been playing with house money this week as Vick should be 1-0 if it wasn't for Tomlin's moves. Now they need a win and I don't know how good this SD team is and which one shows up... I could see them win this game by 7, or by 3.
0
I look at this game like the Colts without Luck... Colts were ultra conservative with Hasselback and so were the Steelers last week with Vick. The Steelers should have been playing with house money this week as Vick should be 1-0 if it wasn't for Tomlin's moves. Now they need a win and I don't know how good this SD team is and which one shows up... I could see them win this game by 7, or by 3.
Look, I dont mean to be a clown but there is absolutely ZERO "advanced statistical perspective" in your entire write-up, putting that into your title was the hook that got me to read.
Your title is misleading. The entire crux of your thread and the reason that you're backing the under is based off of raw or naked numbers (the steelers 4th rated sack defense) instead of advanced metrics.
Your "source" says that "Vick does not look like he has in past years". Really ground breaking and forward thinking information there lol. There was a reason that Vick was signed off the street in August. He isnt very good.
Pittsburghs secondary is awful, they have absolutely no effective pass rushers and their linebacking corps consists of an old man, a bust, a rookie an oft injured Shazier and Lawrence Timmons. Philip Rivers will pick them apart with or without an effective OLine.
On the opposite side, SD has Eric Weddle and bunch of JAGS on defense. They cant stop the run and Pittsburghs identity with Vick at Qb is of the power running variety. LeVeon Bell is gonna eat tonight.
This game screams 27-24 and OVER IMO.
There's actually considerable statistical analysis that goes into all my picks. What I have done here is summarized the logical basis for my picks -- I don't elaborate upon my procedure here as it is fairly complex; if you'd like to discuss though shoot me a PM and I'd be more than happy to do so.
All of my statistics that I use for internal purposes are opponent adjusted. I use more than one model, as well as employ regression analysis, among other methods. I am actually well versed in econometrics, as it is central to the research I do for my occupation. Many of the methods I use for handicapping are what one might call academic in nature. I am by no means saying this to be pretentious.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheShallowCross:
Look, I dont mean to be a clown but there is absolutely ZERO "advanced statistical perspective" in your entire write-up, putting that into your title was the hook that got me to read.
Your title is misleading. The entire crux of your thread and the reason that you're backing the under is based off of raw or naked numbers (the steelers 4th rated sack defense) instead of advanced metrics.
Your "source" says that "Vick does not look like he has in past years". Really ground breaking and forward thinking information there lol. There was a reason that Vick was signed off the street in August. He isnt very good.
Pittsburghs secondary is awful, they have absolutely no effective pass rushers and their linebacking corps consists of an old man, a bust, a rookie an oft injured Shazier and Lawrence Timmons. Philip Rivers will pick them apart with or without an effective OLine.
On the opposite side, SD has Eric Weddle and bunch of JAGS on defense. They cant stop the run and Pittsburghs identity with Vick at Qb is of the power running variety. LeVeon Bell is gonna eat tonight.
This game screams 27-24 and OVER IMO.
There's actually considerable statistical analysis that goes into all my picks. What I have done here is summarized the logical basis for my picks -- I don't elaborate upon my procedure here as it is fairly complex; if you'd like to discuss though shoot me a PM and I'd be more than happy to do so.
All of my statistics that I use for internal purposes are opponent adjusted. I use more than one model, as well as employ regression analysis, among other methods. I am actually well versed in econometrics, as it is central to the research I do for my occupation. Many of the methods I use for handicapping are what one might call academic in nature. I am by no means saying this to be pretentious.
There's actually considerable statistical analysis that goes into all my picks. What I have done here is summarized the logical basis for my picks -- I don't elaborate upon my procedure here as it is fairly complex; if you'd like to discuss though shoot me a PM and I'd be more than happy to do so.
All of my statistics that I use for internal purposes are opponent adjusted. I use more than one model, as well as employ regression analysis, among other methods. I am actually well versed in econometrics, as it is central to the research I do for my occupation. Many of the methods I use for handicapping are what one might call academic in nature. I am by no means saying this to be pretentious.
Everything that you write in this reply is exactly what I was looking for when I opened the thread initially. Would have been great to have read your advanced metric impressions.
Advanced metrics make the best cappers job much easier. Trust me I know lol.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrJohn3719:
There's actually considerable statistical analysis that goes into all my picks. What I have done here is summarized the logical basis for my picks -- I don't elaborate upon my procedure here as it is fairly complex; if you'd like to discuss though shoot me a PM and I'd be more than happy to do so.
All of my statistics that I use for internal purposes are opponent adjusted. I use more than one model, as well as employ regression analysis, among other methods. I am actually well versed in econometrics, as it is central to the research I do for my occupation. Many of the methods I use for handicapping are what one might call academic in nature. I am by no means saying this to be pretentious.
Everything that you write in this reply is exactly what I was looking for when I opened the thread initially. Would have been great to have read your advanced metric impressions.
Advanced metrics make the best cappers job much easier. Trust me I know lol.
I think this could go Under.. but it's because I think the Chargers blow out the overwhelmed Steelers. But I'd be worried as an Under Bettor that the Chargers might go off a little too hard. I could see a 40-17 type game.
The Steelers are without Shazier, and are supremely overrated on Defense. Look at the teams they faced: 49ers, Ravens, Rams. Outside of holding the Pats in the first half of game one this Steelers Defense has still been awful. They even yielded points to Kaepernick, which should in and of itself be cause for concern - and I will adjust next week's Giants-Eagles matchup accordingly.
I think Chargers roll and I'm confident it's not even close.
0
I think this could go Under.. but it's because I think the Chargers blow out the overwhelmed Steelers. But I'd be worried as an Under Bettor that the Chargers might go off a little too hard. I could see a 40-17 type game.
The Steelers are without Shazier, and are supremely overrated on Defense. Look at the teams they faced: 49ers, Ravens, Rams. Outside of holding the Pats in the first half of game one this Steelers Defense has still been awful. They even yielded points to Kaepernick, which should in and of itself be cause for concern - and I will adjust next week's Giants-Eagles matchup accordingly.
I think Chargers roll and I'm confident it's not even close.
I think this could go Under.. but it's because I think the Chargers blow out the overwhelmed Steelers. But I'd be worried as an Under Bettor that the Chargers might go off a little too hard. I could see a 40-17 type game.
The Steelers are without Shazier, and are supremely overrated on Defense. Look at the teams they faced: 49ers, Ravens, Rams. Outside of holding the Pats in the first half of game one this Steelers Defense has still been awful. They even yielded points to Kaepernick, which should in and of itself be cause for concern - and I will adjust next week's Giants-Eagles matchup accordingly.
I think Chargers roll and I'm confident it's not even close.
I appreciate the opinion. My own analysis suggests otherwise, and while it is by no means the sexy pick tonight, I'm finding the most value in the Under.
0
Quote Originally Posted by porcelainfist:
I think this could go Under.. but it's because I think the Chargers blow out the overwhelmed Steelers. But I'd be worried as an Under Bettor that the Chargers might go off a little too hard. I could see a 40-17 type game.
The Steelers are without Shazier, and are supremely overrated on Defense. Look at the teams they faced: 49ers, Ravens, Rams. Outside of holding the Pats in the first half of game one this Steelers Defense has still been awful. They even yielded points to Kaepernick, which should in and of itself be cause for concern - and I will adjust next week's Giants-Eagles matchup accordingly.
I think Chargers roll and I'm confident it's not even close.
I appreciate the opinion. My own analysis suggests otherwise, and while it is by no means the sexy pick tonight, I'm finding the most value in the Under.
Ahoy all. As I have already locked in my bets this AM, I will share a moderate-strong play for today. Yesterday's 2* were Skins +7.5 and Niners +7 - I also placed an additional 1* bet on SF +9.5 at halftime (which I noted and recommended in another thread).
Tonight's play does not quite qualify as a 2*, though my model predicts that tonight's Total will fall UNDER 46 (~ 44.8); most of these 46's have been gobbled up but as public money continues to come in on the OVER, these may start to show up again at certain books.
Tonight's game should be a bit more of a dogfight than people expect; The steelers (4th rated, non-adjusted) sack defense should test this inexperienced O line of SD (much more so than a weak Browns pass rush did last week). Nonetheless, I expect Allen & role players (Gates, Woodhead, etc.) to make notable contributions.
On the other side, we have a strong Pittsburgh team who, despite a long week for Vick & Brown to play pitch and catch, still will have Michael Vick largely in a game manager type role. Expect him to dial up a few more shots than perhaps last week, though this offense will still be hugely reliant on Bell.
I do have some weak indicators of value with PIT +4 in this one; though some sources fairly-intimately familiar with Vick have stated that he does not look like he has in years past. The adjustment from the April look ahead line of SD -1 to SD -3.5 (several well known handicappers went on the record stating that Ben to Vick is a 3.5 pt downgrade prior to last Thurs.) indicates that a slightly above average is expected from Vick for a cover. San Diego's defense is poor, but Vick is not in a position to truly punish them for this. We may very well see Crybaby Phillip by the end of tonight's game, but I personally will be laying off choosing sides in this one.
Recommendation: UNDER 46 w/ slight lean to PIT +4.
DRJohn r u pick any game from NCAAF ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrJohn3719:
Ahoy all. As I have already locked in my bets this AM, I will share a moderate-strong play for today. Yesterday's 2* were Skins +7.5 and Niners +7 - I also placed an additional 1* bet on SF +9.5 at halftime (which I noted and recommended in another thread).
Tonight's play does not quite qualify as a 2*, though my model predicts that tonight's Total will fall UNDER 46 (~ 44.8); most of these 46's have been gobbled up but as public money continues to come in on the OVER, these may start to show up again at certain books.
Tonight's game should be a bit more of a dogfight than people expect; The steelers (4th rated, non-adjusted) sack defense should test this inexperienced O line of SD (much more so than a weak Browns pass rush did last week). Nonetheless, I expect Allen & role players (Gates, Woodhead, etc.) to make notable contributions.
On the other side, we have a strong Pittsburgh team who, despite a long week for Vick & Brown to play pitch and catch, still will have Michael Vick largely in a game manager type role. Expect him to dial up a few more shots than perhaps last week, though this offense will still be hugely reliant on Bell.
I do have some weak indicators of value with PIT +4 in this one; though some sources fairly-intimately familiar with Vick have stated that he does not look like he has in years past. The adjustment from the April look ahead line of SD -1 to SD -3.5 (several well known handicappers went on the record stating that Ben to Vick is a 3.5 pt downgrade prior to last Thurs.) indicates that a slightly above average is expected from Vick for a cover. San Diego's defense is poor, but Vick is not in a position to truly punish them for this. We may very well see Crybaby Phillip by the end of tonight's game, but I personally will be laying off choosing sides in this one.
Recommendation: UNDER 46 w/ slight lean to PIT +4.
I do not. Over the past few years I've found my models to be somewhat unreliable when attempting to translate them into NCAAF. My winning % for NCAAF is sub 50%.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mrdish33:
DRJohn r u pick any game from NCAAF ?
I do not. Over the past few years I've found my models to be somewhat unreliable when attempting to translate them into NCAAF. My winning % for NCAAF is sub 50%.
Excellent thread but with an expected total of 44.8 is there really value in under 46? What edge does your math equate to for this play?
45 is a key number, so bearing that in mind and that I'm getting ~1.2 pts of value, the play is a 1* (almost 2*) play for me. I have a way of calculating perceived statistical edge with my picks, which is what I employ in determining bet size with the Kelly Criterion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
Excellent thread but with an expected total of 44.8 is there really value in under 46? What edge does your math equate to for this play?
45 is a key number, so bearing that in mind and that I'm getting ~1.2 pts of value, the play is a 1* (almost 2*) play for me. I have a way of calculating perceived statistical edge with my picks, which is what I employ in determining bet size with the Kelly Criterion.
Ahoy all. As I have already locked in my bets this AM, I will share a moderate-strong play for today. Yesterday's 2* were Skins +7.5 and Niners +7 - I also placed an additional 1* bet on SF +9.5 at halftime (which I noted and recommended in another thread).
Tonight's play does not quite qualify as a 2*, though my model predicts that tonight's Total will fall UNDER 46 (~ 44.8); most of these 46's have been gobbled up but as public money continues to come in on the OVER, these may start to show up again at certain books.
Tonight's game should be a bit more of a dogfight than people expect; The steelers (4th rated, non-adjusted) sack defense should test this inexperienced O line of SD (much more so than a weak Browns pass rush did last week). Nonetheless, I expect Allen & role players (Gates, Woodhead, etc.) to make notable contributions.
On the other side, we have a strong Pittsburgh team who, despite a long week for Vick & Brown to play pitch and catch, still will have Michael Vick largely in a game manager type role. Expect him to dial up a few more shots than perhaps last week, though this offense will still be hugely reliant on Bell.
I do have some weak indicators of value with PIT +4 in this one; though some sources fairly-intimately familiar with Vick have stated that he does not look like he has in years past. The adjustment from the April look ahead line of SD -1 to SD -3.5 (several well known handicappers went on the record stating that Ben to Vick is a 3.5 pt downgrade prior to last Thurs.) indicates that a slightly above average is expected from Vick for a cover. San Diego's defense is poor, but Vick is not in a position to truly punish them for this. We may very well see Crybaby Phillip by the end of tonight's game, but I personally will be laying off choosing sides in this one.
Recommendation: UNDER 46 w/ slight lean to PIT +4.
44 points. The Under was the correct call.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrJohn3719:
Ahoy all. As I have already locked in my bets this AM, I will share a moderate-strong play for today. Yesterday's 2* were Skins +7.5 and Niners +7 - I also placed an additional 1* bet on SF +9.5 at halftime (which I noted and recommended in another thread).
Tonight's play does not quite qualify as a 2*, though my model predicts that tonight's Total will fall UNDER 46 (~ 44.8); most of these 46's have been gobbled up but as public money continues to come in on the OVER, these may start to show up again at certain books.
Tonight's game should be a bit more of a dogfight than people expect; The steelers (4th rated, non-adjusted) sack defense should test this inexperienced O line of SD (much more so than a weak Browns pass rush did last week). Nonetheless, I expect Allen & role players (Gates, Woodhead, etc.) to make notable contributions.
On the other side, we have a strong Pittsburgh team who, despite a long week for Vick & Brown to play pitch and catch, still will have Michael Vick largely in a game manager type role. Expect him to dial up a few more shots than perhaps last week, though this offense will still be hugely reliant on Bell.
I do have some weak indicators of value with PIT +4 in this one; though some sources fairly-intimately familiar with Vick have stated that he does not look like he has in years past. The adjustment from the April look ahead line of SD -1 to SD -3.5 (several well known handicappers went on the record stating that Ben to Vick is a 3.5 pt downgrade prior to last Thurs.) indicates that a slightly above average is expected from Vick for a cover. San Diego's defense is poor, but Vick is not in a position to truly punish them for this. We may very well see Crybaby Phillip by the end of tonight's game, but I personally will be laying off choosing sides in this one.
Recommendation: UNDER 46 w/ slight lean to PIT +4.
Thank you. I've got a big play for Thursday that I've already locked, though it appears as if that game is currently off the board. I'll try to get the write up & prediction up tomorrow.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dick747:
Nice work
And very good timing
Thank you. I've got a big play for Thursday that I've already locked, though it appears as if that game is currently off the board. I'll try to get the write up & prediction up tomorrow.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.